MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
Yesterday morning my wife came downstairs and turned on the TV – she wanted to see the Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. My wife met me just after she left England to come back to the states. She obviously had a curiosity about what would be said in the interview.
I only half-listened as I was preparing my show. After she left for work, I went back and analyzed the interview and as I was watching, I couldn’t help but notice that Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, paid tribute to Princess Diana by wearing a piece of her jewelry.
I felt a bit creeped out by that move. Meghan can be seen wearing the diamond tennis bracelet once owned by her late mother-in-law.The item was worn in public by Diana several times prior to her death. Harry is thought to have taken stones from the very same bracelet to produce the engagement ring he proposed to Megan with in 2017.
It’s not the first time that Meghan has worn the bracelet, having appeared to do so during a royal tour in 2018. She also wore a ring owned by Harry’s mother before the pair’s wedding reception that same year.
Meghan has also been seen wearing similar fashions that Diana chose — and all the while as I was watching the interview, I could not help but wonder is Meghan was tempting fate.
As many of you may well know, I have worked on at least one book about the Royals with Tracy Twyman and I was featured in Rolling Stone magazine about my research that the Antichrist may come from the Royal Family.
It can either be Prince Charles or Prince William.
We are already hearing that Prince Charles is one of the founders of the “Great Reset” and attempt by the World Economic Forum to re-imagine the world with a world economy, a world government, and a world religion.
The Pope is also supportive of these moves and has planned a trip to Iraq in order to make his pilgrimage of peace.
Many people say that they believe that Pope Francis is the last Pope or that he may be the fabled False Prophet spoken of in the Book of Revelation.
It is important however to understand that according to the Bible the Antichrist has to have an impressive pedigree that makes him a counterfeit messiah that rules over what is called an imperial cult – a world order that is promised as a way to create peace and eliminate suffering.
The Imperial cult of ancient Rome identified emperors and some members of their families with the divinely sanctioned authority of the Roman State. Its framework was based on Roman and Greek precedents and was formulated during the early Principate of Augustus. It was rapidly established throughout the Empire and its provinces, with marked local variations in its reception and expression.
Augustus’s reforms transformed Rome’s Republican system of government to a de facto monarchy, couched in traditional Roman practices and Republican values.
A deceased emperor held worthy of the honor could be voted a state divinity by the Senate and elevated as such in an act of apotheosis. The granting of apotheosis means that they made him the equivalent of god on earth.
Although emperors were largely defined by the political and military powers they held, there was also the religious aspect of their role which helped give then authority in the religious sphere of public life.
As Christianity rose to prominence it challenged the established place of the emperor in the religious life of the Empire, and eventually supplanted the pagan ideal of an emperor with its own Christian notion of a god-appointed ruler. This idea became embedded in Christian Roman religious thought, although significant vestiges also remained of the pagan past.
This of course led to the creation of the papacy where the Pope is considered the Vicar of Christ. Needless to say that Pope Francis also has been deemed a candidate for the Antichrist because of this reason. His many policies and ideas to unite the Catholic faith with Islam have been highly controversial which has fueled the resolve of those who are sedavacanists.
Sedevacantism is the position held by some people who identify as Catholic that the present Bishop of Rome is not truly the pope due to the mainstream church’s espousal of what they see as the heresy of modernism and that, for lack of a valid pope, the Holy See has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII.
Despite the apparent success of the Imperial cult as an Empire-spanning cult, it cannot really be argued that the Imperial cult was ever a strong enough religious institution in its own right to stand against the rise of Christianity. However, as a political instrument it was indispensable, and as such its religious nature would be subject to change if this was necessary for its survival and this precluded the friction that one may have expected between Christianity and a pagan cult.
None of these pagan cults, nor the so-called divinity of its leaders could compete against Christianity as a whole but the power of the leaders prevailed and their divinity was preserved in order to establish a new Roman empire.
Roman Britain or, later, Britannia, “the Britains” was the area of the island of Great Britain that was governed by the Roman Empire, from 43 to 410 AD. It comprised almost the whole of England and Wales and, for a short period, southern Scotland.
The promise was to make the British Empire a new Roman Empire with leadership that included a Monarchial Cult. This new order would be supervised by a chosen leader who claims his lineage to the Roman emperors and even Jesus Christ himself.
The royal families of Europe are vast and diverse, with each family possessing different titles and powers. But one thing they do have in common is a shared ancestor.
While the family trees are complicated, and there are many ways that Europe’s royals are all related to each other, one of the simplest is to look at King George II, who was the King of Great Britain and Ireland from 1727 until 1760.
George’s ancestors now head Europe’s royal families, as his children and grandchildren married royals from around the continent. Their mysterious lineage and bloodlines are a matter of legend – some claim that these bloodlines go all the way back to Joseph of Amalthea – while there are others who believe that after Jesus crucifixion, he took a long trip to Gaul, which is now France and sired children.
This idea has been called the Jesus Christ conspiracy as it ties the royal families to the bloodlines directly connected to Jesus –and with that claim we now see the Royal family of England still in existence today as the head of the Church.
However, the Monarchy has been in the cross-hairs of controversy and within the walls of the palace there are rituals, acts and even ceremonies that some consider Satanic in nature and with these irreverent acts comes the promise of the sun never setting om the British empire and the throne being warmed and prepared for what Arthurians call “The Once and Future King: literally, the King and Savior of the World Order.
Some who claim divinity and others that hope you do not find out that they secretly believe that they have divine righto rule and establish an imperial cult.
All of the mystical secrecy is connected to the secret of the Holy Grail, the alleged bloodline descendants of Christ and that according to these secret societies Christ’s death was not divine nor an atonement for Salvation.
Therefore, the secret that is being held by the elite of this world is that through the myth of righteous blood they hold the power to bring into the world a man that they can purport to trace the bloodline’s to the House of David and call him the Divine Ruler of the New Age.
One of those in the elite position of Divine Rite is Prince Charles who along with his mother the Queen believe in what is called British Israelism. They believe that they are the true heirs of Israel and have the divine rite bloodline directly from King David.
There are many people in the United States that do not get the obsession that some people have about the Royals and all of their scandals. However, the interest for some goes deeper down the rabbit hole as the Royals have somehow established a form of blood cement over the ages and with that blood have sealed their mystical hold on some of the public, making them a subject of the tabloids– they are legends by heritage and Gods in their own minds.
They are counterfeit saviors — and one day there will be a King that will reign and when he does some may say that he will be the chosen Rex Mundi — the King of the World Order.
There also seems to be an obsession in the mainstream narrative with bloodlines, royal connections, the mingling of commoner blood with royal blood and the idea of divine rite because of religious or ethnic background.
It seems like there’s a religion for every person, and a deity for every religion. Those deities range from all-powerful beings to celestial objects to seasons to animals to visitors from other planets to Prince Philip.
That is right – there is a religious order that worships Great Britain’s Duke of Edinburgh as their deity. Well, they did until learning that the 99-year-old husband of Elizabeth II was in the hospital. Now, plans are in place to move on to worshiping Prince Charles, royal son and next in line to the throne. Why did they worship Philip and what might Charles have to do to prove his godliness?
South Pacific island of Tanna, where an estimated 700 of its 29,000 inhabitants worship the royal as a god.
The tribesmen in the village of Yaohnanen — a tropical rainforest with spotty communications — believe the husband of Queen Elizabeth II is descended from an ancestral spirit who watches over them.
The movement is similar to the post-WWII “cargo cults” where natives of various Pacific islands attributed the delivery of goods from more technologically advanced societies to certain rituals.
The followers, some of whom still wear traditional grass skirts, treasure a small collection of gifts from Prince Philip who has gone along with [the attention] and is very flattered by it.
Once again, we see that primitive tribesman and some of the highest of elites see the royals as Gods — and the Royal families have been known to keep secrets,
However, when Prince Charles decided to look for a bride that was considered an outsider there was turbulence, much like what we are hearing from Prince Harry and his wife Megan, who is not only an outsider but a woman of mixed race.
Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, is one of the most talked about people of recent years and according to a recent Interview with Oprah Winfrey it’s taken a heavy toll on her. The story is similar to what happened to her late mother-in-law, Princess Diana, in her struggle with the press juts over 25 years ago. Both women fought against the royal family—Diana became famous in clashes with advisers and they story seems to repeating itself with Meghan and Prince Harry.
Meghan’s openness, in the opposite direction of the royal family’s normal reservedness, resembles Diana’s revolutionary confessional with Martin Bashir in November 1995. “When no one listens to you, or you feel no one’s listening to you, all sorts of things start to happen,” Diana said at the time.
And although Meghan may feel isolated in her experience, her mother-in-law had done it all before.
At first it seemed like a dream for both women—the world media fell in love with Diana, and later Meghan, for her Hollywood connection and refreshing honesty. While Diana was only 19 years old when she became engaged, however, Meghan was the opposite, at 36 years old and previously divorced.
Despite the palace telling her that the press and public interest would wane, Diana first understood its impact on her Australia tour in 1983, when a million people showed up to see her and Prince Charles.
This incident was later compared again as a repeat of history according to Harry as he explained to Oprah that he feared that synchronicity was all too familiar.
Coincidentally, it was also during a trip that Meghan realized her popularity. On her and Prince Harry’s tour in 2018, all eyes were on the couple, but it was after this trip that they felt that the palace did not appreciate them.
Adjusting to the royal family would prove to be impossible for both women. In her Panorama interview, Diana spoke about her struggle with bulimia and depression, saying it was “pretty devastating…feeling of being no good at anything and being useless and hopeless and failed in every direction.”
In one of the more titillating moments during the conversation, Diana admitted to a five-year affair with Major James Hewitt, an former cavalry officer in the British Army. Their relationship was tested when Hewitt deployed for the Gulf War, and they broke up for good after news coverage exposed them.
The most scandalous part of this affair? The media speculates that Hewitt is actually Prince Harry’s biological father. Many outlets note the similar facial features and prominent red hair. However, Hewitt insists the dates don’t match up; allegedly he and Diana did not begin their affair until after Harry was born.
Diana even attempted suicide, she threw herself down the stairs to get the attention of Prince Charles and in several interviews she spoke of how she felt the Royals didn’t even appear to be human beings.
Meghan had confessed the same thing to Oprah. The Duchess of Sussex said she had asked officials at Buckingham Palace for medical help but was told it would damage the institution. According to Megan members of the family told Harry and Meghan, that they did not want the couple’s unborn child, Archie, to be a prince, and expressed concerns about how dark the color of the baby’s skin would be.
Buckingham Palace claim that it was Harry that decided to distance himself and move to California but that is obviously not true. The palace stripped Harry of all his patronages which means he will not get any kind of military pension.
Harry’s son is the grandson of the future king and heir apparent and the nephew of the second in line, so Harry’s baby is automatically a Prince. However, the Palace have made it clear that Harry’s baby will not be a Prince when his grandfather becomes king, not now, not at any time ever. So the baby has had HRH credentials ripped from him.
So far, Harry and Megan have stayed together among the chaos they claim they have been subjected to.
Prince Charles and Diana separated in 1992, but it would be a long and complicated process until they divorced in 1996. A year later, Diana’s life ended at age 36, when she died in Paris due to injuries sustained in a car accident.
Meghan’s journey from commoner to royalty and back was much faster—less than two years after saying “I do” at the wedding, she and Harry declared that they did not want the life of royalty anymore, making their Megxit in March 2020.
While many in the media were criticizing the interview stating that Meghan is a manipulative and has no business complaining about her problems when the world is suffering poverty and lockdown he real question is whether or not there is a danger of history repeating itself.
Many people believed that Princess Diana’s bold moves against the crown was what got her killed.
Ingrid Seward was told by Diana that she felt her life had been in danger” and that she was worried that it would be killed in a car crash because of brake failure. According to therapists and friends Diana was paranoid that Prince Phillip hated her and wanted her to disappear.”
“This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous—my husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car,” she wrote in 1993. “Brake failure & serious head injury….” How did she know?
Why is it that women that marry into he Royal family find themselves in situations where they need to get out, where they become suicidal or worse?
The royal family and Meghan Markle’s family are reacting to the interview she and Prince Harry did with Oprah Winfrey.
A statement from Buckingham Palace on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II was released on Tuesday. It said, “The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan. The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning. While some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately. Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved family members.”
Just hours earlier, Prince Charles ignored a question asking his reaction to the interview while he was making a public appearance. In the sit-down, which initially aired Sunday on CBS and drew 17 million viewers, Harry talked about his father refusing to take his phone calls when he and Megan decided to step down from their roles as senior family members due to feeling unprotected by the royal family. Harry also didn’t eliminate his father from the list of potential family members who allegedly discussed Archie’s skin tone.
While Charles was quiet, Meghan’s estranged father, Thomas Markle, who has sold stories about her to the U.K. tabloids, gave an interview dismissing Meghan’s claims she experienced racism, and her half-sister Samantha Markle, who wrote a tell-all book about the duchess, gave multiple scathing interviews.
Kate Middleton, the wife of Prince William has said nothing about her struggles – maybe it is for the best because Princess Diana proved that you do not double cross the crown – one has to wonder what the future holds for Meghan.