We are in the midst of what can be called a conspiracy domino effect of social engineering that will almost guarantee the cloaked enslavement of the American Republic. The American people are being treated like enemy combatants. No matter how well-meaning the politicians make these encroachments on our rights appear, benevolent plans can easily be put to malevolent purposes in the right or wrong hands. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks about REDVOLUTION’S BEGUN – FROM THE BARREL OF A GUN.
I have often thought about how identity politics are a cover for people to exercise their right to literally try and find interesting ways to destroy people they don’t agree with politically.
We are in a moment of finger-pointing and ‘other’ making because we do not want to admit that the more we say we have differences the more we act the same.
There is no essential difference between your identity politics-brainwashed liberal and your Swastika-tattooed white supremacist. Both are looking at the world through the lens of race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or some other type of “identity.”
We have been programmed in some way to do this – it is again a way to divide people into castes and cliques.
We are all emotionally invested in some political cause and most people on both sides are looking through this “identity” lens whichever one it happens to be because either they have been conditioned to do so most likely from the time they were children or they have made a conscious choice to do so after recognizing, and affirming or rejecting, whatever conditioning they received as children.
The world, or “reality,” or whatever you want to call it, is more than happy to transform itself into any imaginable shape and form, based on the lens you are looking at it through. It’s like a trickster in that regard. Look at “reality” through a racist lens, and everything will make sense according to that logic. Look at it through a social justice lens, or a Judeo-Christian lens, or a Muslim lens, or a scientific or a Scientologist lens, or a historical materialist or capitalist lens (it really makes no difference at all) … and abracadabra!
A new world order s born!
We build back better and the government makes its promise to protect you from all of the vampires of the world – cleverly hiding that they are secretly the vampires you should be afraid of and that you should defend yourself against,
True listeners of Ground Zero do not waste time trying to figure out if there are agendas to exposing treachery – the truth is far more valuable than remaining victimized by powerful individuals that abuse our freedoms and use trauma-based manipulation to create a problem that they already have the answer for something that has been developed in a think-tank that does not answer to the government which is for the people and by the people.
We are in the midst of what can be called a conspiracy domino effect of social engineering that will almost guarantee the cloaked enslavement of the American Republic. Once you are sure that there is one conspiracy to undermine our well-being we begin to see other conspiracies that tie into several neighboring conspiracy theories.
Pretty soon, you begin to believe in many conspiracy theories because, quite frankly, the media has now been very good at not reporting what you really need to know and what they offer is their own bit of conspiracy spinning that is most certainly dividing the people and putting them in a position of overthink.
I think a lot of my approach to any conspiracy would be similar to what Robert Anton Wilson stated about such matters of treachery.
Wilson once said “just because you are paranoid doesn’t mean they are not out to get you” – If you think that the government is out to get you — it probably is and there are plenty of others that are willing to enforce tyranny because they feel that they are protecting a constitution that they obviously know nothing about.
This is why we are having the J6 show trial in America — President Biden has consolidated his power so that he and his constituents can declare war on populism which can be argued is a war on reality itself.
We all know that Donald Trump is no longer president but there are those in the aftermath of the election that wish to feed the fires of civil war.
Name your enemy but the bottom line is the real enemy is the people, that are getting in the way of the New World Order.
Ignore the brainwashing that associates the words “America” and “democracy” and the idea of “rule of law”. Reject all that programming we’ve all been subjected too since we first watched television that tells us this kind of thing just doesn’t happen here.
It does, and it is.
With all the talk of President Trump trying to interfere with the election process wouldn’t a show trial such as it is also be evidence of coup where a group of people make sure he’s barred from ever running for office again?
Isn’t that considered a coup? This is how they do things in communist China or the former Soviet Union.
Are we so clean and without the black spots of using creative loopholes to fix an election process?
Is this really even a pretense of democracy anymore? Do they have even the slightest veneer of the “will of the people” left?
At least 50 percent of the people are being vilified in this show trial. They are being humiliated and told that what they did was modern fascist behavior.
This is not democracy — it can be argued that this the death rattle of democracy.
It is a very well crafted conspiracy — not a theory , but blatant conspiracy that is being cheered on like reality television.
This is a political game of Simon says and they are always Simon.– you better get used to it because they are not going to stop with the pageantry they use to kill democracy on Prime time TV.
There will be more show trails, more censorship and worse still the disarming of the populace so that there will be no more attempts at storming the castle.
Yes — as fanatical as it sounds they are coming for your guns -and again they will find clever loopholes to do it — and soon the second amendment will wind up in the trash, just like the first amendment has.
Gun ownership, licensing and regulations are hot topics in Washington, on social networks, at the water cooler and around some dining room tables.
You can largely determine where a person will fall in the debate over gun control and the Second Amendment based on their view of government and the role it should play in our lives.
There are those who see the government as a Nanny State, empowered to look out for the best interests of the populace, even when that means overriding our rights as individuals and free will. These individuals tend to interpret the Second Amendment to mean that only members of law enforcement and the military are entitled to own a gun.
But isn’t that a lot like that Hollywood movie called, Schindler’s List?
There is nothing wrong with getting on with the spirit of the times as we keep hearing things like the big lie, coup de tat and insurrection.
Those words are thrown around like dirty brown shirts and seem to terrorists if they wear the red hats and use the American flag as a cudgel.
We learn that there is nothing more American than the new American dictatorships that are triggered at every moment and are well known for histrionics.
President Biden wrongly asserted that “the Second Amendment” from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own.
These are the same people that think that the second amendment was made to allow people to have guns for hunting only — and of course that is not the case.
There are others who see the government as inherently corrupt.
These individuals tend to view the Second Amendment as a means of self-defense, whether that involves defending themselves against threats to their freedoms or threats from individuals looking to harm them.
It is certainly not far-fetched to suggest that the elements within the government might be engaged in nefarious activities that run counter to the best interests of the American people; however, expressing this sentiment is certainly the precursor to thought crime that is actionable. It is just a matter of whether or not someone in a black suit wishes to pay you a visit when you say such things.
Oh, I can hear people say that saying something like that is simply alarmist.
If you have nothing to hide then why should you worry about the authorities with standard issue kicking in your door?
This attitude is pure and simple and attitude of acclimation. We are now engaged in a bit of Stockholm Syndrome with those who wish to take our freedoms away.
The big question that is never asked by the people or the media is how people can support the state when it is so obviously immoral and against the best interests of the vast majority of people.
One would expect, given all the terrible things that government has done, that people would be far more receptive to the idea of shrinking the size and scope of government, but suggestions of this nature are almost universally met with hate and vitriol.
Things like propaganda, forced and compulsory education and media manipulation can certainly explain part of it. However when you try to explain this to people it is like you are kicking their inner child – that inner child that still wants to believe that everything America was back then, is the same now.
There are also those who don’t see the government as good or evil — some of them probably do not own a gun but would like the choice for self defense or if the government decides to take away that right and thus demonstrating that they wish to lead by tyranny.
To those who are ambivalent to to gun debate the Second Amendment’s assurance of the people’s right to bear arms is no different from any other right enshrined in the Constitution: to be safeguarded, exercised prudently and maintained.
It is not something the defend with religious fervor or say from my cold dead hands — they are also aware that perhaps there needs to be some modifications to the current gun laws that hopefully don’t infringe upon constitutional rights.
But that is the problem today.
How to exercise this right is the question that becomes a heated debate that is if there is any debate left as there are groups becoming dismissive and spreading all sorts of disinformation about what guns do and what they should be used for.
Indeed, while it still technically remains legal to own a firearm in America, possessing one can now get you pulled over, searched, arrested, subjected to all manner of surveillance, treated as a suspect without ever having committed a crime, shot at, and killed.
The war at home is not recognized because of how it is being reported . Neighborhoods are becoming battlefields by design in order to frighten people into thinking that if we eliminate the guns we won’t be seeing war in the streets but again, you take away weapons that can be used to defend your family and your land — you have the military and the police holding the guns and those with the weapons control the food, the water, the commerce — you get the picture.
At a time when red flag gun laws, which authorize government officials to seize guns from individuals viewed as a danger to themselves or others are gaining traction as a legislative means by which to allow police to remove guns from people suspected of being threats, it wouldn’t take much for police to be given the green light to enter a home without a warrant in order to seize lawfully-possessed firearms based on concerns that the guns might pose a danger.
You wouldn’t even need to own a gun to be subjected to such a home invasion.
Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have adopted laws allowing the police to remove guns from people suspected of being threats. If Congress succeeds in passing the Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order, which would nationalize red flag laws, that number will grow.
Most people believe that the heads of state are certainly to be trusted and even politicians that sell you on socialism are not out to hurt them but to improve upon this life that we have here in America, forgetting that this life was all about securing the blessings of the liberty to ourselves and our posterity within the foundation of our Constitution.
Socialism to the young and progressives is like America in a chrysalis – once the changing takes place –we will be able to fly under a new flag, a new world, a new form of government.
How relieving is that?
All of the young and the progressives think that there is a world coming that is so utopian that we forget the dystopian models of surveillance and rights violations that are actually implemented in the process of this change.
Back in 2008, an Army War College report revealed that “widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security.” The 44-page report went on to warn that potential causes for such civil unrest could include another terrorist attack, “unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters.”
In 2009, reports by the Department of Homeland Security surfaced that labeled right-wing and left-wing activists and military veterans as extremists (a.k.a. terrorists) and called on the government to subject such targeted individuals to full-fledged pre-crime surveillance. Almost a decade later, after spending billions to fight terrorism, the DHS concluded that the greater threat is not from radical Islam but domestic right-wing extremism.
Due to the recent mass shootings, there is a major push for so-called “Red Flag” gun laws at both the state and federal levels. These laws are the latest tool for gun control advocates to confiscate guns from people based upon only tips and suspicion. No crime has to be committed to trigger an investigation or confiscation.
Red Flag laws violate multiple rights protected by our Constitution.
However, there are those that push the limits and while thoughtcrime is an Orwellian concept, there are those who you may or may not approve of being arrested and detained by their attitude and the words they use.
With these red flag gun laws, the stated intention is to disarm individuals who are potential threats… to “stop dangerous people before they act.”
While in theory it appears perfectly reasonable to want to disarm individuals who are clearly suicidal and/or pose an “immediate danger” to themselves or others, where the problem arises is when you put the power to determine who is a potential danger in the hands of government agencies, the courts and the police.
This again pushes the issue of thought crime or pre crime — assuming that someone even has a gun can get them shot or killed execution style.
If you are paying attention to the show trial — we hear that “anti-government,” “extremist” and “terrorist” can be used interchangeably. Same goes for Coup de tat, and insurrection and remember it only applies to one side of the ideology.
Social Justice protests where buildings can be burned down and people can be killed in the streets is approved — but using a crowd to check on democratic voting is considered a coup.
There were parts of the protest of January 6th that were peaceful, but now it will all be summed up as an armed insurrection encouraged by a tyrant — a traitor in our midst that led 50 percent of the American people against democracy .
Is this really what happened?
Is it worth fueling the fires of a civil war in America ?
It won’t stop with the show trials — it will continue as many Americans will be judged by their various ideologies, behaviors, affiliations and other characteristics that could flag someone as suspicious and result in their being labeled potential enemies of the state.
Call it an overreaction — but if you look into the histories of the Soviet Show trials we see that what is happening is paralleled and we all know that it lead to using those who wish to protest as examples of terrorists — and a New Order cannot take over with an armed citizenry.
if you believe in and exercise your rights under the Constitution namely, your right to speak freely, worship freely, associate with like-minded individuals who share your political views, criticize the government, own a weapon, demand a warrant before being questioned or searched, or any other activity viewed as potentially anti-government, racist, bigoted, anarchic or sovereign), you could be at the top of the government’s terrorism watch list.
As a New York Times editorial warns, you may be an anti-government extremist in the eyes of the police if you are afraid that the government is plotting to confiscate your firearms, if you believe the economy is about to collapse and the government will soon declare martial law, or if you display an unusual number of political and/or ideological bumper stickers on your car.
This is considered a Red Flag — calling attention to yourself could lead to your arrest or worse.
Red Flag Watches lead to thought crime arrests and confiscations. Pre-crime is not science fiction anymore.
The question is whether or not freedom is worthy of risk? Is freedom a death sentence? Is constitutional a right fallible and do we support draconian pre-crime laws?
The American people have been treated like enemy combatants. We are now used to being spied on, tracked, scanned, and subjected to all manner of intrusions, intimidated, invaded, raided, manhandled, censored, silenced, shot at, locked up, denied due process, and killed.
Now, you have to hide your guns, your words, your actions. You now even have to hide your thoughts or your anger because this can be seen as a pretext for a breakdown.
There is a place for alarmism when threats to civil liberties are concerned. Too much worry about our freedoms is better than too little.
No matter how well-meaning the politicians make these encroachments on our rights appear, in the right or wrong hands, benevolent plans can easily be put to malevolent purposes.