While scientists still predominantly believe the COVID-19 virus occurred naturally in animals and spread to humans in an outbreak at a market in Wuhan, China, the US Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence is now the second tentacle of the US government intelligence apparatus, along with the FBI, that endorses the “lab leak theory” – the minority view that the virus occurred as a result of work in a Chinese lab. The Wall Street Journal recently reported this narrative, which is really being used as a tool for mass manipulation. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks with Dr. Lee Merritt about I’M LIVING ON A CHINESE ROCK.
SHOW SAMPLE:
SHOW PODCAST:
https://aftermath.media/podcast/3-1-23-im-living-on-a-chinese-rock-w-dr-lee-merritt/
SHOW TRANSCRIPT:
Science has a lot to teach us about what the relevant facts are and how they are best accounted for in areas of specialized knowledge, but there are no grounds for believing that when scientists venture into social and political thought that their conclusions are any better than those of the next guy you meet at the bus stop.
It is always interesting to me how public opinion and the opinions of the mainstream media often clash and when people want to express their frustration there is always someone who wishes to police those thoughts because they claim to be experts.
They never say what expertise they have only that they knew someone, that knows someone, who had the experience and so through the art of osmosis they have somehow cracked the code – or that they are efficient at reciting the vapid talking points given on CNN.
People love their various echo chambers – because they will gladly pay for or even participate in reading up on things they already know.
But what happens when the narrative abruptly changes and all that we think is going to be said – is said differently, or is denies or otherwise changes overnight.
This again proves that public opinion isn’t always right and that science is not necessarily settled.
I know that there are a group of people out there that say they do not watch Saturday Night Live because they believe it isn’t funny or too liberal.
But it is subtly evolving and is becoming more satirical and a lot less cruel about conservative and liberal issues.
Yes, they are overall liberal undefined but sometimes things go under the radar and now the media is attacking the monologues for being less liberal and more biting in their satire.
A case in point is that last week Woody Harrelson appeared on SNL and completely tore into Big Pharma by telling a story about a script that he was sent that he turned down.
“So, the movie goes like this: the biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel’s drugs and keep taking them over and over,” said Harrelson.
The audience was unsure how to react.
The punchline was “I threw the script away. I mean, who is gonna believe that crazy idea? Being forced to do drugs? I do them voluntarily all day long.”
The liberal media attacked Harrelson -even though he has supported many liberal causes.
But besides that undefined Harrelson has publicly questioned the legitimacy of 9/11 as a terrorist attack, claimed there may be a connection between 5G networks and COVID-19 and has called wearing masks during the pandemic “absurd.”
Harrelson’s joke became the subject of fierce debate online. Many social media users with anti-vaccine beliefs praised Harrelson. Others felt the joke was a harmful means of spreading false, anti-science rhetoric about the COVID-19 pandemic.
Again we have to remind the sensitive sheep out there that this is a classic example of satirical humor to make a very good point.
The media is so irrelevant and unaware that people are tired of all of the lies that are being used to create an agreed upon narrative undefined that some people just donundefinedt agree with.
I donundefinedt know if the average person is connecting the dots or is noticing, but there appears to be a pattern of abruptly throwing into mainstream thought a kind of double-think when it comes to what would be called conspiracy theory being owned and retooled in the mainstream press.
We all know that the UFO/UAP controversy is being renamed or that the narrative has been retooled by the military and the Pentagon which has left many people in the UFO community shouting from the rafters that the half-assed admission of UFOs being supernatural machines is in fact a psy-op.
it is a psychological operation to create a sense of doublethink where the public is forced to hold two opinions at once on a certain subject.
Double-think is the ability to maintain two contradictory ideas in oneundefineds head simultaneously and believe them both to be true.
It functions as a psychological mechanism that explains peopleundefineds willingness to accept control over their memories and their past.
The mind eventually will remember holding one thought and then eventually accepting the thoughts and propaganda of the controllers.
it is a basic mind control technique.
Orwell defines doublethink as, To know and to not know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions that canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it.
It creates cognitive dissonance,
It is like saying we live in a democracy -and at the same time saying that there is no one left to defend or maintain it.
it is like saying that we live in a constitutional republic when the republic does nothing to maintain the values that exist in that said constitution.
You are told to forget what is necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself.
I always say you should never underestimate the power of patterns in the reporting of certain stories because at times they can be interpreted as being part of some grand revelation of the method – which is something I talk about form time to time.
For those who are unaware of this revelation concept, it is proposed in most conspiracy theorist circles that some event of great importance is not carried out by the “powers that be” without a warning whether it is covert or overt.
It is a tool of Illuminati psychodrama. It usually is a concept linked to some nefarious group that has a big scheme in the works that brings trauma to the people.
Used casually, the implication is always the same: when the Cryptocracy commits major crimes, they will broadcast their intentions in advance, through popular movies and television or they will give warnings in news stories that are either delivered o Friday evening which is dumping day or are buried in the back pages of the newspaper.
Within the Revelation of the Method, we can see predictive models that are used to program and steer the populace into realizing that there are many things that are coming to the future that will shock many people.
The order of such a process is still in doubt and most of what is shown as a predictive programming example is usually offered in hindsight.
The mainstream media wants you to believe that the events of January 6th were a coup- and they have been saying it so much that they believe it. A lot of the public believes it, and eventually, over time the belief may disappear with people making solid arguments that it is a big lie that the media wanted you to believe in order to vilify those who wanted answers about an election.
This will be done out of convenience, only to be brought back again and again and again undefined to restore the hollow selling by grifters to history.
The reason this is so important to illustrate is that the U.S. Energy Department reportedly became the second government agency Sunday to conclude the coronavirus probably leaked from a lab rather than jumping from animals to humans naturally, a “low confidence” conclusion that lends more attention to a belief that was once considered—and by some, still is—to be little more than an insensitive and racist conspiracy theory.
While scientists still predominantly believe the virus occurred naturally in animals and spread to humans in an outbreak at a market in Wuhan, China, the US Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence is now the second tentacle of the US government intelligence apparatus, along with the FBI, that endorses the “lab leak theory” – the minority view that the virus occurred as a result of work in a Chinese lab.
The dispute over COVID-19’s origins has become increasingly acrimonious, with warring camps of scientists trading personal insults on Twitter feeds.
Natural-origin proponents argue that the virus, like so many before it, emerged from the well-known phenomenon of natural spillover, jumping from a bat host to an intermediate species before going on to infect humans. Those suspecting a lab-related incident point to an array of possible scenarios, from inadvertent exposure of a scientist during field research to the accidental release of a natural or manipulated strain during laboratory work.
As COVID-19 rampaged across the globe, the Chinese government’s commitment to transparency turned out to be limited. It has refused to share raw data from early patient cases, or participate in any further international efforts to investigate the virus’s origin.
And in September 2019, three months before the officially recognized start of the pandemic, the Wuhan Institute of Virology took down its database of some 22,000 virus samples and sequences, refusing to restore it despite international requests.
Immediately the mainstream media pounced on anyone even speculating about a possible lab leak. Calling the theory, baseless, racist and destructive.
But now it is being discussed again to create confusion. If you want to control a narrative you have to get your stories straight and based on convenience that story may be used as propaganda against China.
Case in point undefined no one was allowed to think that COVID-19 was an intentional release from a lab in China undefined until China began saying that it would help Russia in its battle against Ukraine.
The Energy Department now joins the Federal Bureau of Investigation in saying the virus likely spread via a mishap at a Chinese laboratory. Four other agencies, along with a national intelligence panel, still judge that it was likely the result of a natural transmission, and two are undecided.
The Energy Department’s conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S. national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research.
Keep in mind that the so called Lab leak hypothesis has been released with undefinedLow confidence.undefined This gives them a way to back out of the claim at any moment.
The belief that COVID itself was a new virus or various beliefs in viruses created for biological warfare serves some purpose for those who give it reality by their weaponizing of it or defenses against it.
All of which shift and change with shifting purposes and meanings that then mean whatever circumstance dictates.
What was it that Humpty Dumpty said to Alice in Alice in Wonderland?
‘When I use a word, Humpty said, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean–neither more nor less.’
‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master–that’s all’
There is a theory that politicians speak in what can be called private language undefined where they leave open the interpretation of words that describe an event undefined like when we heard the word terrorist, it was always a description of a Muslim as even American school shootings and mall shootings were acts of terrorism.
So Alice’s skepticism about Humpty’s ability to decide for himself what words mean is well-founded. But Humpty’s response is interesting. He says it comes down to ‘which is to be master.’ Presumably, he means: are we to master language, or is language to master us?
Words create thoughts, repetitive lies become truth if it resonates with certain groups and soon they too begin speaking in private language and use dog whistles to generate an equal result in the group think.
It is unwise to make a claim we are not willing to substantiate, and thus become entangled by those who readily set endless hoops to go through while shifting the parameters to use up our resources.
But when others make claims and set them as basis for imposing zero tolerance for modelled risk, then they are to be required to substantiate their claims.
We should demand these criteria for things kike Climate Change and the forced use of vaccines, that are untested that we have been told were to cure this phantom virus.
They did not cure anything undefined and the virus itself now becomes suspect just like it always has- which then leaves open the possibility for yet another change in the narrative.
Again, the basic conspiracy theory is that Covid never existed in the first place. Will that even enter into the narrative? I highly doubt it undefined because we need a phantom devil to always use when we need to speak of settled science.
With the new narrative of the lab leaks this again proves Settled science and official narratives to be a total fallacy.
This proves that fact-checkers are an utter joke.
Losing the existence of COVID-19, everything else in the narrative swirls down the drain. This would mean that the rt-PCR test was fake, the fake reasons for lockdowns that killed the economy, the fake reasons for wearing masks, the fake debate between whether the fake “novel virus” originated with a love match between a bat and a pangolin or that it was a gain-of-function at the Wuhan Lab of fake Virology, killing people in hospitals by the thousands with Remdesivir and ventilators, and most of all, the need to inject billions of arms around the world with this deliberately toxic, “spike protein” bioweapons.
Wouldnundefinedt that be a test of wills- and create a confused and betrayed world population. What about the death tolls, the vaccine campaigns, the coercion- could it be that it was all done to test the will of the people to stand up against tyranny?
And of course, we failed that test. Because now we have been forced into double-think undefined forced to live on a Chinese rock.
This is just the latest step in the lab-leak theory’s remarkable journey from fringe idea to mainstream position, or from “conspiracy theory to government debate”,
Further, it can now be used as fuel for the “new cold war” narrative. As China has decided to choose the wrong side in this never-ending war.
The US can blame China for creating the virus, while China can either claim it was natural or that the US released it in an act of “bio-terrorism”.
Both sides will claim the other side’s vaccines don’t work, but that theirs do. And, make no mistake, both sides will still very much want to vaccinate everyone.
In some ways, this is a symptom of the failure of the Covid narrative. The greatest propaganda push of all time ran out of steam just two years in and is suddenly fighting defensively simply to hold itself together.
Because the “lab leak” debate is very much a fallback position. A retreat in good order, protecting – at all costs – the fundamental lies of “Covid” and adding more fuel to the narrative of doublethink and needless criticism of those who are fed up with the lies.
Further, every other admission preserves the idea that while governments might lie, they might manipulate, they might “panic”, they might be incompetent, they might be corrupt, they may even do quite obscene things, but it was for the public good undefined because it was a lab leak.
The powers that be are turning COVID-19 and its origins into a worldwide April Foolundefineds joke.
Hopefully, the US Department of Energy and the Wall Street Journal throwing their collective weight behind the “lab-leak” theory finally wakes people up to what it really is and always has been.
A tool of mass manipulation.
undefined
SHOW GUEST: DR. LEE MERRITT
Dr. Lee Merritt began her medical career at the age of four, carrying her father’s “black bag” on house calls, along the back roads of Iowa. In 1980 she graduated from the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry in New York, where she was elected to life membership in the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society.
Dr. Merritt completed an Orthopedic Surgery Residency in the United States Navy, served 9 years as a Navy physician and surgeon, and has been in the private practice of Orthopedics and Spinal Surgery since 1995. She has served on the Board of the Arizona Medical Association, is past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and was a medical Consultant on the Navy Research Advisory Committee. During that time she studied defense and readiness against atomic chemical and biological warfare.
