King Charles III was recently hospitalized which sent the Royal obsessed media speaking about Prince William taking the throne in the not-too-distant future as the undefinedSupreme Governor of the Church of England,undefined a title he is not interested in having since he does not consider himself that spiritual. Could this mean that William would rather incorporate more military principles than Christian ones? Once he is King, would he reject the genealogies that attempt to connect the bloodlines of King David and Jesus Christ in favor of the pagan cults spawned from King Arthur? Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks with author, Jay Dyer about SACRILEGE - HELLISH REBUKE W/ JAY DYER.
SHOW PREVIEW:
SHOW SAMPLE:
SHOW TRANSCRIPT:
More often than not, especially in times that have been deemed uncertain, apocalyptic ideas SHOW SAMPLE:have been issued in the expectation that human history might screech to a halt at any moment and dissolve into some kind of apocalyptic judgment. Protestant Christians have been especially susceptible to these schemes, especially the more conservative Protestants known as evangelicals, because of their inclination to read and interpret the Bible, literally.
They have tended to focus on the New Testament Book of Revelation as well as the Book of Daniel in the Hebrew Bible. Both texts are replete with imagery and allegory that would strike most casual readers as downright bizarre, but many Christians throughout American history have expended untold energies trying to fit these writings into an interpretive framework for understanding the end of time.
These notions, grounded in a literalistic interpretation of biblical prophecies, admit of many different constructions, and evangelical Christians who agree on such issues as biblical inerrancy, meaning the Bible is infallible without any mistakes or that left out inconvenient texts were left out for a reason and of course church leaders that will argue bitterly over whether or not God’s elect will go through the tribulation which is seven years of rule by the Antichrist predicted in Revelation.
There are arguments over whether or not the United States is the Whore of Babylon – that the Pope is the Antichrist according to protestant tradition. But of course, there are a wide variety of theories swirling around thanks to Nostradamus. combine both his predictions and the biblical revelations and you get a wide variety of candidates for the Antichrist.
There have been times, well spaced out times where I have spoken about my theories regarding a modern antichrist that will arrive in our lifetime.
Since the discovery of hidden coded parchments by the town priest in 1891, the tiny village of Rennes-le-Chateau, France has been linked with the Holy Grail, the Knights Templar, the Priory of Sion, and the royal Merovingian dynasty, which has been said to draw its lineage from Christ himself.
The Merovingian secret has generated theories that to me sound like blasphemy and that if it were true would invalidate the divinity of Christ.
The Divine undefinedBloodlineundefined conspiracy, is at the heart of Dan Brownundefineds The Da Vinci Code, where a secret society, the Priory of Sion, claims to have guarded evidence of the marriage of Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ, their children and their descendants down through the centuries.
This can be called the forbidden conspiracy theory because it reveals that the Catholic church, the Church of England and family dynasties are all part of a conspiracy to produce the divine king of the world order in the new golden age.
It is Christian blasphemy to claim that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and fathered a number of children in a continuous “bloodline”. This bloodline is referred to as the “Holy Grail”, with those possessing it believing themselves the rightful heirs to the throne of Jerusalem or ZION. They believe that a new king of “the holy seed of David” will preside over the new “Messianic kingdom” of Israel and the world.
As bizarre as it sounds to us outsiders, it’s not as fringe a belief as you might imagine but has been quite influential and still has many adherents.
There are still factions of what can be called British Israelism a worldview that first became popular with the elite in England, particularly the military and clergy.
It then spread to the US, becoming more extremist with Christian Identity proponents and a significant number of Pentecostal leaders,
British Israelism is connected with the belief that the Royal Family are descended from King David, and in some factions, that British land is ancient Atlantis. They are sure that the Brits encoded the Egyptian pyramids with special meaning that proves this, and that King Arthur was even involved.
A hymn sung in British churches called “Jerusalem” is based on a poem called “And Did Those Feet In Ancient Time” by William Blake. The poem and song is linked to an idea in the Book of Revelation ( 3:12 and 21:2) describing the Second Coming, where in Jesus returns and establishes a new Jerusalem or Zion in England. It also implies that Jesus visited Europe after the crucifixion. This has been the agenda for a long time. A meme that is encouraged in Europe by secret societal control of the churches.
In order to understand how powerful this Zion utopia is you need to read the passages of Blake’s poetry.
And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England’s mountains green?
And was the holy Lamb of God
On England’s pleasant pastures seen?
And did the Countenance Divine
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here
Among these dark Satanic Mills?
Bring me my bow of burning gold!
Bring me my arrows of desire!
Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold!
Bring me my chariot of fire!
I will not cease from mental fight,
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand,
Till we have built Jerusalem
In England’s green and pleasant land.
It must be pointed out that this hymn literally invokes the physical presence of Jesus in England. That he walked the green fields, the green and pleasant land and that in a perfect European vision of utopia, Jesus or the messiah returns and builds the new Jerusalem or ZION in the place where the kings and rulers are now dead and buried. From there a new order will be in power with the government on the shoulders of the messiah.
The most esoteric knowledge about the possibility that Jesus walked the lands of Europe with Joseph of Arimathea is considered Apocryphal there are those who believe that the legend of Christ escaping his crucifixion and settling in Gaul with his wives are a matter of fact and that divine bloodlines were passed on through the crowned heads of Europe including the British Royal family.
.The Priory SIO along with the Knights Templar kept a secret about Jesus Christ.
They claim to have knowledge and proof that Christ did not die on the cross. They also claim to have evidence that Christ was taken down from the Cross, was revived and fathered children with Mary Magdalene.
This secret would make the crucifixion invalid and the cornerstone doctrine of salvation in the Catholic Church a mockery.
It would not however invalidate Christ’s blood lineage through the house of David. If Christ indeed had children, their bloodlines would still be here today. Merovingian legends about the blood of Christ and his descendants have given us our monarchs throughout history.
The secret of the Holy Grail, the alleged bloodline descendants of Christ and that according to these secret societies Christ’s death was not divine nor an atonement for Salvation.
Therefore, the secret that is being held by the elite of this world is that through the myth of righteous blood they hold the power to bring into the world a man that they can purport to trace the bloodline’s to the house of David and call him the Divine Ruler of the new age.
A new age that will create a counterfeit Zion on earth, a New Age that will see a King in the service of Satan himself.
Some people say Joseph of Arimathea, King Arthur’s ancestor, settled Glastonbury and stuck his staff into the ground. The Tudor royal family claimed to descend from King Arthur and David. They’re kings — they say what they want.
King Henry VIII used this idea to deny the Vatican’s authority over England.
He claimed that he and his descendants had the divine right of rule — because the Holy Roman Empire was the Antichrist system defeated by Christ. In this way, Ol’ Henry restored the British Empire, which was obviously the Kingdom of God on Earth.
British Israelism is a belief created as a psyop by intelligence that disempowered the United States and other lands that they controlled.
The foundation of the belief is that Anglo-Saxon-Celts are the lost tribes of Israel descended from King David. Christ “was sent only to the lost sheep of the House of Israel.
The lost tribes never returned to their Middle Eastern homeland after the Assyrian exile in the eighth century, BC. They remained in the new Roman annex of the Britons.
After Henry VIII died, his son Edward VI ruled as a Protestant king with the aid of his ‘protectors’ - he was only 15 years old. Laws were passed to enforce Protestant doctrine, and Catholic bishops were imprisoned in the Tower of London.
After Edward died, his sister Mary became Queen, repealed the Act of Supremacy and restored Catholicism in England. Her persecution of Protestants earned her the nickname ‘Bloody Mary’.
When Elizabeth I became Queen she attempted to please both sides. She restored the Act of Supremacy but named herself the ‘Supreme Governor’ rather than the Head of the Church of England.
Elizabeth did not want foreign powers involved in the church or state, but also did not want to anger or upset either side.
However it is difficult to name all of the splintered groups within the royal cults that prop up a King and Queen as the true monarch of Israel and of the world.
Many historians have pointed to the synarchy of Arthurian cultists that are waiting for the Resurrection of the King and savior of Israel and Britannia.
King Arthur is based on legends of “a once and future king” who will return at some future point and politically guide England in a time of its greatest need. Some stories included in later editions were based on some legends from France. The two strands were combined.
The stories might be based on a real person from the late Roman occupation of Britannia around 350–410 CE. There are academics trying to prove or disprove the stories, as some places mentioned in the stories are real and others are not. There are many different theories based on the question: was King Arthur a real person or not?
As time passed and stressful politics came and went, the stories were “updated” several times, and more stories added to the original ones, to reflect the current state of ongoing political events.
The current UK royals are not connected to King Arthur by genetics or blood. However it is important to note that both Charles and Prince William have the name Aurthur in their titles.
Little chance exists that any of King Arthur’s children outlived him, and the only grandchildren he had were murdered by Constantine. These two grandsons could have been old enough to have had children of their own before they died, but this theory is only a surmise since no record, chronicle, or romance states they had heirs.
Therefore, it is highly doubtful that King Arthur had any descendants who lived beyond the sixth century. Yet the royal family of England has claimed, that they are descended from King Arthur.
In Fact it was well known that King Charles wanted to name Prince William Aurthur, But Princess Diana did not want it.
Charles however still clings to the idea that he along with Kin Authur are Descendants of Christ.
Jesusundefined siblings were likely to have descendants, among whom King Arthur is usually included. I have never came across any legitimate claims that King Arthur was directly descended from Jesus, but the legend is kept alive not just in spirit and in actions.
During the coronation of King Charles III there were many rituals that took place that if you were to analyze them by every parcel you would understand why there are a great number of people who suspect that the Royals of Britain could very well produce what can be called the modern Day antichrist.
The lawless one that was foretold in scripture as the embodiment of a counterfeit Christ. Anyone who claims to be descendant of Christ or even the embodiment of King Aurthur would most definitely be defined as a false king undefined or a counterfeit Christ.
It needs to be stated that these Arthurian bloodline cults strayed from orthodox Christianity and introduced and blended pagan myths with Christianity which is not acceptable as a belief system for a true Christian.
King Charles III has overplayed his importance as a the Worldundefineds King and those who see him as a savior are setting the stage for the arrival of his infernal majesty.
Most people watching King Charles III sprinkled with water from the River Jordan during his coronation had no idea what insane symbolism was occurring. In the mind of Charles and the broader oligarchy he represents, this ritual symbolizes Charles as the blood heir to the throne of Christ himself. The choice to carry a metallic globe and cross symbolizing his divine right to rule the entire globe as prima inter pares (first among equals)—a symbol of the Holy Roman Emperor—should also not be ignored.
In 1834, British Israelite Henry Drummond stated that “The majority of what was called the religious world, disbelieved that the Jews were to be restored to their own land, and that the newly incarnated Lord Jesus Christ was to return and reign in person on this earth.”
But where would the new Christ reign- well of course it would be the New Roman empire that was established in the British Isles.
Many are unaware of the cult called “British Israelism,” which claimed that the 10 Lost Tribes of Israel actually settled in Britain, and the British Royal family was directly descended from the House of David—the ‘secret children’ of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
These mythologies were he basis for The Last Temptation of Christ, The Da Vinci Code and the popular book Holy Blood Holy Grail.
The stage is set for the Uniting of commerce under the guise of a New Zion, which has been the agenda for mnay centuries. It would be a supported ecumenical attempt at joining forces with the Abrahamic religions and a new order.
A strange collusion of the Jesuit-run papacy of Pope Francis and the Anglican Church of the eco-Crusader King Charles III has united on multiple fronts. This includes Lynn Forester de Rothschild’s Council for Inclusive Capitalism under the banner of the World Economic Forum.
The Pope has recently endorsed the World economic forum even though most of itundefineds agenda deals with depopulation, transhumanism, and a denial of human rights and literally the denial of the existence of God.
Pope Francis the Vicar of Christ sent a message of praise of the World Economic Forum and its founder Klaus Schwab, writing that the group’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, is an “important opportunity” in the wider attempt “to explore innovative and effective ways to build a better world.”
Francis wrote:
“It is my hope, then, that the participants in this year’s Forum will be mindful of the moral responsibility that each of us has in the fight against poverty, the attainment of an integral development for all our brothers and sisters, and the quest for a peaceful coexistence among peoples,”
It is also a little known fact that just after the Coronation of King Charles the III Pope Francis actually sent Charles relics of the True Cross—two small wooden shards from what is believed to be the part of the actual Cross that Christ died on. They were incorporated into the newly made Cross of Wales that was carried at the head of the procession for the coronation in the abbey.
The question is why would the Pope give an alleged Templar relic to a man who probably believes himself to be a blood heir to Jesus himself?
For that matter, why did Prince William’s wife, Kate Middleton, present her second baby to the world dressed in an outfit made famous by accused satanist and pedophile Roman Polanski in the film Rosemary’s Baby featuring the story of a woman who is impregnated by a satanic cult leader and gives birth to the anti-Christ?
Henry Kissinger who was once called the Antichrist by Dr, Heldore played an instrumental role in converting the US from a republic that aspired to uphold liberty to a nation fully committed to empire under the control of The World Economic Forumundefineds techno feudal religious cult.
A cult again championed by both King Charles and now Pope Francis.
He was perhaps a fully witting agent—and thus all the more reprehensible than the many lower auxiliaries of technocracy who are ignorant of the evil they represent… but he was a a disciple of the cult of the antichrist, nonetheless.
As a prized student of Rhodes Scholar William Yandall Elliot who served as a guru to a nest of sociopathic young men at Harvard, Kissinger’s devout misanthropy, idealization of oligarchism, and spiritual devotion to systems of Luciferianism were recognized by his handlers. He soon found himself working for the director of the CIA’s Office of Psychological Strategy Board in 1952, where he was brought into the inner sanctum of global intelligence operations.
Kissinger’s star rose quickly as he was made a member of the Round Table’s American think tank in 1956—The Council on Foreign Relations—and was soon brought into the Rockefeller Commission’s 1956 study group on America and the New World Order (named ‘Prospects for America’). There, he worked closely with Rhodes Scholar Dean Rusk and American fascist Henry Luce. This was soon followed by admission to the Bilderberg Group in 1957, where he went on to lead its steering committee.
Like his Rhodes Scholar mentor earlier, Kissinger found his own protégé in the form of a young sociopath named Klaus Schwab, whom he taught at a CIA-sponsored program at Harvard. Kissinger wasted no time setting the stage for the post-industrial era of deregulation, nation-stripping, and war as he brought the new Trilateral Commission into reality alongside David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Kissinger once made the notion that it would be his mission to dissolve Israel in 10 years. It would be for the greater good of the New Order and to usher in the Anglo Israeli take over for the plot of establishing a new Zion.
Kissinger let the cat out of the bag on May 10, 1982, during a Chatham House Round Table conference in Britain. He described the principled schism between traditionally American vs. British imperial ways of looking at the world and demonstrated his commitment to the British imperial paradigm or establishing a royal order that would balance the world both politically and religiously.
For those who may not be aware, Kissinger’s recruitment to William Yandall Elliot’s Round Table operation in Harvard, his allegiance to the Round Table movement’s Chatham House operation in London and New York (dubbed “The Mothership” by Hillary Clinton), and his words above are nothing less than an admission of allegiance to a new Templar order.
The secret society that Cecil Rhodes established in his last will and testament as “a Church of the British Empire,” modeled on “The Jesuit Constitution” was explicitly based on the Arthurian Grail myths of the Knighthood of the Round Table. These were designed in the 13th century to promote the Templar-managed Crusades and the reconstruction of the Crusader kingdom of Jerusalem.
As even Scottish Rite Grand Master Albert Pike stated in 1871, the Jesuit Order was itself a reconstructed and more disciplined Templar Order. In his Morals and Dogma, he wrote:
The Templars were unintelligent and therefore unsuccessful Jesuits. Their watchword was, to become wealthy, to buy the world. They became so, and in 1312 they possessed in Europe alone more than nine thousand seignories. Riches were the shoal on which they were wrecked. They became insolent and unwisely showed their contempt for the religious and social institutions which they aimed to overthrow. Their ambition was fatal to them.
It has also been demonstrated that the Order of Saint Francis of Assisi was additionally a Templar Order with the additional attributes of a Magna Mater cult of Cybele that dominated Rome as a nature-worship sect. This order also merged into the later Jesuit society. With this in mind, the union of Jesuits and Franciscans in 2013 takes on new meaning and should raise eyebrows.
It was, after all, the Jesuit influence on the 1545-1563 Council of Trent that both fueled the flames of never-ending religious wars across Europe and established the foundations of Christian Zionism and the End Times cults of our modern-day.
One thing is certain: the political religious organization that will produce ‘the antichrist’ has been very angry with something very special within Christianity, Judaism, and Islam for a very long time.
It’s time to rediscover what that is before the End Times cult props up their all-important leader undefined who has decided to reject the Gods of his fathers -and is forthcoming with his disdain of Christianity.
This may happen sooner than we think.
King Charles III was recently hospitalized because of complications from a large prostate. This once again sent the royal obsessed media speaking again about Prince William taking the throne in the not-too-distant future.
On top of casually becoming King of the United Kingdom when he ascends the throne, Prince William will also be dubbed undefinedSupreme Governor of the Church of England.undefined But apparently, heundefineds not particularly comfortable with—or interested in, for that matter—the title.
According to a new book by Robert Hardman, which is being serialized in the Daily Mail, undefinedit is no secretundefined that William undefineddoes not share the Kingundefineds sense of the spiritual, let alone the late Queenundefineds unshakeable devotion to the Anglican church.undefined
Prince William doesnundefinedt go to church every Sunday, but then nor do the large majority of the country. He might go at Christmas and Easter, but thatundefineds it. He very much respects the institutions, but he is not instinctively comfortable in a faith environment.
Apparently, this could also impact the Williamundefineds approach to the coronation, as an insider revealed, undefinedhe is less instinctively spiritual than his father so he would want something a bit more discreet.undefined Oh, and William is allegedly also looking for a much shorter ceremony thatundefineds undefinedideally an hour and ten minutes.undefined
Thereundefineds also tension brewing between William and Charles over how much control Will has in his role as heir.
Does this mean that William would rather see the Monarchy lean towards more military principles than spiritual ones?
Once he is King -would he reject the Christian genealogies that attempt to connect the bloodlines to King David and Jesus Christ?
Less than half the population of England and Wales now calls itself Christian. Charles first secretly had a concern at being expected to represent a multicultural, multi-denominational society when showing such devotion to a particular sect. He wanted to be a “defender of faith” rather than “the” faith. This ambition was hardly reflected in his coronation ceremony,
However Jewish, Hindu, Sikh and Muslim representatives appeared to be committing their service to him as a monarch of the world.
As the Anglican religion loses support, its role in national ceremonies must also decline. The church’s membership as a proportion of the British population is down to single figures and declining.
I am sure William understands this and in order to modernize the Monarchy- I am sure he sees himself as a King that will reject the religion of his Father and create a secular version more in tune with the World Order.
But this very action is a fulfillment of the prophecy in Daniel as to what the Antichrist does in the future.
In the story of the King That exalts himself is read in the passages of the Book of Daniel:
undefinedHe will show no regard for the gods of his fathers, nor for the one desired by women, nor for any other god, because he will magnify himself above them all. And in their place, he will honor a god of fortresses— a god his fathers did not know— with gold, silver, precious stones, and riches. He will attack the strongest fortresses with the help of a foreign god and will greatly honor those who acknowledge him, making them rulers over many and distributing the land for a price.undefined
According to the Biblical scholar David Flynn, The God Of Fortresses is a God from Mars. The war-like Extraterrestrial God. The Hebrew word for the God of Fortresses is Ala Mahozim. In Hebrew, the root word for fortresses is mahoz (MARS) which means the “place of strength” or “stronghold”. According to biblical prophecy, the highly feared Antichrist pays tribute to this “god” which is the Lord of the Sky and space, Baal.
Besides the already established connection with Baal, or his full name in this case, Baalhazor, “Lord of the Fortresses”, there is a curious parallel between this Ala Mahozim and the god Melkart, worshiped in the island kingdom of Tyre. This god was supposedly brought to the island by Astarte after he had fallen from the heavens. His name means, “King of the Fortresses”.
When the god of fortresses is mentioned, there are many interpretations, but the prevailing interpretation is that the fortress is the fortress for war and the warrior gods are the Ala Mahozim. They are the gods that come from the sky and anciently were believed to have lived on Mars.
When one refers to the Ala Mahozim or the god of fortresses, they may also be referring to human warriors or warlike leaders that declare themselves gods. They all seem to have the same characteristics. Many of them have connections to Mars, Egypt, Sumer Sirius and the constellations Canis and Ursa Major.
End Times flashpoint events are to begin in Syria. Syria stems from the Dog Star Sirius or the faithful companion of Orion the Hunter god. Persia or Iran stems from Perseus, the one who hides the secrets of Algol the winking eye of the demon star.
The Mars connections to Egypt, the connections to the blue blooded “gods’ of Syria and the cosmic Persian secret are only part of the equation.
The God of fortresses are those who are considered gods of war. They are gods that are consulted for acts of war and genocide.
Mars is considered the God of War and is connected to the warrior angels spoken of in the Book of Revelation. The angles of war that are also part of the drawing of the stars in the presence of the great and terrible Dragon.
It is then noted that the Great Dragon or Antichrist will declare war on the Christian faithful.
It is quite coincidental that the symbol of the City of London is a Dragon. The Dragon is mentioned several times anciently as a symbol for the reptilian God associated with Venus and the Sun. The Dragon is also known as the Devil.
There has been much speculation as to the cost and time that was taken in trying to link all of the descendants through the times of the Trojans, the Byzantine Empire, Franks, ancient British, Tudor, Anglo-Saxons, Norse, Normans, Guelph, Wettin, Skiold, Irish, Scottish, and Hungarians, but with enough intersecting bloodline theories the Royals have avoided being “related” to the Dracul or the Dragon bloodlines and have wound up being directly related to Jesus Christ himself.
If you are a Christian, the whole idea is blasphemy it is quite literally Antichrist. If the Bloodline is counterfeit so is the “kingdom.” However we are seeing that the commerce of the world is now being analyzed by the World economic forum a think tank that is co-sponsored by King Charles III.
Again, King Charles claims to be of the Blood line of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. It is Christian Blasphemy to claim that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and fathered several children in a continuous “bloodline”.
William will carry on the tradition of becoming the King however now he has claimed that he does not hold any love or duty to the Church of England. Does that also mean that he holds no reverence for Christ? Does he hold fast to the paganistic cults of King Arthur?
It is important however to understand that according to the bible the Antichrist has to lay claim to an impressive pedigree that makes him a counterfeit messiah that rules over what is called an imperial cult – a world order that is promised as a way to create peace and eliminate suffering.
The Imperial cult of ancient Rome identified emperors and some members of their families with the divinely sanctioned authority of the Roman State. Its framework was based on Roman and Greek precedents and was formulated during the early Principate of Augustus. It was rapidly established throughout the Empire and its provinces, with marked local variations in its reception and expression.
Augustus’s reforms transformed Rome’s Republican system of government to a de facto monarchy, couched in traditional Roman practices and Republican values.
A deceased emperor held worthy of the honor could be voted a state divinity by the Senate and elevated as such in an act of apotheosis. The granting of apotheosis means that they made him the equivalent of God on earth.
Although emperors were largely defined by the political and military powers they held, there was also the religious aspect of their role which helped give then authority in the religious sphere of public life.
As Christianity rose to prominence it challenged the established place of the emperor in the religious life of the Empire, and eventually supplanted the pagan ideal of an emperor with its Christian notion of a god-appointed ruler. This idea became embedded in Christian Roman religious thought, although significant vestiges also remained of the pagan past.
This of course led to the creation of the papacy where the Pope is considered the Vicar of Christ. Needless to say that Pope Francis also has been deemed a candidate for the Antichrist because of this reason. His many policies and ideas to unite the Catholic faith with Islam have been highly controversial which has fueled the resolve of those who are Sedavacanists.
Sedevacantism is the position held by some people who identify as Catholic that the present Bishop of Rome is not truly the pope due to the mainstream church’s espousal of what they see as the heresy of modernism and that, for lack of a valid pope, the Holy See has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII.
Despite the apparent success of the Imperial cult as an Empire-spanning cult, it cannot be argued that the Imperial cult was ever a strong enough religious institution in its own right to stand against the rise of Christianity. However, as a political instrument it was indispensable, and as such its religious nature would be subject to change if this was necessary for its survival and this precluded the friction that one may have expected between Christianity and a pagan cult.
None of these pagan cults, nor the so-called divinity of its leaders could compete against Christianity as a whole, but the power of the leaders prevailed, and their divinity was preserved in order to establish a new Roman empire.
Roman Britain or, later, Britannia, “the Britains” was the area of the island of Great Britain that was governed by the Roman Empire, from 43 to 410 AD. It comprised almost the whole of England and Wales and, for a short period, southern Scotland.
The promise was to make the British Empire a new Roman Empire with leadership that included a Monarchial Cult. This new order would be supervised by a chosen leader who claims his lineage to the Roman emperors and even Jesus Christ himself.
The royal families of Europe are vast and diverse, with each family possessing different titles and powers. But one thing they do have in common is a shared ancestor.
While the family trees are complicated, and there are many ways that Europe’s royals are all related to each other, one of the simplest is to look at King George II, who was the King of Great Britain and Ireland from 1727 until 1760.
George’s ancestors now head Europe’s royal families, as his children and grandchildren married royals from around the continent. Their mysterious lineage and bloodlines are a matter of legend – some claim that these bloodlines go back to Joseph of Arimathea – while others believe that after Jesusundefined crucifixion, he took a long trip to Gaul, which is now France and sired children.
It is proposed that “British-Israelism” and the “New Pagan or Roman Imperial Cult” will be the very foundation from which the coming Antichrist will use his European dominance over Israel and then the world.
As its ongoing indoctrination continues, we will begin to hear about pseudo-facts and falsified genealogical histories of how the Lost Tribes of Israel migrated west into Europe, Britain, and ultimately this catering to the notion that British Royals are direct descendants of King David, it will take further the hearts and minds of many others leading them astray into ignorant acceptance.
You should know this agenda does not end with the condensed information I am presenting here, nor will it stand alone as the only false doctrine the future world will yet see, as new claims and scientific, as well as archaeological discoveries, are being made with each passing year that moves closer – lending more ‘credibility’ to this heresy, while hidden under many layers of its teaching is the extremely subtle idea that a World leader with divine rite and wealth could be the ecological messiah whose ideas about the problems of the planet are his opportunity to have a hand in the great reset for the New World Order.
Knowing that the Royals are supposed to be politically neutral makes King Charles moves a bit suspicious –and yet knowing about his background and his thirst for power – I am sure tat behind all of the spirituality he hides behind he sees himself as a latter-day Arthurian authority resurrected and ready to bring about the promised kingdom fist proposed by his Roman predecessors.
But is he the antichrist? Or will the crown of the deceiver be given to his other Arthurian offspring Prince William?
In addition to revealing the timing of the first and second coming of Messiah the Prince, the Biblical prophet Daniel reveals yet another prince who shall later arrive. He is mentioned in 9:26-7, and the people of the Prince that shall come shall destroy the City and the Sanctuary” which speaks of both the original Roman destruction of Jerusalem and it’s Temple in 70 AD led under Titus, yet this prophecy is also referring to a future time when the Antichrist – often referred to as the little prince, little horn, and later as King rises out of the Empire which was once ancient Rome, taking his rightful seat of authority, the power of his kingship, and the crown of the Red Dragon.
The red dragon dates back to the ancient Romans. Britannia was the head of the Western Roman Empire and the symbol of Roman antiquity was a red dragon. It is also the symbol that was seen by John in the Bible to give the beast his power, throne, and great authority.
He along with Pope Francis are beginning to show that they wish to see an all-encompassing reset in the major religions as well.
Many have termed this ecumenical move as “Christlam” as the major religions are attempting to unite into one imperial cult.
By then Prince William when he takes the throne, probably will not have to devote himself to a Christianity that he does not support anyway.
Prince William does not regard the god of his fathers. Nor did his father before him undefined he is just another self-important elite only with the blasphemous idea that God favors his undertakings.
To be sure, it is not the same God that those in Christendom worship.
SHOW GUEST:
Jay Dyer is an author, comedian, and TV presenter known for his deep analysis of Hollywood, geopolitics, and culture. His graduate work focused on psychological warfare and film and he is the author of two books, Esoteric Hollywood 1 & 2, and the co-creator and co-host of the television show, Hollywood Decoded. He has been featured on numerous popular shows, podcasts, and debates with some of the world’s top debaters. Jay’s website is: https://jaysanalysis.com/
