MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
Today, House lawmakers impeached President Trump for his alleged role in last week’s attack on the U.S. Capitol, capping an extraordinary week of violence, apprehension and partisan brawling in Congress just as Washington cranks up security in preparation for Joe Biden’s inauguration, just a week away.
The 232-197 vote was historic: It made Trump the first president in the country’s history to be impeached twice.
And unlike the first debate, this time the president’s Democratic critics had support across the aisle. Ten Republicans joined every voting Democrat to approve the single impeachment article, which accuses Trump of inciting violence against the same federal government he leads.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who oversaw both impeachment efforts, said Trump’s refusal to concede his election defeat — and his subsequent efforts to rally supporters to the Capitol to overturn the election results — amounted to sedition. The president, she said, gave Congress no choice.
Pelosi said in a floor speech before the vote. “We know we experienced the insurrection that violated the sanctity of the people’s Capitol,” “And we know that the president of the United States incited this insurrection, this armed rebellion, against our common country.
“He must go,” she added. “He is a clear and present danger to the nation that we all love.”
The most prominent Republican to break with Trump was House Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney the No. 3 Republican leader and highest-ranking GOP woman in Congress, who said Trump “summoned the mob,” “lit the flame” of the attack and — despite pleas from his Hill allies — refused to call it off.
“There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution,” Cheney said in a statement.
The impeachment vote will lead to a trial in the Senate, though the timing and outcome in the upper chamber are unclear. Many Senate republicans are now keeping quite about how they will vote –many say they want to hear the evidence.
We may see this go on right up to the inauguration day — which again leaves this country vulnerable to an eventual uprising and the dangers of a declaration of martial law,
This will no doubt fuel more fears of a civil war in the United states as supporters of the President find themselves at odds with traditional GOP leaders.
We should not forget that Trump still won more votes than he did in 2016 and his support base will not magically evaporate because Biden becomes President.
But it has to be said that President Trump sincerely thought that he could irreversibly effect significant long-term change to the way that America is run by “draining the swamp” that all of his supporters so deeply despise, but he ultimately lacked the ability to take the decisive steps that were necessary in order to execute this.
He literally said that “We will never give up. We will never concede, it doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved”, yet completely changed his tune following the day’s tumultuous events in DC and after mysteriously “going dark” for over 24 hours, during which time some speculate that he was forced by his enemies in the permanent military, intelligence, and diplomatic bureaucracies to give up the fight.
The long battle is over — or is it?
Even though the demonstrations have quieted down, there are some loose ends that need to be tied together, especially when we are now being besieged with reports that a nationwide insurrection is allegedly in the planning according to reports form the mainstream media.
The FBI is warning of plans for armed protests at all 50 state capitals and in Washington, D.C., in the days leading up to President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration, stoking fears of more bloodshed and making the topic of civil war an ever present worry for American citizens who have never lived through this type of threat in the homeland.
An internal FBI bulletin warned, , that the nationwide protests may start later this week and extend through Biden’s Jan. 20 inauguration.
The FBI said it wasn’t focused on peaceful protests but “on those threatening their safety and the safety of other citizens with violence and destruction of property.”
Javed Ali, a former FBI senior intelligence officer who teaches courses in counterterrorism at the University of Michigan, said it can be challenging for law enforcement to identify the line between people exercising their constitutionally protected rights to bear arms and free speech and those who pose “a real operational threat.
I interpret that is saying that this is not about Trump, or Conservatives it is about every American citizen being on notice — you are now in the midst of an ideological war and that while you were believing that the swamp would be drained — many people are going to be swallowed by the Swamp.
When it comes to the breach of the Capitol building, yes, there was obviously violence there. But how much of that violence was instigated by bad actors and not the majority of those that were there? What we are dealing with is a relatively small group of people that stormed the capitol.
In fact, after the initial breach was made, video evidence is also clear that many people walked in peacefully. They took pictures just like tourists, they prayed– some sang. Some people were there for other reasons not just the overturning of the electoral vote.
The political overreaction to all of this is suspect –and every American has to realize that they have been put on notice.
Cell phone companies are now handing over to authorities the data of private citizens who were in the Capitol building. They may all face massive prosecution.
What is this all about? Why impeach Trump with only a few days left in his presidency? Why go after the peaceful, no-harm intending protestors who went into the Capitol just as so many sit-in protestors have done in the Capitol for decades? What makes these protestors so different?
It is about crushing what the power elite see as dissent against their tough love approach to the country — a tough love and a cleansing of ideologies that represent the old America — they wish to build back a better America and to prepare it for the step by step conversion to the global plantation.
It is the move to remind all Americans who is in charge — and that there are phantoms that lurk among you –all having the potential of being radicalized terrorists. Before we are able to enjoy the blessings of the new normal we have to endure the mass paranoia and mistrust of everyone because they can be ideological time bombs ready to strike.
We must endure the The New Normal War on Domestic Terror before we have the successful reset.
Yes, that’s right, the party is over– The swamp is now poised to swallow up those who are misled and have been beguiled and fooled by baseless conspiracy theory and are part of the techno cult, QAnon.
I have been monitoring posts on Facebook of those who are Q followers that are now confused as many things that QAnon predicted have not come to pass –while others are holding on to the idea that Trump will pull a hail Mary at the end and fight to the death.
Quite unnerving to get all sorts of questions sent to me about the latest QAnon rumors that have no real facts to back them up. QAnon is now facing a post Trump identity crisis and this poses a danger as hard core “Q” will continue with the plan and whip up a storm.
The uncertainty has been compounded by the abrupt public resignation, of Ron Watkins, the administrator of Q’s online sanctuary on the message board 8kun.
Some QAnon proponents have begun to publicly grapple with reality and question whether Q was nothing more than a clever misinformation ruse — a hoax that duped so many people.
Trump’s defeat threatens to undermine the story that Q, a supposed top-secret government operative, has woven over years: that Trump and his allies would soon vanquish the swamp and round up criminal democrats and pedophiles.
Many were hopeful while others were militant, even in the face of knowing that the whole Q project was a proposed by DARPA as a Self-Organizing Collective Intelligence.
The basic dynamics of a SOCI is that some sort of attractor is able to grab the attention and energy of some group of people. It is generally one that is very vague and abstract; some idea or notion that only makes sense to a relatively small group of people.
When those people apply their attention and energy to the SOCI, it makes it more real, easier for more people to grasp onto and to find interesting and valuable. It then becomes more attractive to more people and their attention and energy.
This created what is called a generative loop.
As the SOCI becomes more real and attracts more people it begins to encounter challenges.
If the SOCI has enough capacity within its collective intelligence to resolve the challenge, it “levels up” and expands its ability to attract more attention and energy from more people.
We reported this from the beginning — but people that support the plan would not listen and I am sure many others who are devout followers are disenchanted and are probably being monitored by the FBI and the department of Homeland security as potential domestic terrorists.
What convinced me of this is that back in 2012, David H. Petraeus spoke at the In-Q-Tel CEO Summit about the use of SOCI’s before Q was even born. he said it would be crucial for monitoring domestic terrorist cells in the country — used to profile radical hate groups online.
Now I am sure that the “Q” in In-Q-Tel is not lost on alert individuals and the comments about computers that perceive sense and responds—describes the Q phenomena exactly.
Furthermore, Petraeus said:
“Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters—all connected to the next-generation Internet using abundant, low cost, and high-power computing—the latter now going to cloud computing, in many areas greater and greater supercomputing, and, ultimately, heading to quantum computing.
In practice, these technologies could lead to rapid integration of data from closed societies and provide near-continuous, persistent monitoring of virtually anywhere we choose. “Transformational” is an overused word, but I do believe it properly applies to these technologies, particularly to their effect on clandestine tradecraft. Taken together, these developments change our notions of secrecy and create innumerable challenges—as well as opportunities.”
It looks like the “Q” program was already in the works and was spoken of in 2012.
I am sure that QAnon was a trap all along set up by operatives wishing to compile a list of belligerent combative that they wished to make an example when the uprising was to occur.
It was well programmed and they new that eventually those caught up in the QAnon techno cult would be swallowed by the swamp.
Pay attention to the moves of clandestine operators. They are duping you into thinking you are getting all of the answers –when you are probably getting very little –and filling in the blanks with your cognitive bias.
Q had an uncanny knack for approximating future events — a literal government Nostradamus, and this is what made it suspect as a possible psychological operations tool.
In fact, the media was used in the psy-op as they trolled ideological dissenters by ignoring their inquiries about election malfeasance. They intentionally “projected” that Biden won the election despite the outcome still being litigated.
The purpose in doing so was to preemptively thwart patriotic Americans’ employment of “Democratic Security” measures through the expression of their constitutional right to freely assemble across the country in support of Trump by demoralizing them with the false impression that doing so wouldn’t change anything.
This fueled an already confused QAnon and Conservative base that were already programmed to hear that the election was a rigged affair.
This was a “thought experiment” that was carried out by the elite that called upon their experts in group think to weigh in on a possible battlefield America scenario that was first brought up at Bilderberg meetings where it was discussed how America could go rogue and prove to be ungovernable.
The power structure that decided upon making Biden their public face (at least for the time being) will do everything to ensure that one-party rule by their Democrat proxies becomes the defining feature of American politics for the indefinite future. All their plans that will soon be described are driven by this insatiable desire, which must be kept in mind when analyzing everything that will follow. Being the masterful manipulators that they are, however, they’ll continue disguising their intentions with high-sounding rhetoric about “peace”, “love”, and “equality” in order to facilitate their “perception managers’” gaslighting operations of mis portraying opponents to their policies as being in support of “violence”, “hate”, and “racism”.
True American Patriots must not fall for this and should do their utmost to call out this Orwellian doublespeak at every opportunity– but it must be done in whispers rather than bullhorns — in lawful meetings that are supposed to be protected by the constitution.
But the big hurdle is always that, totalitarian censorship policies are typical of one-party rule, and existing trends in this direction will only get worse.
What will “Domestic Terrorism” mean in this law? The answer to that is pretty much always “whatever they want it to mean.”
Certainly, it will include “incitement” and “hate speech”, I would expect “denialism” to make an appearance and be downright shocked if “spreading misinformation” doesn’t get a mention. Don’t be surprised if “questioning elections” or “bringing democracy into disrepute” is made an outright crime.
It will probably be tied into the COVID “pandemic” in some way, too. After all, what is discouraging people from taking vaccines if not the very definition of “terrorism”, right? It’s possible that even climate change will get a mention as well. They like to slide that into every issue these days.
Joe Biden has claimed multiple times to be the author of the original Patriot Act, saying it was based entirely on a bill he proposed in the wake of the Oklahoma City Bombing of 1995.
Well, now he has a chance to work on the reboot too, and they are always so much better when you can get the original creative team back together.