Recently, Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that there are chemical and biological weapons in Ukraine. Her confession does shed critical light on several important issues and raises vital questions that deserve answers. Who is funding the Bio-labs? How much of a threat are they to neighboring countries? This startling revelation should vindicate so-called conspiracy theorists who insist that fact-checkers have some sort of penchant for attacking anyone that wishes to go into the margins of the mainstream narrative and report what they see as a potential problem in this war of disinformation. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks with military and security analyst, James Ponder about BIO ILLOGICAL.
One of the things that I think that is often overlooked by the media and by those who should know better is accountability. We find ourselves in a situation where we are cajoled into following the science, rather than questioning its motives. We do not hold scientists accountable when they do bad things or disseminate bad science.
We have now had two weeks of quiet in the issue of COVID 19 — and much like the 911 truth movement I can predict a similar movement where so-called conspiracy theorists will challenge the so-called science and demand some sort of accountability for keeping a lid on various gain of function exercises and the inefficiency of the vaccines and how they handled the whole affair. there will continue to be inquiries as to whether or not COVID-19 was a biological weapon that was released and how it targeted, the elderly and those with comorbidities that were certainly a burden on society.
The genetic profiling also raises a red flag for those who know history and understand that the genome is like a fingerprint that can be used against you by a mad scientist that has no accountability for hos crimes against humanity.
In modern society, the problem of accountability is too often “solved” by dividing it: the acts of innovation and creativity are separated from the responsibility for those acts.
The concept of responsibility is removed from the scientist and researcher and allocated to the professional “ethicist.” This kind of offloading of responsibility is precisely what led to cadres of otherwise brilliant scientists working day and night on the Manhattan Project to create a nuclear bomb while the ethical consideration whether it was right to devise such a weapon (let alone use it under the circumstances) was wrongly delegated to others.
The “others” were the leadership elites, the politicians and the generals who, history has proven, are too often the most egoistical, the most fraught with ulterior motives, the most psychologically unfit and the most ethically challenged.
History has shown us that when there is dirty work that needs to be done those who are in charge never get their hands dirty — they delegate the dirty Jobs to others. Form the time Pontius Pilate washed hos hands of the matter of Jesus’ crucifixion we see that deference to the people has always been their modus operandi.
Then comes the spin from the media and in some cases the historians.
It is important to keep in mind that the Pharaohs did not build the pyramids with their own hands. Hitler did not personally march the Jews into Dachau, No generals dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. Kissinger did not personally murder Salvador Allende nor did Nixon napalm kids in Vietnam.
What needs to be remembered here is that these so-called “great and terrible leaders had the ability to get the dirty jobs done by getting others to do their job for them.
The ugly tasks of doing dirty deeds have always been done by others.
Leaders have no specific “know-how” they are just wealthy psychopaths with the right kind of bloodline who have the ability to dominate others. There is always something about the bloodline and blood cement that is used to solidify their power.
They say that it is all in the DNA and that those who are biologically superior are those that are meant to lead — the rest of us have seen as fresh meat for the grinder– the bottom feeders that will be the useful idiots in their schemes of control.
Hitler’s final solution was to sift the human material. Those who did not comply or were seen as a burden to resources were eliminated — all because they did not have the purity necessary to stand next to Germans that had the Aryan DNA.
It was all selective and as time has progressed some 70 years later we now see how biological weapons and genotyping pathogens are the new final solution in this era of warfare.
The indisputable reality is that despite long-standing international conventions banning the development of biological weapons all large, powerful countries conduct research that, at the very least, has the capacity to be converted into biological weapons. The work conducted under the guise of “defensive research” can, and sometimes is, easily converted into the banned weapons themselves.
Now with the popularity of DNA registries, these weapons come highly advanced and can target certain victims by genetic traits.
We have from time to time warned people about DNA registries and how they can be used for both good and evil.
Among the ethical concerns of having, one’s DNA in a registry are, first of all, privacy and the fact that for forensic purposes DNA evidence is not 100%; there is human bias in analysis, so innocent people might be linked to crimes.
There are many other reasons to eschew having your DNA in a database and that is the gathering of information that could lead to eugenics directives and genotype biological weapons that can used against certain groups that are seen as the enemy.
It is a horror that is far more terrifying than a nuclear explosion because nukes have a tendency to wipe out an area and vaporize anyone within a small radius– but biologicals can kill a population silently and with plausible deniability.
We are told to follow the science, listen to the scientists and not to speculate about the possibility that the pandemic you are living through is the result of mad science and treachery. There are scientists that have created monsters and there are scientists that like unleash them just to watch the world die.
Science has always dazzled the majority who regard it with simultaneous feelings of ignorance, awe, and fear. Perhaps that is why we have customarily given a free pass to everyone who wears a white lab coat, regardless of whether the scientist/doctor/researcher is a genius, a saint, a charlatan or a maniac.
We should be less automatic in our simple reverence for scientists and researchers, reserving adulation for those who genuinely benefit humankind and a healthy skepticism for all the rest.
German chemist Fritz Haber invented an efficient process to create ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen, thereby permitting the production of modern fertilizers needed for industrial farming. Fritz Haber also invented and personally supervised the first use of battlefield poison gas used to asphyxiate French soldiers in 1915. From there poison gas led to biological agents that were used and now we have genotype weapons that have been developed and some have speculated that COVID-19 was a biological pathogen that was either leaked or intentionally released to kill millions and level the economies of the world.
Now with the battle that is raging in Ukraine, there are fears that biological labs are being targeted for false flag attacks.
What is most interesting that after a search on Google about these bio labs you are told that they do not exist and that they are purely a fabrication of Russian propaganda.
This is not true and now the fact-checkers are beginning to show themselves as being flawed and certainly politically compromised and should be completely disbanded.
These bogus and utterly useless “fact-checkers” in the U.S. corporate press have spent two weeks mocking as disinformation and a false conspiracy theory the claim that Ukraine has biological weapons labs, either alone or with U.S. support.
There has always been the question of who makes them an authority on anything and now the fact checkers are even showing holes in their own propaganda.
Claims that Ukraine currently maintains dangerous biological weapons labs came from Russia as well as China. The Chinese Foreign Ministry this month claimed: “The US has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone.” The Russian Foreign Ministry asserted that “Russia obtained documents proving that Ukrainian biological laboratories located near Russian borders worked on the development of components of biological weapons.”
Such assertions deserve the same level of skepticism as U.S. denials: namely, none of it should be believed to be true or false absent evidence. Yet U.S. fact-checkers dutifully and reflexively sided with the U.S. Government to declare such claims “disinformation” and to mock them as QAnon conspiracy theories.
But these so-called claims of conspiracy theory were foiled when the neocon official that has been in charge of U.S. Policy in Ukraine testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said that the claims are indeed true.
So much for neutral high minded fact-checkers who just love every opportunity they can get to undermine independent reporting and dismiss it as a conspiracy theory.
Under Secretary of State, Victoria Nuland testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), hoping to debunk growing claims that there are chemical weapons labs in Ukraine, smugly asked Nuland: “Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?”
Rubio of course asked the question expecting her to say no so that it would provide proof that conspiracy tin foil hat-wearing MAGA mongrels are spreading disinformation. I am sure the purpose was to show everyone that all of these so-called bio illogical accusations were part of some Kremlin CCP plot.
But Nuland some reason gave her version of the truth which by all indications stunned Marco Rubio.
As soon as he realized the damage she was doing to the U.S. messaging campaign by telling the truth — interrupted her and demanded that she instead affirm that if a biological attack were to occur, everyone should be “100% sure” that it was Russia who did it. Grateful for the life raft, Nuland told Rubio he was right.
But Rubio’s clean-up act came too late. When asked whether Ukraine possesses “chemical or biological weapons,” Nuland did not deny this, at all.
It is Nuland’s extensive experience in wielding power in Washington that makes her confession so startling: it is the sort of thing people like her lie about and conceal, not admit. But now that she did admit it, it is crucial that this revelation not be buried and forgotten.
It should go without saying that the existence of a Ukrainian biological “research” program does not justify an invasion by Russia, let alone an attack as comprehensive and devastating as the one unfolding: no more than the existence of a similar biological program under Saddam Hussein would have rendered the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq justifiable. But Nuland’s confession does shed critical light on several important issues and raises vital questions that deserve answers.
It also should vindicate so-called conspiracy theorists that insist that fact-checkers have some sort of penchant for attacking anyone that wishes to go into the margins of the mainstream narrative and report what they see as a potential problem in this war of disinformation.
Any attempt to claim that Ukraine’s biological facilities are just benign and standard medical labs is negated by Nuland’s explicitly grave concern that “Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of” those facilities and that the U.S. Government, therefore, is, right this minute, “working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces.” Her statement tells us that these labs are dangerous and that if they are attacked or taken over they could be used in a way that is reminiscent of what went on Syria, or Iraq with accusations of biological weapons used on innocent civilians.
However, it needs to be repeated that last month on Ground Zero show called Officer DNA we reported that in 2017, the United States air force put out a request for samples of DNA and RNA from Russians and people of Russian descent. Their reasons were unclear. This story got very little coverage in the mainstream media…none, in fact.
Vladimir Putin had mentioned it in a speech, and there have been articles in the alternative media that have mentioned it, and some international networks such as Russia Today but mainstream news?
The Air Force put out a request entitled “Synovial Tissue samples” needed:
The memo stated that the samples “must be Caucasian and Russian”, and that they will “not consider” samples from Ukraine.
The lack of coverage of this issue in the mainstream media, while predictable, still serves to highlight how little objectivity our notionally free press really has. Can you imagine the headlines if Russia, China or Iran’s military had started doing research on American DNA samples?
This has raised suspicion that they have been developing a weapon that will target a certain ethnic group in Russia,
This has always been a serious concern for the Kremlin. The question is why were the fact checkers so quick to denounce this as disinformation or conspiracy theory –what do they have to hide?
And what has there been a convenient confession by one of the Orchestrators of the Ukrainian coup in 2014– and also her indication that these biolabs can be used in False Flag attacks carries out by the Russians.
What is in those Ukrainian biological labs that make them so worrisome and dangerous?
This is a dark and heavy subject to even talk about, let alone speculate about, without much coverage of this collection of DNA one can only develop some dark conspiracy theory about genotyping targets in the future.
For all the dismissive language used over the last two weeks by these so called “fact-checkers.”
According to reporter Glen Greenwald it is confirmed that the U.S. has worked with Ukraine, as recently as last year, in the “development of a bio-risk management culture; international research partnerships; and partner capacity for enhanced bio-security, bio-safety, and bio-surveillance measures.” The U.S. Embassy in Ukraine publicly boasted of its collaborative work with Ukraine “to consolidate and secure pathogens and toxins of security concern and to continue to ensure Ukraine can detect and report outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens before they pose security or stability threats.”
This joint US/Ukraine biological research is, of course, described by the State Department in the most unthreatening way possible. But that again prompts the question of why the U.S. would be so gravely concerned about benign and common research falling into Russian hands.
False flag attacks can be and are carried out on both sides but of course, if we are warned that one is in the making –will definitely be blamed on the Kremlin.
They are great motivators for more support –and possibly would bring in a unanimous okay for a No-Fly Zone which many claim would be a dealy move.
But history teaches us that biological attacks create sympathy for mounted attacks against our chosen enemies.
On the 4th of April 2017, a false flag chemical attack took place in the Syrian town of Khan Shaykhun, the blame immediately being placed on Damascus and resulting in the then-US administration of Donald Trump launching cruise missiles strikes on a Syrian government airbase three days later.
A highly provocative action, though one that just stopped short of the full-scale military intervention that the regime-change lobby had clamored for
Undeterred, the same tactic would be carried out a year later in the city of Douma, which again would result in the US, Britain, and France launching airstrikes against Syrian government targets, also just stopping short of a full-scale intervention.
Should a similar false flag operation take place in Ukraine, perhaps also involving chemical weapons or a nuclear reactor as Moscow itself has warned of in recent days, even a ‘limited’ strike against Russian military infrastructure would immediately place the world on an irreversible path to the gravest consequence of all – nuclear war.
SHOW GUEST: JAMES PONDER
In 2011, he was taught that the Iranian government-based cyber attackers were branching into all fields of attacks on Western sites (esp the US, UK, and Israel), including logic bombs, DDoS attacks, hidden malware, and ransomware.