MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
Yesterday, I was listening to the news on the way to work and at the top of the hour, a CBS news reporter was reporting that scientists are now saying that taking low dose aspirin does not prevent or reduce the risk of cardiac problems.
It was like I was experiencing a Mandela Effect because I was always told that a baby aspirin or even a low dose of aspirin can lower the risk of blood clots and reduce stroke and heart attack.
I came home, turned on my computer and there it was in Popular Science.
The headline was clear:
“Aspirin has long been prescribed to prevent heart attacks. Now experts say it shouldn’t. The side effects are not worth the potential benefits, especially for older adults.”
I saw this and thought– I hope people see this and realize that this is evidence that medical science is not settled –and that we could be reading the same headline in the future about the vaccines.
According to Popular Science:
“Low doses of aspirin have long been used as a preventative tool against cardiovascular disease. Past research has shown that daily aspirin use can lower the chances of having your first heart attack or stroke in certain populations. But the regimen is not without risks, and new recommendations suggest doctors rethink its use.
In a draft statement, the US Preventive Services Task Force, an independent group of experts that advise on disease prevention and evidence-based medicine, have updated their recommendations, saying that for older adults, preemptively taking aspirin is not worth the risks. Specifically, the panel states that while starting on aspirin to prevent the onset of heart disease may be beneficial to younger adults aged 40 to 59 on a case by case basis, adults aged 60 and older should not start the regimen. The risks of serious side effects for them, including bleeding in the stomach, intestines, and brain, aren’t worth the potential benefits, the panel states.
The task force clarifies that its new recommendations only apply to those who have never had a heart attack or stroke before, and are not already regularly taking aspirin. But if you are 60 or older and have no history of cardiovascular disease, you should not begin on aspirin.”
How convenient that we hear this now, especially when it was announced last year that aspirin can cut COVID-19 mortality rates in half.
According to Science daily:
“Hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were taking a daily low-dose aspirin to protect against cardiovascular disease had a significantly lower risk of complications and death compared to those who were not taking aspirin.
The researchers found aspirin use was associated with a 44 percent reduction in the risk of being put on a mechanical ventilator, a 43 percent decrease in the risk of ICU admission and — most importantly — a 47 percent decrease in the risk of dying in the hospital compared to those who were not taking aspirin.”
So now we can add aspirin to the notorious list of drugs like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine — notorious meaning the drugs that have been vilified because they are not the required vaccine.
This is an example of how scientists can be paid off to say anything –as long as the checks cash and people swallow this as fact.
I guess taking aspirin will become a political cudgel in telling people that they are no longer able to decide if aspirin is good for anything accept bridging the gap between the days you have opiate pain pills and the days you don’t –and now that they have vilified these drugs we will all be in a world of hurt but it doesn’t natter — if you complain about your freedoms and agency you are considered a Nazi.
This form of attack –always in defense of dominant or mainstream narratives and the actions of governments and their corporate “partners” and always expressed in terms of “concern” employs pejorative terms such as “far right”, “white supremacist” without defining them adequately or at all.
We are never asked to consider what we understand by the term “far right” or how the label “conspiracy theory” – itself a category with a fascinating back story and history for employment by state powers to attack critics and deflect legitimate questioning – is being used and no attempt is made to define where the line lies between legitimate questions and analysis and more fantastical or “extremist” explanations of events.
It is the crazy people advocating outlandish ideas like the benefits of “natural immunity” — the benefits of supplements and immune health.
Now, the new villain is aspirin.
The science that was once settled is now being reset to the new normal where simple things like common sense are now longer in play.
As a result of their sins against “the science”, regardless of readily available statistics on the inefficacy of these “precautions” like vaccines — people who are confused are being punished for their insolence.
This is a technique that anyone who has been questioning the mainstream Covid narrative will be familiar with – having spent nearly two years being accused of wanting to kill grandma and murder the vulnerable: even in the face of mounting evidence that it is the state that has been engaged in the culling of these groups and which has certainly been responsible for their immiseration.
The thought process for this imputation of homicidal intent runs like this: masks, lockdowns and vaccines prevent transmission, transmission equals disease and disease equals death.
There is, of course, ample scientific evidence to question each stage of this chain of causation but hey, it is working and it is forcing employers, restaurant owners and schools to act against their own intuition.
Looking through the latest news, we can’t help but notice the date October 15 being brought up repeatedly in the context of mandatory vaccinations. Italy’s Green Pass is coming into force on October 15 and it’s also the deadline for US Federal contract employees to get the vax, for example.
But it’s not just at the federal level – many states, counties, universities and employers have taken on this seemingly arbitrary date as the deadline for vaccination – the drop dead date, if you will.
So what’s the deal with October 15th? Coincidence? Is this just pattern recognition run amok, or is there something significant about this date? Because it’s so widespread, is this an order coming from on high?
Don’t worry. I am not going to do the number crunching and reducing for some numerological formula — I can’t seem to find one, but the day should be long remembered in history as a type of mandatory judgement day.
It will be a day ling remembered as those who do not get the jab leave their jobs and others will begrudgingly be coerced into getting the jab because they were threatened with losing their jobs.
The broad definition of coercion is “the use of express or implied threats of violence or reprisal (as discharge from employment) or other intimidating behavior that puts a person in immediate fear of the consequences in order to compel that person to act against his or her will.” Actual violence, threats of violence, or other acts of pressure may constitute coercion if they’re used to subvert an individual’s free will or consent.
In legal terms, it’s often said that someone who’s been coerced was acting under duress. In fact, “duress” and “coercion” are often interchanged. Black’s Law Dictionary defines duress as “any unlawful threat or coercion used… to induce another to act [or to refrain from acting] in a manner [they] otherwise would not [or would].”
It’s not always easy to tell when the line between subtle intimidation and coercion has been crossed and even harder to prove.
It is a convenient trick that can be manipulated on the day of judgment.
But this is all based in coercion — and again we need to remember that the ones that oppress you and threaten you are the bad guys. There has been no time in history where the good guys would force people to do anything against their will.
I hope history will note this accordingly and that our progeny marvel how we didn’t rise up in protest or with a massive strike — most everyone under threat were blackmailed into losing their agency, their dignity, and their livelihoods.
It is hard to stand up to bullying and haranguing. I understand that– there were too many that were seeking after their badge of obedience and with a little bit of virtue signaling and peer pressure we have been led to a point where safety theater is mandatory.
It may give the true believers a warm feeling to know that they are part of a bigger cause — that they were not selfish and that they were above it all. I mean all you have to do is ask a true believer and he will tell you just how wonderful and unselfish they are and that those who do not wish to comply deserve death.
The true believers were first in line to get injected. The first in line to get re-injected. they cried tears of joy when they got what they thought was a cure . They couldn’t wait to get the booster injection and another and another and another. We have been told you can’t be too careful — the invisible entity will kill you.
Many that have willfully and blindly accepted this tyranny have not bothered to conduct independent research outside the authorized avenues of deception; read peer-reviewed scientific literature not funded by the pharmaceutical drug cartel; or critically evaluate the press releases being parroted by your “trusted leaders,” “experts,” and media mouthpieces.
They just trust the so-called science that was first touted by a Malthusian billionaire. Then from a bought and sold Dr, that is the darling of the pharmaceutical companies. CNN even consulted the former head of Planned Parenthood to encourage people to get the vaccine — funny how people who are into culling the population are demanding compliance.
But this should not be questioned — the enemy of the state is questions.
You are mandated to have to have zealous, unwavering faith in the system. You are brainwashed into trusting the science, You are to deem anything that falls beyond the margins of the approved narrative “misinformation,” “conspiracy theory,” or “fake news.”
This is the new normal — and it was easy to implement — it was easy for the controllers to put pods under beds patiently waiting for people to slip into unconsciousness and then awaken to a woke world where the extremists make the rules and the people are to afraid to question those arbitrary mandates.
The New Normal also requires you to present proof that you are not genetically inclined to spread the new plague otherwise you will be excluded from public activities, deprived of employment, denied access to health care, stripped of your right to protest, bullied into submission, and quarantined.
To just say all of this makes me cringe — because I know that this is not the America that I was raised in –and now that I have advanced in years, I am realizing that my patriotism and rebellious spirit has been rendered irrelevant.
Look at how far we have fallen in this country.
Look how many of your rights many Americans have voluntarily relinquished, how many values they have voluntarily dumped along the way—in the name of safety, in the name of security, in the name of health, in the name of the public good.
But this is not a problem because there are no more sins to weigh you down on Mandatory Judgment Day.
That is, if you are true believer.
Mandatory Judgment Day and those at the top of the technocracy who have instigated it are getting really tired of people crying out about their freedoms.
How dare they? This is an emergency—an unprecedented, incalculable, catastrophic worldwide crisis—and we will never get back to normal if they keep stubbornly insisting on preserving liberty and normal life.
If you were to put yourself in past, maybe 30 years ago and I was a time traveler– I could tell the world that it was brought to a halt and our freedoms suspended at the whim of its leaders for a phenomenon human had been living with and adapting to in countless variations for millennia, you would think I was describing a dystopian fiction.
You would say to me — why would you be talking about something that is science fiction — it does not apply and it makes no sense — America would never surrender their rights — they would never allow for leaders to coerce and blackmail its citizens.
Think back to a couple of years ago—the Summer of 2019, let’s say. What were you doing then? What was your life like? How did you feel about your past, present, and future? What did you care about? How did you spend your time? What were your core values? What would you think about how you think, feel, and behave today?
Well, here we are in 2021 and we are languishing — that point in our lives when we are not quite depressed but barely have enough energy to care anymore.
Do you feel your humanity slipping away? Do you doubt your future and your success after all of this has passed?
This is not about who is politically better or worse, this is not about who is selfish or not — this is about rational versus irrational.
I’m speaking to everyone who persists in uncritically accepting the rationales being given for the great reset which literally is the remaking of our world into an open-air prison.
I’m speaking to everyone who is sleepwalking into their own enslavement without a second thought, without even the willingness to examine the situation from a perspective outside the one they’ve been programmed to believe.
The government has succeeded in convincing people that those who are not vaccinated are an enemy — a bioweapon that is infecting even those who have been inoculated. Human bioweapons creating a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Has a nice marketing ring to it doesn’t it? Without the marketing propaganda we wouldn’t have started perceiving our fellow human beings as bioweapons to be shamed, ostracized, and eliminated.
Medical segregation that further divides an already fragmented populace, making us ever easier to control. The psychological trauma of this isolation and splintering is incalculable, and the full extent of the damage will likely not be comprehended for decades.
Does this even make sense? Why can’t they just admit that they do not know what they are doing and that they are pushing their mandatory judgement day because they are not willing to give up the power, they have over us.
Two years ago hugging, smiling, kissing, and singing was okay to do — now it is being criminalized. Contagious diseases existed then, too. But we hadn’t yet been conditioned to fear one another’s physical presence.
Dehumanization is far more effective when we cannot see each other’s faces, touch each other’s hands, speak in person, or embrace.
Every aspect of the regulations being unleashed in the global judgement day is designed to separate us, creating an apartheid system that outlaws dissent and encourages the persecution of those who question the State.
Please remember the humanity of those you’re being progressively conditioned to revile—to the point that you become okay with them being fined, excluded from access to necessities, arrested, and held in captivity. You want to think that it is not happening here and that It’s happening elsewhere. Don’t delude yourself into thinking it can’t happen here — it is happening here –and you may think that of you follow all the rules they won’t come after you — but you are wrong.
All the technocrats and bought off scientists have to do is impute murderous intent to all who fail to comply with the edicts of the biosecurity state. They can pull the same tactics to coerce you into getting whatever medical procedure they deem necessary.
The jab is only the beginning.
I would suppose that the next arrow in their quiver would be the ideology of “net zero” – which would likely result in innumerable deaths from starvation and exposure to cold– we need to enforce dark winter to all those who have the audacity to waste energy in order to heat their homes in the cold months.
All for the greater good right? if you don’t support that cause — you are murdering your children and those children after them — you are contributing to the end of the world– you are committing heresy in the face of settled science.
Settled science that could not make up their minds about the smoking cigarettes, or the cholesterol in eggs, or Thalidomide — now it is aspirin that is the enemy.
Looking back in history at the Nuremberg Trials, it was not homeopathic practitioners who stood trial for crimes against humanity, it was the allopathic doctors who had carried out medical experiments on the inmates of concentration camps.
And the Nuremberg Code did not set out prohibitions against “natural healing” but rather, against the administration of experimental pharmaceutical products to individuals without their informed consent.
You may say –“well it is different – we are not in a concentration camp.” Well, I agree but we decided to voluntary put ourselves under house, arrest and it looks as if people are now being coerced into putting something in their bodies that they don’t want.
Wouldn’t that be considered a crime against humanity? Against agency? Against freedom?
I am not an anti-vaxxer — the vaccine should be a choice and those who do not want it should not have to get it in order to function in normal society.