As we reflect on what happened 21 years ago, we may have forgotten why many of the stories that were generated by the media wound up being buried and later were said to be conspiracy theories. The 9/11 narrative, especially involving undefinedcontrolled demolitionundefined was changed and it worked because of magical propaganda as the thought of an “inside job” was outside people’s conceptual framework. The new conspiracy is how the major networks, apologists, and intelligence operators work overtime to control your perception with lies and statecraft. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks about 9-11 LEST WE FORGET TRUST NO ONE.
SHOW SAMPLE:
SHOW PODCAST:
https://aftermath.media/podcast/9-12-22-9-11-lest-we-forget-trust-no-one/
SHOW TRANSCRIPT:
Every time I see a new movie or watch a TV show, I see reality bent in such a way that it begins to shape attitudes - it pushes agendas even in what we may think is just a harmless fictional journey.
TV is now stopping and allowing for Climate Change themes undefined the inclusion of Disneyfied gay couples and demon cartoons that may or may not get laughs.
In his book, The Power of Myth, Joseph Campbell calls this undefinedthe commonality of themes in world myths, pointing to a constant requirement in the human psyche for a centering in terms of deep principles.undefined
When observing and pointing out the so-called Revelation of the Method, running themes and images have to be uncovered and there is a need to verify or otherwise interpret their meaning. To uncover themes and meanings, one has to make verifiable observations that can be pointed out and agreed upon by others.
I am contending that when we get caught up in the excitement of the moment we may overlook details that may reveal startling things.
Whether we like it or not we are all caught up in the ritualism of the moment and like any good magician you can be distracted and details when analyzed can be very simple.
It can be seen as a sort of lesson in Occam’s Razor.
Occamundefineds Razor, is the idea that, in trying to understand something, getting unnecessary information out of the way is the fastest way to the truth or to the best explanation.
Occam’s Razor is often used to debunk conspiracy theories or UFO sightings as the person states the simplest and dullest explanation is probably the best explanation for something that is unexplainable.
There is no challenging opinion or challenging thought from those who have rigid thinking and so there are a lot of things that they miss out on with their negative and uncomfortable way of somehow believing they are the ‘reality police’ and always needing to explain that those who believe in what they feel is nonsense are purely delusional and imbecilic.
Anymore we are beginning to see that mysteries and riddles are hidden in plain sight. Those with eyes wide open are beginning to see that the world is one big paranormal carnival and that standing there waiting to take your tickets is a fresh-faced devil that will tell you that you have entered a graveyard disguised as a circus with cute ballerinas and cartwheeling clowns.
Conspiracy theorists are often told that secrets cannot be kept because it is virtually impossible to keep lies from being revealed to people.
Yet there is an overwhelming amount of mistrust, paranoia, and suspicion in our time and one would hope that it will shift and that we could all live peaceful lives free from doubt.
A constant however is conflict.
It will not escape us because it seems to be a great motivator. Fear is a great business tool and it is attractive in the apocalypse.
If fear is pumped into every home and business on a daily basis then the battle over who owns your decision-making processes is evident.
When making decisions as to what information is real and what isnundefinedt, we have to determine the motivation behind the reason for releasing such information. Once you have mastered the ability to look beyond what is alleged undefinedrealityundefined you will understand the true identity of many things.
The world is due for reactionary attitudes that are worse than the ones we hear and see recently on the nightly news. We cannot continue to navigate the world using old-fashioned methods.
We live in times where the evil and manipulative elites are no longer hiding their deceit undefined or we can conclude that they were never that clever to begin with and so they commit their crimes in plain sight and then use the media to cover up their crimes and their sloppy mistakes with the official narrative.
Last Friday, the show that was planned was going to be a look back at the 911 attacks, but of course, the Queen passed away and the timing of her passing coincided with a show that we did days before about Charles becoming King. We chose to be topical and have a final word on the Monarchy.
Over the weekend though I had plenty of time to go over some of the old shows that I have done about the 911 attacks. I did not want to do another one of those shows that would sound like a repeat of others.
Most of my past shows have been groundbreaking because they have dropped a number of bombshells especially when we are told not to forget what happened on that day and I am finding that people have forgotten a lot.
The reason is that people have their own agendas about what had happened that day. People want to convince you that you need to speak about direct energy weapons bringing down the buildings or that the planes were holograms or that no plane hit the pentagon. And of course, you are not doing your job unless you talk about Building 7.
Well, I donundefinedt know how many times I have talked about these theories and it appears that all of them are fascinating undefined but many of the different versions of these stories cloud the investigation.
Tonight, I have some information that when I give it people are going to say undefinedIs that it?undefined or undefinedIt canundefinedt be that simple.undefined
Well, I donundefinedt know about that but I need to explain some things before I drop a simple bomb for you to think about.
Twenty-one years ago, the idea of large-scale false flags or government deceptions may have seemed absurd to most of us. But the unraveling of so many official narratives in the past; the lies over the JFK assassination, WMDs, Climate Change, COVID-19 and Ukraine.
The repeat evidence for wholesale manipulation, if not fabrication, of events to promote war, means it ought to be impossible for any thinking person to simply take the events of 9/11 on trust anymore.
How can any of us continue to question everything 9/11 has brought us, but not question 9/11 itself? What really happened on that day and how in the commotion we may have forgotten why many of the stories that were generated by the media wound up being buried and later were said to be conspiracy theories.
The new conspiracy is how the major networks, apologists, and intelligence operators work overtime to control your perception with lies and statecraft.
This type of statecraft had to be carried out during the 911 attacks in order to control the narrative of what is remembered and what is forgotten.
In August 2002, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology launched what would become a six-year investigation of the three building failures that occurred on September 11, 2001 :
The well-known collapses of the World Trade Center (WTC) Twin Towers that morning and the lesser-known collapse late that afternoon of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which was not struck by an airplane.
National Institute of Standards and Technology conducted its investigation based on the stated premise that the WTC Towers and WTC 7 were the only known cases of total structural collapse in high-rise buildings where fires played a significant role.
Keep in mind that neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise—nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-story office building.
Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.
This speculation alone angers those who want to believe that the World Trade Center was unique and that it goes against science and blah blah blah undefined but no one understands why anyone would actually think this would be the case.
Well for one, the media reported that this is how the towers and eventually Building 7 came down.
The controlled demolition narrative was actually reported by 11 TV news broadcasts.
These included the networks ABC, CBS, and NBC; cable news channels CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and CNBC; and local network affiliates WABC, WCBS, and WNBC.
Narrative framing, by contrast, tells us how reporters interpreted the event after having more time to process their perceptions and to synthesize additional information from other sources. Narrative reporting thus tells us about the collective narrative that was developing among reporters covering the event.
Even FDNY witnesses were speaking about explosions in the buildings, which were later explained away as something else.
We were then given the story of how airplane fuel melted the steel on the towers and that they fell in pancake descent.
The 9/11 narrative was changed and it worked because of magical propaganda as the thought of an “inside job” was outside people’s conceptual framework. No one would believe that two, 110-story buildings collapsed to the ground from kerosene fires in less than 12 seconds or that Building 7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds which hadn’t even been hit by a plane.
According to MIT:
Steel-framed high-rises have endured large fires without suffering total collapse for four main reasons:
Fires typically are not hot enough and do not last long enough in any single area to generate enough energy to heat the large structural members to the point where they fail (the temperature at which structural steel loses enough strength to fail is dependent on the factor of safety used in the design. In the case of WTC 7, for example, the factor of safety was generally 3 or higher. Here, 67% of the strength would need to be lost for failure to ensue, which would require the steel to be heated to about 660°C);
Most high-rises have fire suppression systems (water sprinklers), which further prevent a fire from releasing sufficient energy to heat the steel to a critical failure state;
Structural members are protected by fireproofing materials, which are designed to prevent them from reaching failure temperatures within specified time periods; and
Steel-framed high-rises are designed to be highly redundant structural systems. Thus, if a localized failure occurs, it does not result in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure.
Throughout history, three steel-framed high-rises are known to have suffered partial collapses due to fires; none of those led to a total collapse. Countless other steel-framed high-rises have experienced large, long-lasting fires without suffering either partial or total collapse.
In addition to resisting ever-present gravity loads and occasional fires, high-rises must be designed to resist loads generated during other extreme events — in particular, high winds and earthquakes. Designing for high-wind and seismic events mainly requires the ability of the structure to resist lateral loads, which generate both tensile and compressive stresses in the columns due to bending, the latter stresses than being combined with gravity-induced compressive stresses due to vertical loads.
It was not until steel became widely manufactured that the ability to resist large lateral loads was achieved and the construction of high-rises became possible. Steel is both very strong and ductile, which allows it to withstand the tensile stresses generated by lateral loads, unlike brittle materials, such as concrete, that are weak in tension. Although concrete is used in some high-rises today, steel reinforcement is needed in virtually all cases.
To allow for the resistance of lateral loads, high-rises are often designed such that the percentage of their columns’ load capacity used for gravity loads is relatively low. The exterior columns of the Twin Towers, for example, used only about 20% of their capacity to withstand gravity loads, leaving a large margin for the additional lateral loads that occur during high-wind and seismic events.
Because the only loads present on 9/11 after the impact of the airplanes were gravity and fire (there were no high winds that day), many engineers were surprised that the Twin Towers completely collapsed. The towers, in fact, had been designed specifically to withstand the impact of a jetliner, as the head structural engineer John Skilling, explained in an interview with the Seattle Times following the 1993 World Trade Center bombing:
Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed,” he said. “The building structure would still be there.”
Skilling went on to say he didn’t think a single 200-pound [90-kg] car bomb would topple or do major structural damage to either of the Twin Towers.
“However,” he added, “I’m not saying that properly applied explosives—shaped explosives—of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage […] I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.”
In other words, Skilling believed the only mechanism that could bring down the Twin Towers was controlled demolition.
I am still trying to hold back the revelation that was right in fron of our faces undefined a little detail that was overlooked about the possibility of controlled demolition of The Twin Towers and building 7.
It is uncanny but before the great reveal, we have to understand how the elites behind major disasters love to tell us before and even after how they did their magic act that leads to total control.
We need to pay attention to not only what is presented but what isn’t, with regard to events that create mass death and panic.
Conspiracy writer, Michael Hoffman, wrote the book, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare and in it he stated:
“There is a dark poetry to ritual murder, to twilight language, to the fantastic convergences known as coincidence. Most ‘conspiracy researchers’ miss this. The best investigator – of the occult or of almost anything else – has a child-like sense of curiosity and wonder about seemingly mundane things.”
The big reveal tonight is very mundane and many may know what I am about to reveal while others will ask undefinedHow did I miss this detail.?undefined
Well, now is a good time as any to say that if anyone wants to challenge you on theories of controlled demolition at the Towers and Building 7 undefined ask them who was contracted to do the clean-up at Ground Zero?
The name of the company was Controlled Demolition, Inc.
On September 22, 2001, eleven days after the 9/11 attacks, a preliminary cleanup plan for the World Trade Center site was delivered by Controlled Demolition, Inc.
Yes undefined unbelievable, isnundefinedt it? Has anyone ever brought this up?
Controlled Demolition, Inc. is a company that has demolished several notable buildings by implosion.
On May 24, 1995, the firm was responsible for the demolition of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building after the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995.
The company was contracted to demolish the remaining portion of the 12-story condominium of the Champlain towers in Miami. The demolition occurred on July 4, 2021, after only a day of preparation, including the placement of explosives; city officials had feared that the demolition could take weeks
As the still-standing structure was unstable, it was considered unsafe to enter and CDI had originally estimated that the demolition could not occur until the following day, since the work had to be done carefully and slowly to avoid a premature collapse.
This risk of collapse and its risk to rescuers warranted the controlled demolition, which was directed away from the original collapse footprint.
The same excuse for controlled demolition could be applied to the towers with Building 7.
It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Therefore, we witnessed an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001- a miracle that can only be explained as a controlled demolition, perhaps carried out by a government-contracted demolition company on-site called Controlled Demolition Inc.
It is so obvious, in plain sight, and is in need of explanation. Any company, any group could have been called in for clean up of Ground Zero but it just happens to be a controlled demolition company with a long list of government contracts where evidence and other important items can be cleaned up or even destroyed by controlled demolition.
The evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.
undefined
