As we remember Martin Luther King Jr. today with his hopeful message to the world about equality and love, our society is more divided than ever on the issue of race. Additionally, the purveyors and founding fathers of the New World Order are again meeting in Davos today to lay down the blueprint for the future and to introduce more draconian ideas for tyranny. We all know that the World Economic Forum takes delight in exploiting trauma and fear in order to reset the world and create a world government. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks with geopolitical commentator, David Knight about DAVOS – SYMPTOMS OF A NEW SYSTEM.
I know that today is Martin Luther King Jr. Day – a day that in a lot of ways pays mere lip service to the man who had a dream. His message was a glimmer of hope in the world about equality and love. Trying to break through the morass of inequality – and for some time it felt as though the dream was being fulfilled.
Then after the Obama administration things went south – the dream had been taken over by intrusive thoughts. The media wished to push the idea that a successor to Obama was a racist and that was the impetus for the major divisions we face today – not just politically, but at issue is a racial divide that cuts to the character of Americans who have matured and have understood that we need each other,
At the very moment when the issue of race might at long last have been put to rest, it is now becoming the most important issue of all.
Just as minority groups have achieved once-unimaginable levels of equality in America, our society is more divided than ever on the issue of race.
The more the division is fueled the more we see segregation with the focus on how we are different rather that the same –and we keep hearing about “white privilege and systemic racism being taught to our children, thus creating a generation of young people who hate America and the older generation that they are trained or indoctrinated into believing are racists and abusers of the environment.
Defining an entire group of people, their attitudes, pitfalls and moral associations, based solely on their racial characteristics is itself a fairly good demonstration of racism. For “whiteness” to be “problematized” white people must be shown to be a problem. And not only on some academic, abstract level but in the practical day-to-day business of judging other people.
The dream of Dr. King has been shattered – and I am sure he would be heartbroken to see that what he said means nothing and the hollow virtue signaling that many people are doing to keep themselves wrapped in guilt and above suspicion.
It is by this criterion we are seeing that the world is so divided and ungovernable that world powers wish to reset the system—and create a counterfeit equality by sharing wealth and allowing for the gross idea that you will own nothing and be happy.
Well, the purveyors and founding fathers of the New World Order are again meeting in Davos today to lay down the blueprint for the future and to introduce more draconian ideas for tyranny.
What we are dealing with here are not normal people with conscience, ethics or empathy. Their behavior is much more akin to higher functioning psychopaths and sociopaths rather than the average political leader.
We saw their tyranny on full display during the Covid lockdowns and the vicious attempts to enforce vaccine passports; their actions betray their long game.
We all know that the WEF takes delight in exploiting trauma and fear in order to reset the world and create a world government.
Klaus Schwab’s vision of the Reset, what he calls the “4th Industrial Revolution”, is a veritable nightmare world in which Artificial Intelligence runs everything, society is condensed into digital enclaves called “smart cities” and people are oppressed by carbon taxation. The World economic forum actively supports the concept of the “Shared Economy” in which you will “own nothing, have no privacy” and you will supposedly be happy about it, but only because you won’t have any other choice.
The common naïve assumption among skeptics of conspiracy is that the globalists are regular human beings with the same drives and limited desires as the rest of us. They might have some power, but world events are still random and certainly not controlled.
This is a fallacy. The globalists are not like us. They are not human. They despise humanity and seek to do away with it. And, because of this, they have entirely different aspirations compared to the majority of us which include aspirations of dominance.
The meeting consists of corrupt politicians, corporate giants, “philanthropists” and all manner of elite monsters tar gather for a weekend of telling each other how smart they are and making the world generally worse.
But Apparently two important individuals have pulled out of the forum. George Soros and Klaus Schwab apparently will not attend the meeting. Soros claims he has a scheduling conflict and Schwab says he has pulled because of health reasons.
However, it was reported days ago that both were not going top be there because of security reasons. Both allegedly were given death threats.
It appears that some of the world media has been reporting on the World Economic Forum and it’s fourth industrial revolution. There have been some very controversial things that have been said about humans in general that have rubbed people the wring way — which is an oversimplification.
When you consider all the ways “we the people” are being bullied, beaten, gaslighted, targeted, tracked, repressed, robbed, impoverished, imprisoned and killed by governments, all over the world one can only conclude that you shouldn’t trust the government with your privacy, your property, your life, or your freedoms.
The idea of a world order has made it impossible to escape to someplace that is not oppressive. Especially countries that call themselves democratic.
Remember the purpose of a good government is to protect the lives and liberties of its people.
Unfortunately, what we have been saddled with is, in almost every regard, the exact opposite of an institution dedicated to protecting the lives and liberties of its people.
There are some commentators in the mainstream media and others who are now openly suggesting that it’s actually okay to be opposed to certain aspects of groups like the World Economic Forum. They give you permission to be concerned, just don’t dare call it conspiracy.
This propaganda is a deviation from the abject denials we’re accustomed to hearing in the Liberty Movement for the past decade or more. We have all been confronted with the usual cognitive dissonance – The claims that globalist groups “just sit around talking about boring economic issues” and nothing they do has any bearing on global politics or your everyday life. In some cases, we were even told that these groups of elites “don’t exist”.
Now, the media is admitting that yes, perhaps the globalists do have more than just a little influence over governments, social policies and economic outcomes. But, what the mainstream doesn’t like is the assertion that globalists have nefarious or authoritarian intentions.
They have to appear to be balanced and so the ideas of conspiracy theory are still considered off limits even though the whole thought of a small group of unelected officials making policy is by definition a conspiracy.
For example, if you take a look at the World Economic Forum website you will see a list of things they will be discussing. A read through the menu one tends to see a pattern.
Here are a few things that they wish to discuss:
Addressing the Current Energy and Food Crises in the context of a New System for Energy, Climate and Nature
Addressing the Current High Inflation, Low Growth, High Debt Economy in the context of a New System for Investment, Trade and Infrastructure
Addressing the Current Industry Headwinds in the context of a New System for Harnessing Frontier Technologies for Private Sector Innovation and Resilience
Addressing the Current Social Vulnerabilities in the context of a New System for Work, Skills and Care
Addressing the Current Geopolitical Risks in the context of a New System for Dialogue and Cooperation in a Multipolar World
Now, none of this is news. A “new system” for energy is a “green new deal”, a “new system” for international cooperation is some type of global governance, and a “new system” for investment and trade covers a lot of topics, including digital currency.
Central-Bank Digital Currencies are coming—whether countries are ready or not
The game-changing development could have a profound impact on the new banking system. But few people still understand it.
One hundred and fourteen countries are exploring digital currencies, and their collective economies represent more than 95% of the world’s GDP, according to the Atlantic Council’s Central Bank Digital Currency tracker. Some countries, including China, India, Nigeria and the Bahamas, have already rolled out digital currencies. Others, like Sweden and Japan, are preparing for possible rollouts. The U.S. is studying the issue and has run trials of various technologies to enable a digital currency, although Fed chair Jerome Powell has indicated the U.S. central bank has no plans to create one, and won’t do so without direction from Congress.
Debates about the necessity, utility and potential pros and cons of digital currencies are often confusing, and confused, in part because every country rolling out a digital currency is doing it in its own way.
Generally, however, CBDCs can be roughly divided into two types: those designed for use by financial institutions and those designed for use by the general public.
The first type is just a new way for central banks to transfer money to commercial banks.
More specifically, some central banks are testing whether money transfers between financial institutions—which in some cases can take days to settle—might be made safer and more efficient under a system in which central-bank money is represented by digital tokens and transactions are settled on a shared distributed ledger, concepts borrowed from cryptocurrency and blockchains.
We have been reporting the way this new fiat token system will increase the power of the surveillance state.
It will also violate the Fourth Amendment rights to privacy.
But it certainly is one of the new systems that the World Economic Forum are supporting for the future.
For many people, especially Ground Zero listeners, many of these things are not new — it is just interesting to see how these corrupt psychopathic leaders no longer hide their agendas.
The reason is simple– no one seems to be fighting back. People take their freedoms for granted — it is as if people do not have the courage and energy to fight back– this it appears that this future and the new systems are inevitable.
To give the alternative media credit — it appears that some of their euphemisms are no longer found in their agenda. Words like “New Normal,” “Build Back Better” or even “reset” seem to be missing.
That is because the alternative media has done and excellent job of exposing their treachery.
But, not to be overlooked, the World economic form believes that the narrative needs to be controlled.
In fact, the World economic forum is clearly concerned about losing control of the narrative–
This is what they say
“The world’s biggest problem solvers need to craft better narratives.
People are more persuaded by the information presented within a narrative because a good narrative helps to ease information processing. Those trying to solve the world’s most pressing challenges must take notice of this.”
It is essentially a very long-winded way of saying “we need to tell better lies”.
Furthermore, they say:
“We must name the real antagonists: irresponsible politicians bought scientists and some companies failing to live up to the needs of the transition to net-zero. We must also stop pretending that there is a debate over the facts of climate change. A false balance is a phenomenon that occurs when a news organization or other media outlet presents an issue as being the subject of a debate, even when there is no actual debate or disagreement among experts on the matter.”
So be ready for an increased effort of shifting blame and shutting down debate apply across the board.
They are no longer calling is silencing or censorship they call it “countering misinformation” in order to promote what they call digital safety.
Or a means of controlling the internet – more specifically, controlling what you are allowed to say and hear on the internet.
Writers George Orwell and Aldous Huxley when observing how the ruling class is able to manipulate, subjugate, and propagandize the willfully ignorant masses through lies, deceptions, disinformation, and fear. But here we are, living through a dystopian nightmare blending the worst aspects of Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World.
Orwell’s explanation of mass-media deception is a brilliant assessment of how the ruling class changes the narrative to suit their needs, and without blinking an eye are able to deny what they have said and done.
Orwell saw this manipulation of the truth before TV, the internet, social media, or professionally created government propaganda existed. In his day only newspapers, radio, and speeches existed to push deception upon the public.
In the government’s ongoing assault on those who criticize the government—whether that criticism manifests itself in word, deed or thought—government and corporate censors claiming to protect us from dangerous, disinformation campaigns are, in fact, laying the groundwork now to preempt any so-called “dangerous” ideas that might challenge the power elite’s stranglehold over our lives.
Another potential focus for discussion, highlighted in a couple of places, will be a push for more direct action. What they seem to be calling “tangible solutions”.
The head of Amnesty International – who will be in attendance – has called for Davos attendees to focus on:
“Tangible solutions that we already know work, rather than opting to protect the existing global economic system at any cost. Underlining that “now is the time for action” not “empty gestures”, and simultaneously echoing the “new system” messaging.”
So it appears that we are now passing the propaganda stage of the “great reset” , and now we transition to the next stage.
Signaling a move away from passive manipulation and psychology-driven control mechanisms and toward more direct enforcement.
The direct enforcement of a new system.
Unfortunately, there is now an overwhelming consensus among elitists in the western world that radical measures must be instituted to control what people think. If you insist on being a rebel, there is a very good chance that you will be punished for holding unorthodox views. You won’t necessarily be put in prison, but our system has countless other ways that it can punish you.
The government has a growing list—shared with fusion centers and law enforcement agencies—of ideologies, behaviors, affiliations and other characteristics that could flag someone as suspicious and result in their being labeled potential enemies of the state. Before long, every household in America will be flagged as a threat and assigned a threat score. It’s just a matter of time before you find yourself wrongly accused, investigated and confronted by police based on a data-driven algorithm or risk assessment culled together by a computer program run by artificial intelligence.
First Amendment activities are being gagged all across the country. Free speech zones, bubble zones, trespass zones, anti-bullying legislation, zero tolerance policies, hate crime laws and a host of other legalistic maladies dreamed up by politicians and prosecutors have conspired to corrode our core freedoms. The reasons for such censorship vary widely from political correctness, safety concerns and bullying to national security and hate crimes but the end result remains the same: the complete eradication of what Benjamin Franklin referred to as the “principal pillar of a free government.”
It is a foregone conclusion that the intelligence agencies of the U.S. government have been weaponized against the American people, throwing the Fourth Amendment and civil rights into the toilet Such activity is historically illegal, but that has not deterred rogue agencies hiding behind a cloak of secrecy.
The FBI revealed how the bureau uses the CIA and National Security Agency to probe the private lives of Americans without a warrant in its updated rulebook, which is the first version made public since the Obama administration.
The handbook, rewritten in 2021, confirms a decade-old leak showcasing the bureau’s collaboration with the CIA and NSA for FBI probes that may involve surveillance without court orders against people not accused of any crimes. Such probes are known as “assessments” at the FBI.
The revelations will fuel critics who have long accused the FBI of abusing its national security surveillance powers.
Under the pretext of helping overwhelmed government agencies work more efficiently, AI predictive and surveillance technologies are being used to classify, segregate and flag the populace with little concern for privacy rights or due process. All of this sorting, sifting and calculating is being done swiftly, secretly and incessantly with the help of AI technology and a surveillance state that monitors your every move. AI predictive tools are being deployed in almost every area of life.
Momentum is building for corporations and the government alike to be able to track the populace, whether through the use of RFID chips embedded in a national ID card, microscopic chips embedded in one’s skin, or tags in retail products.
Nothing like living in a prison world with criminal wardens.
Politically what exists today in many parts of the world is a large criminal gang of war-racketeering corporate fascist psychopaths passing themselves off as “government,” preying upon (and victimizing) the rest of hapless humanity. If only there was an honest government of the people, by the people, for the people, based on the principles of equality (political/economic/social), civil liberty, respect and peace.
SHOW GUEST: DAVID KNIGHT
David Knight is an Electrical Engineer who worked for Texas Instruments & Data General before becoming self-employed in video production and retail. His involvement in 3rd party/independent politics led him to work as a Media Fellow for The American Tradition Institute on Energy Issues.
David was hired as a reporter at Infowars where he covered the Bundy Ranch standoff, Asymmetric Warfare Training, Bilderberg, and Geospatial Intel Surveillance issues. This led to guest hosting duties and his own weekly morning show for over 3 years.
The David Knight Show has been independent for over a year, both as a video broadcast and audio podcast.