We are increasingly immersed in electro-smog as our cities are turning into kill grids, adversely affecting life with heavy doses of radiation. Decision-makers who fail to protect their citizens should be held personally responsible for this severe breach of duty and put on notice for betraying the public trust. They are ignoring the overwhelming evidence on the hazards of electrifying everything for allegedly saving Earth but in reality, having full spectrum dominance over the planet. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks with Deborah Tavares about ELECTRIC FUNERAL – THE DANGERS OF FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE.
One of the things I have spoken of briefly on my show is the real problem of manufacturers of electric cars removing AM radios in newer models. Automakers say EVs’ electric motors interfere with AM frequencies, creating annoying buzzing noises and faded signals.
What is happening is that the electric waves that are generated within the EV interfere with AM signals. The electric waves that you cannot see create interference but what is most alarming is that not only are they willing to remove Am radio as a safety measure because of frequency interference, but they have no need to warn the consumer how these electric waves for cars and everything else electrified is detrimental to human safety and wellbeing.
As far back as 2008, there have been studies done on non-ionizing radiation and how electrical fields can aggravate tumor and fungal growth.
With 3 billion cell phone users worldwide and more than 260 million in the United States alone—among them, 46% of U.S. children aged 8–12, according to Nielsen Mobile figures human exposure to low-energy radiation in the 800- to 2,000-megahertz range is at an all-time high.
The most recent attempt to systematically review the epidemiologic evidence for increased risk of brain tumors related to cell phone use indicates that repercussions from this global experiment are coming to light. In a meta-analysis published in the May 2008 issue of the International Journal of Oncology, Swedish researchers found significant associations between long-term cell phone use and brain tumor risk. phone use is linked to gliomas [malignant brain tumors] and acoustic neuromas [benign tumors of the brain’s auditory nerve] and are showing up after only ten years of use in some young people.
Here in the United States these figures have been ignored and have been rejected as disinformation. As stated by the National Cancer Institute, “there is currently no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation increases cancer risk in humans.
While American studies say that they have no idea about what long-term exposure to non-ionized radiation can do– they will say that kind of radiation can chemically damage your DNA and increase your risk of cancer. They claim that the non-ionizing type from phones doesn’t have enough energy to directly damage the DNA in your cells. Still, parts of your body near your phone’s antenna can absorb its radiation.
New studies from Sweden, China, Australia and the U.K. shed light on human exposure to electromagnetic radiation from wireless technologies, but the authors of one study alleged industry tried to censor their research, and in another case, critics accused researchers of having conflicts of interest with the telecom industry.
In the first example, an international peer-reviewed journal — Annals of Case Reports — on January 10, 2023, published a Swedish case report showing 5G radiation causes symptoms indicative of “microwave syndrome.”
According to researchers with the Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA) in Brisbane, Australia, and the Centre for Environment and Population Health at the School of Medicine and Dentistry at Griffith University in Brisbane, there is an “extensive evidence base revealing that significant stress to human biological systems is being imposed by exposure to everyday wireless communication devices and supporting infrastructure.”
“This evidence is compelling enough to warrant an update in medical education and practice,” they added.
In their report, the researchers reviewed the methods and findings of 1,106 experimental and epidemiological studies collated within the ORSAA database that were focused on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields and radiation.
The results showed that two-thirds of the experimental and epidemiological papers found significant biological effects, the researchers said, adding:
“The breadth of biological and health categories where effects have been found was subsequently explored, revealing hundreds of papers showing fundamental biological processes that are impacted, such as protein damage, biochemical changes and oxidative stress.”
The researchers also suggested a set of “best practice guidelines” for treating patients affected by electromagnetic exposures and for using technology safely in healthcare settings.
Exposure to very high RF intensities can result in the heating of biological tissue and an increase in body temperature. Tissue damage in humans could occur during exposure to high RF levels because of the body’s inability to cope with or dissipate the excessive heat that could be generated.
With all the studies about electromagnetic radiation doing harm to the body in the long term — can someone explain why we are being told that in order to have a greener world — we must make everything run on electricity, regardless of the non-ionizing radiation it can produce?
We all know they are looking for Net Zero emissions — but is it worthy of having all of us be condemned to an electric funeral — all for the sake of full spectrum dominance?
It is obvious that Net Zero means fewer humans on the planet but you cannot shake the green cultists out of their trance.
Politicians and government officials at every level seem to be entranced these days by a specific goal when it comes to pushing forward on clean energy: shifting to an all-electric energy system. The idea may seem to make sense because fossil fuels and their carbon emissions have become a pariah in the face of climate change, but does it, really?
When looking at a national energy system comprised of an electric grid (powered by a mix of fossil fuels like coal and gas); gas distribution systems for heating, cooking and other energy needs; and direct burn of fuels ranging from propane to wood chips to petroleum, the all-electric thought process seems to go like this:
Let’s remove all direct fuel burning from the energy ecosystem, given they release greenhouse gas emissions, and Let’s make sure the electric grid is powered only by carbon-free sources to remove the rest of the fossil fuels from our energy use.
Leaders under pressure about climate and clean energy issues, who also don’t have direct energy experience or understanding themselves, see no flaw with this logic. And by adopting that way of thinking, they can make big sweeping promises like a carbon-neutral grid by 2040 or a 100% clean energy system by 2050. These goals seem so simple, and for them, it starts with going all-electric in buildings, all-electric in transportation, all-electric in industry … all-electric, all the time!
But is this goal a good idea? Are we collectively rushing to this conclusion? And have we looked past how great of a slogan 100% electrification sounds like to consider potential unintended consequences?
We understand little about our nature and the laws that underpin life, but arrogant and self-centered, believe we are planetary custodians; we cannot even live peacefully together in community, let alone be responsible for the planet and the unbelievable abundance of life that exists within its orbit.
Humility, the quality most lacking within the race – totally absent within politicians/leaders and big business, is essential if we are to begin to live gracefully as one interconnected family, forming part of an earthly family, which in truth we are.
The human body is full of electrical and electromagnetic events and therefore can be controlled by electromagnetic radiation, which can have benign as well as harmful effects on its states. It may control even such events as cell division or activity of neurons, as well as synchronized activity of masses of neurons in the brain and in this way, produce “artificial“ activity of the human nervous system.
High tech will lead to neurotech — which means that everything electrified will have an effect on all of us neurologically.
Speaking about the electro exposure from external tools in 2021 the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO wrote:
“External tools that may interfere with our decisions can call into question, or even challenge, an individual’s free will, and consequently an individual’s responsibilities. In this way, neurotechnology could affect freedom of thought, decision-making and action. Taken together, these could have a profound impact on justice systems and social organizations,”
The activity of human brains and bodies can be manipulated by electromagnetic waves since electric currents are key factors of neural and muscle activity.
In 2020, the American Academy of Sciences wrote in the report on attacks on American diplomats in Cuba and China, well known as the Havana syndrome, that the most likely cause of their problems was directed pulsed electromagnetic radio frequency waves.
It is well known that these attacks are accompanied by artificially produced acoustic hallucinations. Those events suggest that pulsed microwaves are already being used as a weapon today. As a matter of fact, if human speech is converted into ultrasound and then into pulsed microwaves or extra-long electromagnetic waves, a human being will perceive them as his own thoughts, since it will not hear it.
When the phrases, transmitted into the brain, will be converted into ultrasound, people will not realize them, because they will not hear them, but the phrases will reach their brain anyway and in this way will become the targeted persons “thoughts“.
If everything is electric in the future we may have to wear clothing that blocks these types of seriously damaging waves — or we may even be coaxed into taking a pill or even a vaccine to ward off the effects of electromagnetic waves in the body.
There are thousands of people worldwide, who complain about being exposed to electro-smog, which tests the capability of neurotechnological devices to deprive people of their freedom of thought, and freedom of health at a distance and cause them pain by electromagnetic waves.
The current legislation protecting human rights must be updated to cover the new threats provided by advances in neurotechnology. There needs to be a concerted challenge to the idea of electrifying everything around us — as it most certainly needs to be reviewed and tested to make sure that we are not facing a long and tortuous death by non-ionizing radiation.
The sixth generation of cell phone telephony plans to connect human brains to the internet and the first sales of this technology are already underway,
Human trials are set to start soon for Elon Musk’s brain-chip implants after his company gained FDA approval last Thursday.
Neuralink, the brain-chip company founded by Musk, has announced that it has received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to proceed with its first human tests.
Neuralink, is under federal investigation for potential animal-welfare violations amid internal staff complaints that its animal testing is being rushed, causing needless suffering and deaths,
In all, the company has killed about 1,500 animals, including more than 280 sheep, pigs and monkeys, following experiments since 2018, according to records reviewed by Reuters and sources with direct knowledge of the company’s animal-testing operations. The sources characterized that figure as a rough estimate because the company does not keep precise records on the number of animals tested and killed. Neuralink has also conducted research using rats and mice.
Granted with many experiments you would have deaths– but many of the deaths were negligent deaths due to accidents while implanting the chips.
Reuters identified four experiments involving 86 pigs and two monkeys that were marred in recent years by human errors. The mistakes weakened the experiments’ research value and required the tests to be repeated, leading to more animals being killed.
On another occasion, staff accidentally implanted Neuralink’s device on the wrong vertebra of two different pigs during two separate surgeries, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter and documents reviewed by Reuters. The incident frustrated several employees who said the mistakes “on two separate occasions” could have easily been avoided by carefully counting the vertebrae before inserting the device.
The company veterinarian Sam Baker advised his colleagues to immediately kill one of the pigs to end her suffering.
But one does not necessarily need a chip to be manipulated by Radio Frequency exposure.
For manipulation of human brains, activities could be used as well as electrical grids, if they are made to produce extra long electromagnetic waves in the frequencies of activity of neurons in human brains (1 to 100 Hz). Such waves, due to their length (from 300 thousand to 3 thousand kilometers), are capable of covering large areas of „brain space“.
Such waves can even be produced by manipulating the ionosphere to produce extra-long electromagnetic waves in the brain frequencies.
In 1999 the European parliament was investigating the abilities of the U.S. radar system HAARP. The operation of this facility was transferred from the United States Air Force to the University of Alaska in Fairbanks on Aug. 11, 2015.
The Russian radar system SURA has similar abilities. China is actually building its own, more advanced, system after experimenting with the Russian system SURA.
You need to ask yourself now why major governments, corporations, think tanks and the Davos World economic forum are all promoting a Zero Carbon global agenda to eliminate the use of oil, gas, and coal.
They know that the turn to solar and wind-based electricity is impossible. It is impossible because of the demand for raw materials from copper to cobalt to lithium to concrete and steel exceeds global supply. It is impossible because of the staggering trillions in cost of battery backup for a “reliable” 100% renewable electric grid.
It is also impossible without causing the collapse of our present standard of living and a breakdown of our food supply that will mean mass death from starvation and disease.
Even paling the absolute corruption surrounding the vaccine coercion by Big Pharma and major government officials globally is the mindless push especially by Europe and US governments to advance a Green Agenda whose costs vs benefits have rarely been openly examined.
There is a good reason for this. It has to do with a sinister agenda to destroy industrial economies and reduce the global population by billions of human beings.
More than ten years ago people like Al Gore, told us that we have reached a tipping point into irreversible sea level rise, “boiling oceans,” iceberg meltdowns, global catastrophe and worse.
Later others like Greta Tunberg, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Bernie Sanders have been pushing this all-or-nothing agenda — because they too have pushed a doomsday scenario that can only be quieted by using clean energy like Nuclear and electricity.
In one of his first acts in office, in 2021 Joe Biden issued a proclamation that the US economy shall become Zero Net Carbon by 2050 in transportation, electricity and manufacturing.
We are being pushed for the first time in modern history from a more energy-efficient economy into a dramatically less energy-efficient one. No one in Washington talks about the true required natural resources for this fraud, let alone the cost.
They also ignore the many people’s lives that will be snuffed out while politicians will be able to use plausible deniability with regard to electromagnetic effects on the brain and body.
One of the most remarkable aspects of the fraudulent global hype for so-called “clean, renewable” Green Energy—solar and wind—is how non-renewable and environmentally dirty it actually is. Almost no attention goes to the staggering environmental costs that go into making mammoth wind towers or solar panels or EV lithium-ion batteries. That grave omission is deliberate.
Solar panels and giant wind power arrays require huge amounts of raw materials. A standard engineering evaluation between “renewable” solar and wind versus present nuclear, gas or coal electricity production would begin by comparing bulk materials used such as concrete, steel, aluminum, and copper consumed per production of
TeraWatt hour (TWh) of electricity. Wind consumes 5,931 tons of bulk material per TWh, and solar 2,441 tons, both many times higher than coal, gas or nuclear. Building a single wind turbine requires 900 tons of steel, 2,500 tons of concrete and 45 tons of non-recyclable plastic. Solar power farms require even more cement, steel and glass—not to mention other metals. Keep in mind the energy efficiency of wind and solar is dramatically lower than of conventional electricity.
A recent study by the Institute for Sustainable Futures details the impossible demands of mining for not only EV vehicles but, in addition, for 100% renewable electric power, mainly solar and wind farms. The report notes that the raw materials to make solar PV panels or windmills are concentrated in a small number of countries—China, Australia, DR Congo, Chile, Bolivia, and Argentina.
They point out that, “China is the largest producer of metals used in solar PV and wind technologies, with the largest share of production for aluminum, cadmium, gallium, indium, rare earth, selenium and tellurium. In addition, China also has a large influence over the market for cobalt and lithium for batteries.” It continues, “While Australia is the largest producer of lithium …the largest lithium mine, Greenbushes in Western Australia, is majority owned by a Chinese company.” Not so good when the West is escalating a confrontation with China.
The main problem with wind and solar farms is the fact that they are not reliable, something essential for our modern economy, even in developing countries. Unpredictable power blackouts that affect grid stability were almost nonexistent in the US or Europe until the introduction of major solar and wind. If we insist as do the Zero Carbon ideologues, that no backup oil, gas or coal plants be allowed to stabilize the grid in low solar times such as night or cloudy days or winter, or times when the wind does not blow at the optimal velocity, the only serious answer being discussed is to build EV battery storage, lots of it.
Clearly, the powers behind this mad Zero Carbon agenda know such a reality. They don’t care, as their goal has nothing to do with the environment. It is about the eugenics and culling of the human herd.
Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Program, in his opening speech to the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, declared, “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” At the Rio Summit, Strong oversaw the drafting of the UN “Sustainable Environment” goals, the Agenda 21 for Sustainable Development that forms the basis of Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset, as well as the creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Today’s technocrats will tell you that they uphold international human rights norms and that their particular supply chains are clean. They will assure you that conditions are not as bad as they seem and that they are bringing commerce, wages, education, and development to the poorest people but they are enslaving people to mine cobalt and copper. What happens if we run out of that finite resource — everything from the batteries in almost every smartphone, tablet, laptop, and electric vehicle made today cannot recharge without cobalt.
Coal mines will be replaced with Cobalt mines — and will no doubt destroy landscapes throughout the Congo which is rich in copper and cobalt.
They will eat up the resources that could put a lot of people at risk for starvation and slave labor.
The public may have no alternative but to make a criminal complaint against decision-makers and seek prosecution and claims for compensation. Decision makers who fail to protect public health should be held personally responsible for this serious breach of duty and put on notice for betraying the public trust by ignoring the overwhelming evidence on the hazards of electrifying everything to allegedly save the planet and have full spectrum dominance.
Deborah Tavares is a 3rd generation land developer of residential construction and has been self‐employed in a family operated business for over 30 years. It was during this time that the restrictions of property rights became evident to her under the creeping constraints of the United Nation’s AGENDA 21, through land use limitations, restrictions, regulations, fees and increased liability exposures.