Podcast Logo
hero

3/21/23: CANCER CON CARNE W/ ATOM BERGSTROM

Posted on March 21st, 2023 by Clyde Lewis

Alternative proteins are being gradually introduced into the populace and considered to be undefinedeco-friendlyundefined however, there is another agenda beyond undefinedsustainabilityundefined taking place. It is not just about eating insects and fake meat - it is about creating and maintaining a peasant class. All it takes are for scientists and doctors to say undefinedtry it undefined and most people will comply - from drugs to vaccines and now, synthetic food which includes GMOs and cancer-celled beef.  Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks with holistic health advocate,  Atom Bergstrom about CANCER CON CARNE.

SHOW SAMPLE:

SHOW PODCAST:

https://aftermath.media/podcast/3-21-23-cancer-con-carne-w-atom-bergstrom/

SHOW TRANSCRIPT:

I know I have addressed the issue of alternative proteins many times on this show. However, the more you investigate, the more you dig the more horrifying it becomes.

It is not just about eating insects and fake meat, it is about creating and maintaining a peasant class. We are seeing this in our cities with homeless and drug-riddled people walking the streets like Zombies.

The Peasant class is created as guinea pigs and most of the blame is placed on them by the Elite– We are told that they are the reason the country is going downhill – when they are the first indication that in due time a majority of people will find themselves in the peasant class being forced to accept and settle for anything that can give them just a tiny bit of sustenance, or anything to stay alive.

Drugs, food and clean water – are things we take for granted, however, the plan for the peasant class is well underway and those things will become harder to obtain.

We will be told that the planetundefineds resources are incapable of feeding the peasant class, so the alternatives are culling the populace, sifting the human material—and creating synthetic foods that fill the tummy but lack nutritive value.

Whatever position anyone takes, the fear-mongering by wars, illnesses everywhere, political clashes and so on, surely the NWO unity-wish will happen as the people in power, very elegantly are placed in positions in which they are protected by their hidden connections.

A worldwide unity of all, for “the common good”, can only happen if every country/state/government is in line with the mindset and concept.

Therefore, it’s very likely, that all the nonsensical contradictions by many leaders, and strange statements by experts as if they’re based on science to convince people to believe in everything, even when it’s an obvious lie, politicians behave like bullies when they don’t get their way and attempt at curtailing free speech and any information that will foil their plans for the Great Reset.

When this short era of insanity peaks, the world leaders will provide the “medication” and “sustenance” for all, trying to convince all if possible, that their “cure” by unity of the globe, is the right and good one. The only thing it really is - a deception trap.

It is time to expose it in its infancy – and people need to start taking the thought of government indoctrination seriously and in many cases fight for the truth and make sure they do not budge on these issues.

A teacher from Utahundefineds Nebo School district went viral for doling out an extra credit assignment encouraging students to eat insects for a lesson on climate change and claiming that doing so would alleviate some of the harm done by raising cattle and eating beef.

Teacher Kim Cutler asked in a video that aired on Fox news undefinedShould we be eating bugs?undefined and then she answered a definite yes because weundefinedre killing the world by raising cows and animals.undefined

The contentious climate change assignment instructed sixth graders to write an argumentative essay about the benefits of eating insects for protein instead of cattle since cows notoriously, according to the climate agenda, destroy the ozone layer by releasing methane gas.

Students were allegedly not permitted to take a different stance in their essays, however.

School district administrators defended the decision by claiming the assignment asked students to provide evidence supporting the viability of eating insects to save the planet.

Amanda Wright a concerned mother held a meeting with administrators.

undefinedHow come we canundefinedt state our opinion and write that we shouldnundefinedt be eating bugs?undefined Wright asked teacher Kim Cutler.

Cutler responded, undefinedBecause we donundefinedt have any evidence to support it.undefined

But shouldnundefinedt nutrition be a matter of choice? Rather than indoctrinating kids into eating bugs undefined shouldnundefinedt they be provided with other information that doesnundefinedt include eating like a peasant?

What has me curious is what is in the freezer at the teacherundefineds home.

Do a search on Google and you will find many favorable articles pushing the eating of bugs to combat climate change and to sustain another 2 billion people by 2050.

It’s definitely hard to overcome our innate aversion to creepy crawly things. Even the idea of insects in the same cabinet that our food is in disgusts us.

Insects are repulsive. Squirmy. A sign of filth and uncleanliness. Why would anyone eat them?

Well, countries with high populations and lower incomes eat bugs because it has been a part of their culture.

Asia and Africa, and even South and Central America eat bugs.

Good for them undefined but in order for us to share in the poverty and repugnancy of the Great Reset, your kids will be programmed into eating insects to save the planet.

Although insects have been consumed as food for generations in some parts of the world, there is still very little known about how they might affect our bodies.

It’s well known that food allergies are becoming an increasing problem. Eggs, shellfish, nuts, and milk, once considered so benign, are now common triggers for allergic reactions.

Insects have the same capacity to trigger allergic reactions as do crustaceans like shrimp and lobster.

This makes sense when you consider that insects and crustaceans are both classified as arthropods, meaning they have an exoskeleton and segmented bodies.

Many insects feed on decaying matter: rotting food, animal corpses, and human waste which are full of bacteria. This is a common danger associated with wild-caught insects.

In the early 1950s, it was found that a large number of people living in Malaysia had been infected by an intestinal “fluke,” or an infestation of harmful bacteria, which they had gotten from consuming dragonflies.

Exoskeletons or the chitins of bugs can contain antinutrients. Anti-nutrients are phytic acid, tannins, and lectins.

Some knowledge of insects is necessary in order to know which ones are good for you and which ones might kill you.

Bees and certain kinds of ants carry toxins inside of them in order to ward off predators. Those same toxins can be dangerous if you eat them.

Some kinds of beetles carry a metabolic steroid that can result in growth retardation, infertility, or the masculinization of females if it is consumed too frequently.

I have spoken many times against Bug eating as I see it as culturally inappropriate to eat bugs in the west undefined because we are relatively well off with eating nutrient-enriched food, fresh vegetables, dairy, and poultry. fish and beef.

But it appears the billionaires that are buying up farms and investing in meat substitutes are doing so in the hopes that laws will be made to eliminate beef and poultry farming because it is claimed that they produce greenhouse gasses that contribute to Climate Change.

But now, if you think eating bugs is disgusting and you still want to eat beef undefined you will have a choice, but the choice does not sound appetizing.

Bill Gates has been one of the chief critics of Dairy and cattle farming and so he is urging farmers to stop growing cattle and he wants consumers to switch to lab-grown synthetic beef.

Bill Gates made sizable investments in “synthetic meat” manufacturers, expecting to turn a nice profit.

Again while many of us already know the plans of Bill Gates undefined many people do not know that his plans have taken a turn.

In the future lab grown synthetic beef will be taken from bovine cells undefined but the science that is behind the new meat goes Beyond the impossible burger made of Mushrooms and Chickpeas.

The biotech process now includes taking samples of immortalized tumor cells.

That right the new breakthrough that has not yet been reported by the mainstream is that the new meat will be from cows undefined but it will be synthesized using immortal Bovine cancer cells.

These same cells are used to produce traditional vaccines.

Under the right conditions, animal cells can be grown in a petri dish, or even at scale in factories full of stainless-steel drums. For decades, companies such as Pfizer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson have cultured large volumes of cells to produce vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and other biotherapeutics. Now the idea is that we might as well eat these cells, too.

You see the idea of using cells from many cows is not practical because normal meat cells don’t just keep dividing forever.

To get the cell cultures to grow at rates big enough to power a business, several companies, including the Big Three pharmaceutical companies, are quietly using what are called immortalized cells, something most people have never eaten intentionally.

Immortalized cells are a staple of medical research, but they are, technically speaking, precancerous and can be, in some cases, fully cancerous.

Many may remember the story of the “HeLa line” made from the cervical cancer of Henrietta Lacks. Many of her cancer cells are being used today and they were extracted from Henrietta in 1951.

Mrs. Lacksundefined cells doubled every 20 to 24 hours.

Today, these incredible cells — nicknamed undefinedHeLaundefined cells, from the first two letters of her first and last names — are used to study the effects of toxins, drugs, hormones and viruses on the growth of cancer cells without experimenting on humans.

They have been used to test the effects of radiation and poisons, to study the human genome, to learn more about how viruses work, and to play a crucial role in the development of polio and COVID-19 vaccines.

Now “lab meat” and “cell line” suppliers grow meat from cancer tumor cells that are “immortalized”; in other words, their cells can endlessly replicate. This is why cancers never stop growing, after all.

Our bodies’ immune systems are designed to kill off and fight such abnormal and cancerous cells. Thus, cancers only take hold when immune systems weaken or the cancer cells learn to avoid immune reactions.

Cells become immortal in human bodies all the time, by mutating to bypass senescence—and mutating some more to evade the immune system, which generally tries to kill off such mutants.

The lab meat companies plan to sell those kinds of solid tumor cells to us to eat.

The “plant substitute” meat replacements, such as Beyond Meat, are based on pea or soy protein. As such, they are NOT related to these lab-grown cancer cell projects. Those plant products are not “meat” in any sense.

Also, There is no evidence that lab-grown meat will facilitate cancers. There is also no evidence that lab-grown meat will NOT cause cancers.

It is simply an unknown. So it is a gamble undefined and mad science is working on this meat made from immortal cancer cells for our future consumption.

I am sure that one way or another, Bill Gates and the WEF will lobby for a change in rules so that they can sell us solid tumors as “lab-grown meat.

So you would have three choices, eat the bugs, eat the immortalized cancer cells undefined or go vegan.

Nearly every large meat and dairy processor/manufacturer has also acquired or developed plant-based meat and dairy substitutes

This “protein” industry convergence is jeopardizing the resilience of the food system and reducing genetic diversity of livestock and crops

When you factor in soy products as well as the use of conventional energy sources, lab-grown meat may be worse for the environment than conventionally produced chicken and pork

There are signs that the fake meat industry may be failing before it ever gets off the ground; shares of Beyond Meat lost $6 billion since March 2020 due to weak sales growth.

So the answer is to give them real meat but synthesize it from cancer cells.

Even babies of the future are also being targeted by Gates and his GMO foods.

Gates appears to be behind the push to stop breastfeeding and encourage the uptake of BIOMILQ, a cell-cultured “human milk” made in a lab, along with other varieties of fake food.

With parents getting desperate in the search for infant formula, it’s eye-opening that campaigns haven’t been started to encourage new mothers to breastfeed — the best food for infants and one that also happens to be free and readily available in most cases.

In June 2020, Bill Gates announced the startup company, BIOMILQ, which is using biotechnology to create lab-made human milk for babies. Using mammary epithelial cells placed in flasks with cell culture media, the cells grow and are placed in a bioreactor that the company says “recreates conditions similar to in the breast.”

This synthetic lab-made breast milk replacement raised $3.5 million in funding from Gates’ investment firm Breakthrough Energy Ventures. Gates has also contributed at least $319 million to the media, including The Guardian, allowing him to control and dictate what they print. The day after the Gates Foundation paid The Guardian its annual funding in May 2022, it released a hit piece on breastfeeding titled, “Turns out breastfeeding really does hurt — why does no one tell you?”

I still fail to realize how it affects the environment but hey, people can be duped into eating anything.

Corporate consolidation is rampant in the U.S. baby formula market, of which 90% is controlled by four companies. Abbot is among them, responsible for 43% of baby formula production in the U.S. Yet, according to a whistleblower filing from October 2021, equipment at the company’s Sturgis facility was “failing and in need of repair.”

Pitting and pinholes reportedly existed in a number of pipes, allowing bacterial contamination. Leadership was aware of the failing equipment for up to seven years before the February 2022 outbreak, according to the whistleblower’s report.

Abbott detected bacteria eight times as its net profits soared by 94% between 2019 and 2021. And just as its tainted formula allegedly began sickening a number of babies, with two deaths reported, the company increased dividends to shareholders by over 25% while announcing a stock buyback program worth $5bn.

Abbott chose to prioritize shareholders by issuing billions of dollars in stock buybacks instead of making productive investments.

Seems like it was a plan to get BIOMILQ into homes so that desperate parents would have to feed it to their infants.

The push for synthetic food and baby formula is being made on the platform that it will somehow save the environment from the ravages of factory farming, which has devastated the environment with its concentrated animal feeding operations and monocultures. But this, too, is misleading.

In February 2021, the Good Food Institute (GFI), a nonprofit group behind the alternative protein industry, released a techno-economic analysis of cultivated meat, which was prepared by consulting firm CE Delft.16 In it, they developed a model to reduce the current costs of cultured meat production down to a point that would make it economically feasible in full-scale plants by 2030, a model they said is “feasible.”

Farmer and historian John Lewis-Stempel also point out that the world’s farmers already produce enough food for the global population: “Any discussion of global food policy needs to begin with one plain fact: there is … no actual food shortage. Already, the planet’s farmers produce enough food to cater to the projected 10 billion humans in 2050. The problem is waste and distribution.”

Yet, the push for the creation of fake protein sources continues.

In attempting to create cultured meat on the scale that would be necessary to feed the world, logistical problems are numerous and, possibly, insurmountable. There are waste products — catabolites — to deal with, as even cultured cells excrete waste that is toxic.

And, the oxygen and nutrients available must be adequately distributed to all the cells — something that’s difficult in a large reactor. Stirring the cells faster or adding more oxygen may help, but this can cause fatal stress to the cells.17

The environmental “benefits” are also on shaky ground when you factor in soy products as well as the use of conventional energy sources. When this is factored in, GFI’s life-cycle analysis found that cultured meat may be worse for the environment than conventionally produced chicken and pork.

Real, nutrient-rich food is gradually disappearing, while the dominant industrial agricultural model is causing an increase in chronic diseases and would contribute to what the pundits are calling Climate Change.

The notion that high-tech, “farm-free” lab food is a viable solution to the food crisis is simply a continuation of the same mechanistic mindset which has brought us to where we are today — the idea that we are separate from and outside of nature.

Industrial food systems have reduced food to a commodity, to “stuff” that can then be constituted in the lab. In the process, both the planet’s health and our health will be utterly destroyed.

The fact remains that when private companies control the food supply, they will also ultimately control countries and entire populations.

Biotech will eventually push farmers and ranchers out of the equation and will threaten food security and human health. In other words, the work being done in the name of sustainability and saving the planet will give greater control to private corporations while weakening the population.

It is tactic of keeping people unhealthy and divided undefined again creating a peasant class that eats insects and eats whatever junk food , junk science creates.

All it takes is for scientists and doctors to say undefinedtry It undefined and people will comply undefined from drugs to vaccines and now synthetic food.

Over the past three years, we have been urged and coerced by our peers and employers to get an experimental vaccine- could we be facing the same enforcement for insect proteins, GMO milk and cancer celled beef and chicken?

Within the next couple of years, it will be “You are required

to take these drugs and eat these synthetic foods by law and if you don’t, you will go to prison for endangering the planet.”

Having been consistently brainwashed for all these years, most people will unquestioningly comply. Those who don’t will be informed by neighbors, coworkers, and even their own family members, for the safety of the planet.

So I have to piece all of this nonsense together we can’t get cancer from eating meat grown from animals’ cancer cells because animal cancer can’t cross over to humans, but we got Covid from someone eating an animal from a “wet market” because viruses can cross over from animals to humans.

Except that now we are being told it didn’t happen like that. Actually,

it’s true that the genetically mutated, man-made virus escaped from the Wuhan lab and that’s how we all got infected—but it’s concluded with “low confidence”.

Why can’t they ever say anything definitive? Why is it only the “likely explanation“ or an official endorsement that we have to approach with high skepticism? What good are experts if they are never sure of anything?

Who is going to eat what Bill Gates endorses? Well, I am sure a lot of people.

People donundefinedt understand that he is an evil Malthusian liar and is responsible for much of the haphazard science that is endorsed blindly by those who donundefinedt realize that a lot of money can go into controlling and weaponizing your health and what you eat.

It can also weaponize information.

What is most unfortunate is that you might be the most skeptical person in the world. You might not believe a single thing senile Joe Biden and his inept administration says, or the lies the media feeds you, but you will still take that vaccine, that drug, that fake meat because you will be told it’s for the greater good. And many people will have no problem giving these things to their children.

Schools will indoctrinate your kids into eating insects and synthetic foods because it will allegedly benefit the planet undefined and that is more important than being healthy and knowledgeable.

Are people realizing just how gullible and infantilized they have become?

How comforting to know the powers that be are looking ahead to protect us.

This is a one-size-fits-all response.

If this is too much for you to even think about, then go back to sleep and feel the comfort of thinking that everything is under control and that means everything, including you.

Bon Appetit.

SHOW GUEST: ATOM BERGSTROM

Atom Bergstrom has been professionally involved in holistic health and body language for decades, and is a graduate of the Texas Institute of Reflex Sciences and a long-time student of both Adano Ley and Sufi Master Adnan Sarhan. These days, Atomundefineds major topics of interest are Mind Hacking For the Millions, Solar Nutrition, Primary Water, and undefinedRed Pillundefined Reality Checking. Atomundefineds website is solartiming.com.