MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
It never fails, whenever I do shows about biblical passages that point to blood moons and the sun going dark, earthquakes birds and snakes and airplanes – Lenny Bruce may not be afraid – but some people are, and they always take the opportunity to email me and tell me that I am fear mongering.
They tell me I spread fear porn for the masses.
Sometimes it is fear that motivates people to prepare but as I have said end times thoughts and feelings are etched deeply into our DNA and so if something troubles you and you feel scared, I tell people to hug their cat—I have three and they are there to help you deal with the craziness that is happening in our apocalypse.
Maybe it is time to do something to avoid the apocalypse we are creating. We have always been told that there are existential threats that are unavoidable, the planet we live on is unpredictable.
People are unpredictable and we are now seeing history repeating itself as leadership no matter what political cloth they are cut from are becoming megalomaniacal sadists.
Before COVID-19, the most hyped “existential” threat was Climate Change.
Political personalities like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders would preach doom unless we drastically changed our lifestyle. Putting our end of the world date at 12 years — more or less around 2030.
Immediately, some Global Warming alarmists vowed to not have any more children, they demanded a greener world and the World economic Forum pushed the 2030 agenda.
The agenda was gaining momentum as true believers vowed to stop flying, drive electric cars and preach the green deal.
But no one else cared, no one else saw the existential threat — no one wanted to play in the end game strategy.
People weren’t scared enough to change.
Then along came the spikey virus — one graphic floating behind the commentators shows a little balloon festooned with spikes. The mainstream media had an obligation to spread “coronadoom.”
They didn’t have to be so melodramatic – but death and horror sells. Adversarial journalism sells and the the little spikey virus became a political cudgel along with masks and social distancing and self-imposed house arrests.
People have meekly complied with drastic curtailments of their liberties and economic constraints guaranteeing the destruction of businesses not protected by government.
Rules supposed to last 14 days were extended repeatedly, with constantly moving goalposts.
Now, we are seeing a light at the end of the tunnel as the virus seems to winding down and people have the choice to be vaccinated — that is until they didn’t.
In some places it is not a choice and for some people wanting to get back to work they have a choice of wither getting a vaccine or getting fired.
It appears that whoever is pushing this doom agenda does not want to see things get back to normal.. they are not ready to relinquish their power.
So it has been said after the first 14 days were extended into a year and now beyond a year as paranoia is now growing over the unforgivable sin of vaccine hesitancy.
Whistleblowers from inside Facebook say that the social network is censoring skeptics of the COVID-19 vaccine by demoting user comments by way of an algorithm that calculates a ‘vaccine hesitancy score,’ Project Veritas claims.
James O’Keefe, the head of Project Veritas, claimed on Fox News that two anonymous Facebook employees leaked documents showing that the company was testing a ‘beta’ version of the algorithm to target anti-vaxxers.
The documents purport to show that the beta version was being tested on 1.5 per cent of some 3.8 billion users of Facebook and its subsidiary, Instagram, around the world.
In its ‘executive summary’ section, it states that the goal is to ‘drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy in comments.’
The document states that ‘reducing the visibility of these comments represents another significant opportunity for us to remove barriers to vaccination that users on the platform may potentially encounter.’
Facebook’s aim is to ‘decrease in other engagement of VH comments including crate, likes, reports and replies.’
‘The narrative is get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you, everyone should get it,’ the documents state.
If you don’t, you will be singled out as an enemy of society – or more accurately and enemy of the state.
Multibillionaire oligarchs and “philanthropists” — most prominently the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation — want to vaccinate everybody in the world.
Or, maybe just everybody else.
At least 25 states, plus Washington, DC, have now fully vaccinated at least half of their adult residents, data published Sunday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows.
Those states are Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.
Four of those states — Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Vermont — have fully vaccinated more than half of their total resident population, not just adults, the CDC said Monday.
The impact they say is showing.
Some Americans are resisting getting vaccinated, and in response the White House has poured resources into educating the American public about the safety and efficacy of the three COVID-19 vaccines available in the US.
That is not all.
They are also talking tough and creating a climate of exclusion and segregation.
This government has polarized the nation on a scale never before attempted, legitimizing a particular brand of prejudice and enmity not seen since the dark times of the third Reich,
COVID passports are now becoming the new threat — in some states they are your ticket to freedom — they are your key to getting back to normal– non compliance will push you out of public places or they will push you into segregated locales at sporting events, concerts, bars, and eating establishments.
Yes, without a COVID passport in some states — you will be forced to sit in the back of the bus.
They now have the means to weed out and punish dissidence while rewarding blind faith in authority. No matter how injurious their compliance is to society at large, the silent majority have lost their moral compass.
It is obvious that there are evil people that do not care about how creating a scapegoat led to some of the worst atrocities in our history.
Who cares about anyone not from a protected social group, right?
President Biden who was touted as the Uniter, the President of Love and equality has now made it clear — he has become the COVID-19 dictator by stating:
The rule is now simple: get vaccinated or wear a mask until you do. The choice is yours.
This not a choice–this does not promote agency. Robbing someone of one’s agency is cruel and is the pure definition of evil.
What is most disconcerting is that the same people pushing the vaccine agenda are the same that will immediately scream doom and gloom about climate after the Covid storm passes.
The climate alarmists don’t want things to ever go back to normal. COVID-19 was their foot in the door.
Climate Change activist Greta Thunberg announced that the Greta Thunberg Foundation will donate 100,000 euros to “vaccine equity.”
When those dedicated to reducing humanity’s “footprint” on the planet suddenly switch to universal vaccination, should some caution lights flash–should those red flags of warning go up?
It became more than obvious that there is something evil going on when they came for the children and made them pawns in the Covid war.
Does COVID-19 kill children? Almost never. Do children infect Grandma? Almost never. Does the vaccine keep you from transmitting disease?
Possibly, but keep wearing that mask.
Pregnant women were excluded from early trials but are getting the jab anyway.
Some, who were hoping to give their baby antibodies, miscarried or had a stillbirth.
Agencies will investigate, and surely come up with statistics on “extreme rarity,” but let’s see independent forensic pathology on the placentas and dead babies.
Now young people receiving the vaccine are complaining of myocarditis.
Vaccine safety experts are studying a small number of cases of heart muscle inflammation that have been reported in multiple countries among young people who had recently received their second dose of one of the coronavirus vaccines.
Investigators of course can’t be sure if the swelling of the heart tissue can be linked to the vaccines.
The first reports of myocarditis following vaccinations emerged in Israel. Some 62 people, mostly young adults, were diagnosed with the heart inflammation after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to the Times of Israel, which cited a leaked report from the Israeli Health Ministry. More than 5 million people in Israel had been vaccinated by that point.
At least 18 teens and young adults in Connecticut have shown symptoms of heart problems after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.
A CDC safety committee released an advisory last week to alert doctors of “myocarditis” among younger vaccine recipients after a “relatively few” cases of the unusual heart symptom surfaced.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Monday during a press briefing that President Joe Biden has been informed of the reported cases and that the administration will continue to advise young people to get vaccinated.
That is a response?
Young people are developing swollen heart tissue and the President says that young people still need to get the vaccine– how is this any different than President Trump allegedly telling people to drink bleach?
This is unbelievable.
The official statement is that Health officials say the reported cases appear to be mild and typically begin within four days after the second dose of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
But officially the CDC has yet to determine if the vaccines were the cause of the reported heart condition.
The excuses that we here can all be memorized they seem so rehearsed.
A new report, published just yesterday, has provided yet more evidence that the CDC is manipulating data to conceal the number of “breakthrough infections”.
A “breakthrough infection” (or “breakthrough case”) is defined as a person who tests positive for Sars-Cov-2 infection, despite already being fully vaccinated. And this new report finds that the CDC’s official record of breakthrough cases is quote
“A likely a substantial undercount.”
Going on to explain:
The national surveillance system relies on passive and voluntary reporting, and data might not be complete or representative. Many persons with vaccine breakthrough infections, especially those who are asymptomatic or who experience mild illness, might not seek testing.
Which is partially accurate, but also a pretty major lie by omission.
It is probably true that vaccinated people with no symptoms are unlikely to seek testing, but it is also true that, on March 17th, the CDC updated their advice on testing policy to specifically exclude such people from testing protocols.
So, while it’s certainly true that “breakthrough cases” are likely a substantial undercount, it is dishonest to pretend that this is just an accident of the system. Rather, the system is specifically designed to hide such cases.
Of course, this report only goes up to the end of April, the “undercount” will only have gotten worse since then, because the CDC changed their rules AGAIN to make it even harder to keep an accurate count of breakthrough cases.
Statistical studies have shown up to 86% of COVID “cases” never experience symptoms. To exclude such cases from your vaccine effectiveness studies is to poison your data in order to prop up a pre-determined conclusion. It is, at the very best, extremely poor science.
Of course, the truth is far more cynical even than that.
In the past the vaccines have been paused because of bad side effects that have resulted in death and granted not all of the pawn in this game carry the scars of iatrogenesis.
However, the idea that vaccines should be compulsory is something that destroys agency and will certainly create another class of individuals that could be used for discrimination.
Legal teams are now gathering to support those who do not wish to be vaccinated.
The legal salvos show that a groundswell against compulsory immunization is being coordinated by law firms across the country.
They offer a window into a wide-ranging and well-resourced effort to contest vaccine requirements in workplaces and other settings critical to the country’s reopening — a dispute with sweeping implications for public health, state authority and individual rights.
“The message is, ‘Maybe you should reconsider because you don’t want to end up in court,’ ” said Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, a professor at the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law. “I think that works.”
Most employers shy away from mandating coronavirus vaccines and for good reason. Vaccine mandates may harm a business if an employee suffers debilitating side effects that either puts them in the hospital. handicaps or kills them.
New OSHA guidance holds employers liable for adverse reactions if they require employees be vaccinated for COVID as a condition of employment, which could negatively impact the employer’s safety rating.
These new guidelines from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is making employers think twice about their COVID vaccine requirements.
On April 20, companies were put on notice they’ll be responsible for any adverse reaction should they require their employees be vaccinated with a COVID vaccine.
In the Frequently Asked Questions section of OSHA’s website having to do with COVID safety compliance, a question was asked whether an adverse reaction to a COVID vaccine had to be recorded if an employer mandated vaccination as a condition for employment.
“If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.”
In general, an adverse reaction to the COVID vaccine is recordable if the reaction is: (1) work-related, (2) a new case and (3) meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7 (e.g., days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid).
According to OSHA, recording requirements of serious work-related injuries and illness may leave employers with worker’s compensation claims and impact their safety record.
Conversely, OSHA states it will exercise enforcement discretion and will not require adverse reactions be recorded when an employer only “recommends” that employees receive the vaccine, while noting that for this discretion to apply, the vaccine must be truly voluntary.
In determining whether a vaccine is “voluntary,” the website states, “an employee’s choice to accept or reject the vaccine cannot affect [his or her] performance rating or professional advancement,” and that an “employee who chooses not to receive the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from this choice.”
If employees are not free to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine without fearing negative recourse, then the vaccine is required and employers should refer to the section on COVID vaccines as a condition to employment.
In response to the news that COVID vaccine adverse reactions suffered by workers are reportable incidents, or incidents that count against a company’s safety record, several large contractors said they have changed or will change their vaccination policy to only recommend — not require — a vaccine.
All businesses and institutions will be very reluctant to mandate vaccinations if OSHA says adverse reactions count as reportable against a company’s “experience modification rate.
An Experience Modification Rate, or EMR, is a safety rating insurers use in calculating workers’ compensation. Part of the calculation includes reportable incidents — a higher number of reportable incidents damages the company’s safety ratings and could hike up the price of insurance
According to the National Law Review, employers may want to make it clear in communications to employees whether COVID vaccines are required or voluntary.
Employers may also consider circumstances in which OSHA will investigate an employer’s record keeping practices. If an employer’s vaccination program is voluntary, an employer may not have any entries resulting from adverse reactions. Under those circumstances, OSHA will have to ask the employer about the vaccination program and whether any employee suffered an adverse reaction.
Employees may be more likely to make a complaint to OSHA when they have been denied time off for an illness that they consider to be work-related, which means post-vaccination paid time off may be helpful.
Although OSHA is facing scrutiny for its guidance, it is consistent with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), which requires any product with this designation to be voluntary. Currently, Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson are only approved for emergency use.
Many Americans do not know their rights and when they do, they should contest any mandates regardless of the vaccines safety.
Under an Emergency Use Authorization, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandated.
To anyone interested in the truth, the task of keeping the government honest is going to be an uphill climb but it is vitally important that those who wish to silence and or manipulate the system need to be exposed as evil people.
They are the real enemies of the state.