When Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum said that they saw a great opportunity with COVID-19 to implement their new ideas for the Great Reset, he was not kidding. The Panel for a Global Public Health Convention has called for a new “Pandemic Treaty” to promote “solidarity, transparency, accountability, and equity.” The proposals for the Pandemic Treaty would simply legitimize the process of Globalist-backed coups and reward the perpetrators with “international aid.” Additionally, it could allow the World Health Organization to declare a state of global emergency, in order to prevent a potential pandemic, not in response to one. This is the very definition of technocratic globalism. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks about FLEECE TREATY – LEARNING TO LOVE YOUR SERVITUDE.
From Sunday School to Social Studies, we have been warned about how a Republic can fall from grace — how it can go from Democracy to despotism. We have been warned that the time is short and that the devil is at the gate — we have been given the warning that an imperial cult or beast system will be established. Those who are faithful will rebel against it but the majority will adapt and allow for a cashless, obedient and chipped society.
We have all speculated time after time how it will all go down.
However, the plot has been revealed and people all over the world will accept and love big brother — they will also grow to love their servitude all because of their ignorance and how the majority of people have been groomed to fear the invisible enemy.
When Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum said that they saw a great opportunity with COVID-19 to implement their new ideas for the Great Reset, he was not kidding.
I want to make it clear that they are not kidding — they are quite clever and are now creating a new way to seize the keys of world power.
The media has distracted us enough with their partisan war propaganda to keep us form learning about how the beast system of the Antichrist has already been reviewed and is ready to be implemented.
Even though our attention has been shifted away from Covid because of war coverage — there are some very chilling things that are happening that may or may not be of interest to you — I believe they should be and this is why I have decided to reveal this information to you.
There have been reports that a wave of omicron BA.2 is sweeping through Europe and Asia, driving up cases, hospitalizations and even deaths. The origins of COVID-19 still remain unknown and while rich countries are already rolling out fourth doses of vaccines, one-third of the world remains completely unvaccinated and lifesaving treatments are only available in a handful of countries.
While the heightened conflict in Ukraine, spiking food prices and inflation have packed the nightly news, the pandemic endures and despite the years of pain, countries are no better prepared to face the next health crisis.
I recently reported that a possible gain of function is underway with tests of Avain Flu that can easily pass from bird to human — and that there have been culls of millions of chickens and turkeys that is forcing the price of poultry and eggs to go up.
No one can know if this is the next pandemic scare to move over the planet — and so the unelected world leaders at Davos and elsewhere have the solution.
The Panel for a Global Public Health Convention has called for a new “Pandemic Treaty.”
The Global Health convention stated that the goal of this treaty is to promote solidarity, transparency accountability and equity.
They say that these principles are crucial to stopping the nationalism, finger-pointing and inequitable responses that have led to millions of preventable deaths, and trillions of dollars lost to the economy and to the inexcusable delay in the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Furthermore, the panel says that:
“The treaty must move from global rhetoric to an incentivized system where compliance and accountability are locked in. The inability to control outbreaks and manage an efficient and effective pandemic response largely stems from the lack of compliance with existing International Health Regulations — a set of rules designed after SARS to enable countries to more quickly respond to new epidemics — and the failure to follow the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommendations. We know what remains to be done. We must now urgently set ourselves to doing it.
In conclusion the panel recommends that “more authority needs to be given to the WHO to set the standards in preparedness and response while, as the panel suggests, an independent monitoring body could help ensure the accountability of countries in terms of their compliance with these standards.
For such a program to work, and for it to rebuild the trust lost within the multilateral system and among and within countries since the pandemic began, there needs to be coherent and transparent governance through an overarching body able to oversee the spectrum of global pandemic preparedness, alert and response efforts.”
The group will meet again in mid June to finalize their scheme to take over =and create a world government and a medical surveillance state.
The goal is making the treaty “strong enough” and ensuring national governments can be “held accountable”.
The GPHC report goes on to say that the current International Health Regulations are “too weak”, and calls for the creation of a new “independent” international body to “assess government preparedness” and “publicly rebuke or praise countries, depending on their compliance with a set of agreed requirements”.
For this treaty to have teeth, the organization that governs it needs to have the power – either political or legal – to enforce compliance.
Dame Barbara Stocking one of the treaty’s author states that In its current form, the World Health Organization does not possess such powers. To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically.
It recommends the involvement of “non-state actors” such as the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, World Trade Organization and International Labor Organization in the negotiations, and suggests the treaty offer financial incentives for the early reporting of “health emergencies”
In case of a declared health emergency, resources need to flow to countries in which the emergency is occurring, triggering response elements such as financing and technical support. These are especially relevant for LMICs, and could be used to encourage and enhance the timely sharing of information by states, reassuring them that they will not be subject to arbitrary trade and travel sanctions for reporting, but instead be provided with the necessary financial and technical resources they require to effectively respond to the outbreak.
It doesn’t stop there, however. They also raise the question of countries being punished for “non-compliance”: The treaty should possess An adaptable incentive regime, including sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits.
In other words, using sanctions (an act of war) denying benefits could also include freezing bank accounts and devaluing money.
If you report “disease outbreaks” in a “timely manner”, you will get “financial resources” to deal with them.
If you don’t report disease outbreaks, or don’t follow the WHO’s directions, you will lose out on international aid and face trade embargoes and sanctions.
In combination, these proposed rules would literally incentivize reporting possible “disease outbreaks”. Far from preventing “future pandemics”, they would actively encourage them.
National governments who refuse to play ball being punished, and those who play along get paid off — governments who participate in this world order ploy will benefit and those that do not will be treated like Russia is being treated now because of their blood campaign in Ukraine.
Globalists backed coups and rewarded the perpetrators with “international aid”. The proposals for the Pandemic Treaty would simply legitimize this process, moving it from covert back channels to overt official ones.
This is outrageous — because many seasonal flu viruses could be classified as pandemic influenza and this would have to report their findings to the world body or face consequences.
Even if a virus has the potential to be a full blown pandemic — it should be reported to the world authorities.
The proposed treaty could allow the WHO to declare a state of global emergency to prevent a potential pandemic, not in response to one. A kind of pandemic pre-crime.
If you combine this with the proposed “financial aid” for developing nations reporting “potential health emergencies”, you can see what they’re building – essentially bribing third world governments to give the WHO a pretext for declaring a state of emergency.
We already know the other key points likely to be included in a pandemic treaty. They will almost certainly try to introduce international vaccine passports, and pour funding into big Pharma’s pockets to produce “vaccines” ever faster and with even less safety testing.
But all of that could pale in comparison to the legal powers potentially being handed to the director-general of the WHO (or whatever new “independent” body they may decide to create) to punish, rebuke or reward national governments.
A “Pandemic Treaty” that overrides or overrules national or local governments would hand supranational powers to an unelected bureaucrat or “expert”, who could exercise them entirely at his own discretion and on completely subjective criteria.
This is the very definition of technocratic globalism.
This is going to be the genotype phenotype nightmare that many will see as the global network of the Antichrist.
Indeed, for years now, the FBI and Justice Department have conspired to acquire near-limitless power and control over biometric information collected on law-abiding individuals, millions of whom have never been accused of a crime.
Genetic databases have acquired the DNA necessary to target certain individuals and eventually freeze bank accounts and even round people up if they do not follow the new world order.
The information is being amassed through a variety of routine procedures, with the police leading the way as prime collectors of biometrics for something as non-threatening as a simple moving violation. The nation’s courts are also doing their part to “build” the database, requiring biometric information as a precursor to more lenient sentences. And of course Corporate America (including Google, Facebook, Amazon, etc.) has made it so easy to use one’s biometrics to access everything from bank accounts to cell phones.
We’ve made it so easy for the government to target, identify and track us.
Now, we can add to the mix your potential of being a health threat with government agencies and corporations working in tandem to determine who is a potential danger and spin a sticky spider-web of threat assessments, behavioral sensing warnings, flagged “words,” and “suspicious” activity reports using automated eyes and ears, social media, behavior sensing software, and citizen spies, and you having the makings for a perfect dystopian nightmare.
I guess the question is how can we allow this to happen — well, I can give you an example of how problem reaction solution leads to people loving their servitude — if the government can keep you safe from the Covid boogeyman, many people would sell their souls.
For a pandemic that seems never-ending, the federal government’s 15-month travel mask mandate came to a surprisingly abrupt end after federal judge declared the mandate unlawful. Major airlines swiftly dropped the mandate they had grown to loathe, along with Amtrak, Uber and Lyft.
The Biden administration, which had recently renewed the mandate until May 3, seemed to be caught off guard by the judge’s decision, scrambling in the hours that followed to respond to questions.
There were Tik Tok videos that spread around the internet of people cheering when they were told they did not have to don the mask ever again.
They cheered — and believe it or not this again has divided the country in a very twisted way and for me I am more frightened of people that still wish to appeal the ruling saying that they are terrified as to what this means for the future health of the nation.
The ruling deepened divisions about how to approach the pandemic, and about what role government rules should play.
The Justice Department said in a statement it would appeal the recent ruling if the CDC deemed it necessary. The CDC was noncommittal. When the Biden administration was asked if people should continue to wear their masks the official statement was “It is up to them.”
The CDC however continues to recommend that people wear masks in all indoor public transportation settings.
” We will continue to assess the need for a mask requirement in those settings, based on several factors, including the U.S. COVID-19 community levels, risk of circulating and novel variants, and trends in cases and disease severity,” the agency said in a statement.
Many public health officials reacted with alarm, warning that new infections, while low, are edging back up.
Discordant messages from Washington added to the uncertainty. The administration’s Covid-19 response coordinator, Dr. Ashish K. Jha, said on Twitter he was disappointed in the judge’s ruling and would continue wearing a mask on flights.
In most facets of American life, masks became optional weeks or months ago. but this does not come with many people who are still being critical of those who have removed their masks claiming that COVID is still with us and so it is insensitive to not wear a mask.
In interviews, older Americans, people with compromised immune systems, parents with young children and low-income workers who rely on public transportation worried that they would now be at even greater risk with every bus ride or plane trip.
60 percent of adults supported keeping a mandate in place, according to a Harris Poll conducted this month. But amid the shifting rules and mixed data, some travelers said they did not really know what to think.
With the considerable amount of people still wanting the protocols in place even though the pandemic is ebbing says a great deal about what has happened to Americans and how infantilized many have become.
There has always been a danger of dying from a virus or a pathogen — and Covid-19 is not the worst thing to get because we know that it only kills the elderly and people with compromised immune systems/
Others should be fine — and most people have either had it . or have been vaccinated.
Even then the vaccinated still got it .. so that should tell you that no matter what you do you nay someday get a case of Covid.
But appears that one thing that cannot be shaken at this time is paranoia– and how the fear mongering has done its job — and how well the task of enslaving people has been accomplished.
To the point where people have learned to love their servitude and enslavement.
Aldous Huxley foresaw a Central State that persuaded its people to “love their servitude” via propaganda, drugs, entertainment and information-overload. In his view, the energy required to force compliance exceeded the “cost” of persuasion, and thus the Powers That Be would opt for the power of suggestion.
He outlined this in a letter to George Orwell: “My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World. Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.”
As prescient as he was, Huxley could not have foreseen the power of electronic media hypnosis/addiction as a conditioning mechanism for passivity and self-absorption. We are only beginning to understand the immense addictive/conditioning powers of 24/7 social and “news” media.
Emboldened by the citizenry’s inattention and willingness to tolerate its abuses, the government has weaponized one national crisis after another in order to expands its powers.
The war on terror, the war on drugs, the war on illegal immigration, asset forfeiture schemes, road safety schemes, school safety schemes, eminent domain, domestic terror, gun control, speech control : all of these programs started out as responses to pressing concerns and have since become weapons of compliance and control in the police state’s hands.
They are great problems that trigger reactions and the government who invented the problem already has its solution and we have seen that each solution erodes at human rights and dignity and people are so politically warped that they would do anything if it is supported by the ideology of their political affiliation.
It doesn’t even matter what the nature of the crisis might be—civil unrest, the national emergencies, “unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters”—as long as it allows the government to justify all manner of government tyranny in the so-called name of national security.
There have been many occasions on my show where i have talked about the beast system. the mythological system of the future that is supposed to be led by the Antichrist according to biblical prophecy.
When I speak of this government of the beast. I always get an email or I get messaged from someone about how are we to recognize the system when it is here.
I always say that this is a good question — or I come up with the answer that it is here already or that it has been gradually implemented since the rise of Communism. That has always been the struggle or our national fight — the fight against a Marxist take over.
You can say that it has been programmed into me because I am a child of the Cold War, however, now we see that it is not only Marxist philosophies we need to be weary of but technocratic tyranny that puts us into that Brave new World that Huxley talked about and that fascist nightmare that Orwell talked about.
This has been programmed into a lot of the older generations — so much so that it is in our psychological DNA,
The idea of a Communist world is no longer a threat to the younger generations; in fact, I would guess that many of the younger generations do not see it as a threat to our way of life — I would say that it would be welcomed with open arms.
Somehow, we have failed to teach the young how important our republic is and how democracy can dovetail into despotism quickly and easily because of ignorance and how we blindly follow authority.
To be sure, Karl Marx saw Communism as an end – the ultimate end that would make the sufferings of mankind throughout history worthwhile. The objective is to make people suffer, destroy that which they can rely on and replace it with something else.
This is why the slogan, Build Back Better is so hideous because it tells you that we have to break the legacy system in order to build it back. That includes destroying our free republic and as we can see with the simple task of removing masks there are those that are still complaining because they have fallen in love with their servitude– and they would relinquish their freedoms for safety –and demand that others do the same or else face severe punishment.
The system of the beast — the government of the antichrist looms over us like a dark cloud and we need to prepare for what is coming.
The building blocks are already in place for such an eventuality: the surveillance networks, fusion centers and government contractors that already share information in real time; the government’s massive biometric databases that can identify individuals based on genetic and biological markers; the militarized police, working in conjunction with federal agencies, ready and able to coordinate with the federal government when it’s time to round up the targeted individuals; the courts that will sanction the government’s methods, no matter how unlawful, as long as it’s done in the name of national security; and the detention facilities, whether private prisons or FEMA internment camps, that have been built and are waiting to be filled.
Now all of this may sound far-fetched to you now, but we’ve already arrived at the dystopian futures prophesied by George Orwell’s 1984, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, and Philip K. Dick’s Minority Report.
It won’t take much more to push us over the edge into Neill Blomkamp’s Elysium, in which the majority of humanity is relegated to an overpopulated, diseased, warring planet where the government employs technologies such as drones, tasers and biometric scanners to track, target and control the populace.
Mind you, while these technologies are already in use today and being hailed for their potentially life-saving, cost-saving, time-saving benefits it won’t be long before the drawbacks to having a government equipped with technology that makes it all-seeing, all-knowing, and all-powerful——helped along by the citizenry—far outdistance the benefits.
On a daily basis, Americans are relinquishing (in many cases, voluntarily) the most intimate details of who we are—their biological makeup, our genetic blueprints, and our biometrics (facial characteristics and structure, fingerprints, iris scans, etc.)—in order to navigate an increasingly technologically-enabled world.
Consider all the ways you continue to be tracked, hunted, hounded, and stalked by the government and its dubious agents:
By tapping into your phone lines and cell phone communications, the government knows what you say. By uploading all of your emails, opening your mail, and reading your Facebook posts and text messages, the government knows what you write. By monitoring your movements with the use of license plate readers, surveillance cameras and other tracking devices, the government knows where you go. By churning through all of the detritus of your life—what you read, where you go, what you say—the government can predict what you will do.
By mapping the synapses in your brain, scientists—and in turn, the government—will soon know what you remember. By mapping your biometrics—your “face-print”—and storing the information in a massive, shared government database available to bureaucratic agencies, police and the military, the government’s goal is to use facial recognition software to identify you (and every other person in the country) and track your movements, wherever you go. And by accessing your DNA, the government will soon know everything else about you that they don’t already know: your family chart, your ancestry, what you look like, your health history, your inclination to follow orders or chart your own course, it can be daunting.
But we were warned from the Apostle John to Orwell — the great 666 would be an inevitable part of our lives.
The ramifications of a government—any government—having this much unregulated, unaccountable power to target, track, round up and detain its citizens is beyond chilling. Imagine what a totalitarian regime such as Nazi Germany could have done with this kind of unadulterated power.
Imagine what the next police state to follow in Germany’s footsteps will do with this kind of power. Society is rapidly moving in that direction.
Remember, even the most well-intentioned government law or program can be—and has been—perverted, corrupted and used to advance illegitimate purposes once profit and power are added to the equation.
In the right or wrong hands, benevolent plans can easily be put to malevolent purposes.
Genotype surveillance, digital stalking and the data mining of the American people add up to a society in which there’s little room for indiscretions, imperfections, or acts of independence.
Marxist strategies of suffering in order to bring order are evident now.
The establishment of communism would put an end to human history. it would be lead by the secular Messiah that would guarantee peace by removing those who wish to undermine safety and security.
Today this new age of peace and harmony has been spoken of in terms like Build Back Better — or as Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum puts it, the Great Reset.
It has also been called the new normal –something that sounds a bit more passive than a totalitarian New Order.
This matrix is being constructed by the global elites and there are many that are participating in it and supporting it not knowing what they are supporting — not knowing that taking part in it disrespects those who have fought long and hard to guarantee freedom and liberty in a nation that used to be seen as a beacon and an example of how these rights and freedoms are upheld.
The new Kingdom Come is now here, its foundation has been made with the fear and tyranny brought forward from fear and the subjugation of authority.
Gradually, all millennialists have caused grave social and political trouble by “immanentizing the eschaton” — God has been nudged and the world is now going to see this new order rise up — and it will be done with very little resistance.