MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
It has been said many times that Donald Trump’s presidency was a stress test for democracy. That he was a wrecking ball that broke the mold of how government was run.
It was also a stress test for those who tried to talk about events that happened when he was President because independent media would be attacked by a mainstream media that would condemn anyone who reported anything other than the framed narrative they produced.
They would label them conspiracy theorists. For a time, mainstream news would called anyone who questioned the motives behind climate change as anti-science. They called anyone who questioned the last election results as conspiracy theorists claiming that election fraud was all in the mind of President Trump and his followers and that they believed in “The Big Lie,” an old Nazi term that was coined by Joseph Goebbels.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
The OSS psychological profile of Hitler described his use of the big lie:
His primary rules were never allowing the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
Goebbels did describe the big lie in different language in an article he wrote in 1941, “Churchill’s Lie Factory,” but he was accusing the British of the ploy:
The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.
Pay attention to the last sentence — where the liars keep up their lies even at the risk of looking ridiculous.
Have you ever felt as though the lying, gas lighting and propaganda about COVID-19 is looking ridiculous? Alleged Conspiracy theorists have pointed this out constantly and have been accused of lying, or they have been banned from Facebook or fact checked for even the most trivial things.
But something happened that immediately vindicated the so-called conspiracy theorists.
Having spent months mercilessly removing any claims that the COVID-19 may not have evolved naturally, Facebook said it will no longer do so. The move comes as Wuhan lab-leak theory is gaining mainstream attention.
“In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of [Covid-19] and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that [Covid-19] is man-made from our apps,” a Facebook spokesperson told Politico on Wednesday evening, in an emailed statement.
“We’re continuing to work with health experts to keep pace with the evolving nature of the pandemic and regularly update our policies as new facts and trends emerge,” Facebook added.
Back in February, “following consultations with leading health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO),” Facebook said it was banning a number of “debunked” and “false” claims – including saying that the virus was “man-made or manufactured.”
So far, it appears Facebook (which also owns Instagram) is the only one to reverse course. Twitter and Google’s YouTube did not respond to Politico’s request for comment about their own policies.
The change of heart comes after the White House announced a 90-day deadline for the US intelligence community to produce a “definitive” assessment of where the novel coronavirus originated, with President Joe Biden claiming the spies were torn between “human contact with an infected animal” and “a laboratory accident.”
Until just a few weeks ago, however, merely suggesting the possibility of a “laboratory accident” – not even claiming that the virus was man-made – was grounds for getting censored on social media.
US corporate and social media alike have spent the past year insisting that the mere suggestion that the virus may have escaped from the Wuhan Labs – even by accident, as Trump and his Secretary of State Mike Pompeo claimed was a conspiracy theory with zero merit. A State Department inquiry into the origin of the virus, which began under Trump, was ordered shut by Biden in March.
Looks like the “plandemic” conspiracy is getting some legs and the evidence is getting support.
Again conspiracy theorists may have been right but it is far from being a victory as I am sure the framing of this new found revelation will still leave a doubt in the minds of those who are spoon fed from the mainstream press.
Three years ago, I held a standing room only seminar at Contact in the Desert speaking about plans of a Gain of Function exercise called CLADE X. This was followed a year later with a workshop about an Gain of Function Disease X table top exercise where an unknown alien pathogen would be released from a lab and would bring governments to their knees.
The month of October just months before China reported the first cases of COVID-19 the Bill and Melinda gates foundation and Johns Hopkins University held another meeting called Event-201.
These exercises were funded and carried out by the same financial backers of the institute that was granted a U.S. patent for “an attenuated coronavirus” in November 2018. The patent was filed in July 2015. by the Pirbright Institute. Some of the major backers of the Pirbright Institute include the World Health Organization, the European Commission, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
We knew even before the event that this was in the cards for the future.
But it was dismissed as conspiracy theory, even with all of the tidbits of information leading to the conclusion that perhaps COVID-19 was a biological attack — it was shut down and fact-checked and we were put in notice that we would be shut down if we did not stop reporting this.
Well, now there is a bit of vindication in the news but we don’t have time to gloat because there is the next event that people should prepare for and I have been warning people throughout the pandemic that a major cyber attack in looming.
After the SolarWinds cyber-attacks and the recent Colonial Pipeline False flag where the government and the oil company paid off the cyber terrorists with nearly 5 Million in Ransom, there was very little comment on the matter from President Biden.
President Biden gave a “no comment” when asked if he was aware of the payment. It was a curious response since the media apparently knew. The company certainly knew, and, most importantly, the cyber terrorists who called themselves DarkSide knew. Yet, the White House wanted to portray itself as a pure observer to a private decision on how to handle “hackers.”
The reason is obvious: Colonial just paid a ransom to terrorists. Moreover, gas pipelines are not just “a private company” but a highly regulated industry that closely follows the government’s directions.
I am sure that President Biden was told not to talk about the incident as the FBI was monitoring Cyber attacks by DarkSide since just before the election.
We reported that there was a rash of computer hacks that were shutting down hospitals and other vital infrastructure. Even though there were speculations about hacks that interfered with the election — those were immediately dismissed even though there was precedent to suspect that something was not quite right about these computer systems that seemed to be a little too vulnerable up until the final votes were counted and Joe Biden was elected President.
There were many memes that were crested and posted on the internet saying that if you can hack a pipeline, you can hack an election.
But of course the mainstream media will tell you that any and all doubts about the election based on computer malfunction is now called the “Big Lie.” The media does not want you to believe that cyber hackers are plotting their next big move.
Biden won’t comment because he is afraid to tell the American people that we are vulnerable.
However, there was one man who commented in the cyber attacks:
The Grand Leader of The Technofascist Great Reset, Klaus Schwab, issued his pronouncement: our digital infrastructure and even the power grid that enables it is at great risk of global disruption from cyberattack.
And you know what? He’s right. It’s just that the most likely cyberterrorists are the criminals in government and in organizations connected to the World Economic Forum.
They are telling us of their plans; in fact, they are going to do their own little gain of function exercise called, Cyber Polygon.
Cyber Polygon 2021 is going to stage supply chain attack simulation. The question is, will Cyber Polygon 2021 be as prophetic as Event 201 in simulating a pandemic response?
The World Economic Forum will stage another cyber-attack exercise as it continues to prep for a potential cyber pandemic that founder Klaus Schwab says will be worse than the current global crisis.
The SolarWinds hack served as a wake-up call to the supply chain attack vulnerabilities still present in public and private organizations, and it served as a warning that the next breach could be exponentially worse in spreading through any device connected to the internet.
The World Economic Forum has announced that the 2021 Gain of Function exercise will be taking place on July 9.
Schwab stated that “a cyber-attack with COVID-like characteristics would spread faster and farther than any biological virus.”
This year, Cyber Polygon 2021 will simulate a fictional cyber-attack with participants from dozens of countries responding to “a targeted supply chain attack on a corporate ecosystem in real time.”
According to the Cyber Polygon website and itinerary it says:
As the digital world encroaches on our physical and biological worlds, an effective cyber attack could compromise anything connected to the internet, including:
Medical devices that keep people alive
The Internet of Things ecosystem of connected devices that run smart homes (i.e. cameras, microphones, sensors, etc.)
The Internet of Bodies ecosystem of digitally-connected humans
Global financial systems
Water treatment facilities
Government IT systems
Military and defense infrastructure
Currently, “The only way to stop the exponential propagation of a COVID-like cyber-attack threat,” according to the WEF, “is to fully disconnect the millions of vulnerable devices from one another and from the internet.”
But, “A single day without the internet would cost our economies more than $50 billion, and that’s before considering economic and societal damages should these devices be linked to essential services, such as transports or healthcare.”
Klaus Schwab goes on to say that “The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyber attack.
Last year, the World Economic Forum tackled the issue of what they call a Cyber Pandemic that would be in the cards for the next three years.
The central theme of the Cyber Polygon 2020 exercise was “digital pandemic: how to prevent a crisis and to reinforce cybersecurity on all levels.”
The goal of last year’s Cyber Polygon event was to:
-Develop the teams’ competencies in repelling cyber attacks
-Engage the management of global organizations and corporations in the cybersecurity dialogue.
-Raise public awareness in cybersecurity
The exercise featured two parallel tracks: a live stream for a mass audience and technical training for cybersecurity specialists, and 120 of the largest Russian and international organizations from 29 countries joined the technical training to practice response to a targeted attack, aimed at hacking company data and undermining its reputation.
While the technical training side of the event was dedicated to responding to a single attack, the conversations from the live stream portions provided the most insights for dealing with the potential fallout of the attack — the digital pandemic.
The plans that these world leaders were making are certainly worthy of exposure.
Speaking at Cyber Polygon 2020, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair stated with confidence that governments are “absolutely, inevitably” moving in the direction of digital identity adoption.
Digital identity is a major component of the WEF’s great reset agenda as it relates to transformative technologies powering the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
A digital identity keeps a record of everything you do online, including what you share on social media, the websites you visit, and your smartphone’s geolocation, and it can house all of the credentials you would normally find in a physical wallet, such as your driver’s license, insurance card, and credit cards.
In his talk, Blair didn’t make the case for why having a digital identity was actually necessary to prevent a cyber pandemic, but rather that digital identities would be an inevitable part of the digital ecosystem, and so governments should work with technology companies to protect and regulate their use.
“Digital ID for me is a very big part of the future,” said Blair.
“Inevitably, governments are going to move in this direction — absolutely, inevitably,” he added.
If a hacker were to gain control over someone’s digital identity, they could essentially shut them out of participating in civil society by erasing them completely or exploiting their information in such a way that blocks victims from proving they have money in the bank, a passport that allows them to travel, a valid driver’s license, proof of immunity, and any other credentials that are necessary for citizens to access goods and services.
And while digital identities show promise towards improving the livelihoods of millions when governed ethically, they are also used by authoritarian governments to profile and police citizen behavior under a social credit system.
Whether the data be secured or not, individual liberty will depend on how the technology is used and the level of trust given to those who govern it.
According to a WEF report from 2018, “digital identity determines what products, services and information we can access – or, conversely, what is closed off to us” — the level of which to be determined by our online behavior.
This sounds more and more like the beast system foretold in the Book of Revelation.
You can expect that Cyber polygon 2021 will most certainly outline a number of concerns that would encroach the progress of a new world order.
There plan is to consolidate resources and collaborate with corporations and states.
A plan to deal with any and all information that they consider to be disinformation and misinformation that has yet to be unveiled.
A push towards digital identity that will need to be secured and protected.
They are proposing a Digital Big Brother but how are they going to implement this?
Of course, there will have to be a crisis that will conveniently scare people into conforming to these draconian moves.
Cyber Polygon will present new challenges in which participants will respond to a different threat — a targeted supply chain attack on a corporate ecosystem in real-time.
If the results and recommendations from previous pandemic simulations are any indication of what may lie ahead for society, then the findings and policies coming out of Cyber Polygon 2021 may have real-world societal impact in the very near future.
They will include:
Governments implementing lockdowns worldwide
The collapse of many industries
Growing mistrust between governments and citizens
A greater adoption of biometric surveillance technologies
Social media censorship in the name of combating misinformation
The desire to flood communication channels with “authoritative” sources
Rioting in the streets
And a whole lot more!
When the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus a pandemic on March 11, 2020, governments all over the world went into lockdown, which had devastating effects on the economy with businesses closing, civil unrest skyrocketing, unemployment surging, housing foreclosures on the horizon, and the largest transfer of wealth ever recorded in human history.
However, many of these scenarios were already anticipated and taken into account in previous simulations, and yet they all still came to pass.
Will the conversations coming out of Cyber Polygon 2021 prove to be as prophetic for the digital world as Event 201 and Clade X were for the physical one?
I am sure the mainstream media will have an answer that will be simple and completely wrong.