MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
When Orwell wrote 1984 in 1949, he had a deep concern for what he saw was the deterioration of human values that occurs when a political party, right-wing or left-wing, seizes power and forms an intensely oppressive totalitarian government. What is most disconcerting is that in 21st century America we have a political ideology that is exemplified by our President and a phantom left-wing resistance that are both determined to enforce what is called the psychology of the state.
Developing a state psychology is dangerous in that totalitarian regimes use it as a way to force a civil religious agenda where party is valued over country and state psychology can be used as a method to eliminate those who think differently.
In Orwell’s vision of a terrorized society individuality is eliminated and the collective thought is encouraged in order to keep the people in line with political psychology that squashes dissent and eliminates cognitive liberty and the ability to think beyond the confines of the state psychology.
History was erased and inconvenient histories were eliminated or erased. All historical books were burned, historical statues were taken down, and individual records were destroyed.
Propaganda replaced factual truth. Personal privacy was eliminated.
Placards everywhere proclaimed ‘Big Brother is watching you’. The overall aim of the INSOC government was to reduce individuals to automatons.
Here we are in the 21st Century, and the issue regarding the gain or loss of individual freedom – when it comes to a particular party’s political agenda is constantly being raised.
What is most disconcerting is that we all have our own idea of freedom – we all can think, feel and love without interference, however, we are now facing a greater evil and that is the enforcement of what can be called the psychology of the state.
During the Leonid Brezhnev regime in the Soviet Union, there was a systematic abuse of psychology. They made political opposition or dissent a psychiatric disorder. It was called psychopathological mechanism of dissent. If you openly disagreed or expressed beliefs contrary to the official dogma, you where labeled as “philosophically intoxicated.”
I have urged my audience to learn more about psychopathological mechanisms because they are being employed little by little and soon enforcing state ideologies and state psychology will be mandatory.
The political dictatorship is no longer embodied in one man like President Trump – the push for a state psychology is now being pushed and used as a cudgel against the American people by the left-wing resistance.
The resistance believes that they are the champions of freedom but they are proposing a new form of government that appears to be similar to state socialism and they wish to the implement the state psychology that can be used against political enemies.
If you don’t believe me take a look at what they are doing to President Trump and Joe Biden.
Recently Joe Biden had come under fire for gaffes that he had made on the campaign trail. Women’s March co-chairwoman Linda Sarsour expressed concern for Biden’s mental health when in New Hampshire he mentioned how much he loved Vermont.
She said that the recent gaffed he made and his exaggeration of events to tell a story indicate that we should be concerned about his mental health.
So far the media has reported that he confused the locations of the El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, mass shootings, that told supporters that “poor kids” are just as smart as “white kids,” claimed he was still vice president during the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida, and mixed up Burlington, Vermont, and Burlington, Iowa.
Additionally, the media reported that the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. happened in the late 1970s when both men actually died in 1968. Biden allegedly has also referred to Margaret Thatcher, who died in 2013, as the current British prime minister on two occasions, and incorrectly insisted that 40 people were shot during a Vietnam War protest at Kent State in 1970.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ironically has been very vocal about how the party has no need for a middle of the road traditional candidate and has been at the forefront of criticizing Biden on his approach to Climate Change.
Biden has not publicly released a Climate Change proposal. However, it is evident that within his own party he has enemies that wish to use state psychology attacks on him in order to demonstrate that he is incompetent.
President Trump has always been threatened with the idea that his enemies can use the 25th Amendment citing poor mental health to push him out of office.
He has been cited as crazy for wanting to buy Greenland, off the cuff remarks about nuking hurricanes and his latest comments about how he wasn’t sure if he ever heard of a Category 5 hurricane.
Recently, it was even reported that the President is losing his sanity because he may have contracted syphilis.
There is an inherent danger to weaponizing mental health and using it against your political enemies.
The question is how far are we willing to go in enforcing a state social name for psychology and mental health that the state actually prefers? How are authorities able to enforce psychopathological mechanisms of dissent?
The answer is in the computers, cell phones, and electronic assistants.
Psychology studies have found that there is neurological evidence that supports that laptop screen and digital computerized systems could eventually be responsible for ‘altering’ and in some cases revealing the brain’s neural structure.
Remember when we speculated about the computer and sympathetic or organized A.I. knowing what you are thinking? This is no longer speculation—what you do on the internet and choices you make with any kind of electronics is now a dead giveaway to your mental state.
There is a record of every choice you make and we know that we are being monitored for possible violations of what Orwell called Thought Crime.
The computers and cell phones are now effecting and tapping into the left hemisphere of the brain, this is what directs the operations of the senses and the intellect.
A compulsive immersion in a computer-centered existence can actually bring about a biological modification of brain structure…. one that evokes less conscious interest in or capability of responding to external events.
Nothing actually happens to you while constantly and totally immersed in the screen-world of ‘scanning’ and ‘tweeting’ or endless ‘fact-gathering’. You are, after all, withdrawn from any personal, active participation in events occurring in the outside World of Time and Space – removed from the ‘theater’ of life – those ‘computerized hours’ become a substitute for the real thing.
Inevitably, such a withdrawal causes one to become detached – desensitized, in that the ability ‘to feel’ empathically, sympathetically…. diminishes, inevitably reducing one’s ability to completely comprehend the significance of what is going on. Furthermore, it also results in a loss of verbal competence to express thought and feeling…. not to mention inhibiting personal reflection or contemplation…. and the practice of actually writing (not keyboard ‘tapping’), as the most effective means of clarifying one’s ‘felt-thoughts’.
As for ‘Big Brother’ watching…. well, computer technology has made severe inroads in one’s privacy. Surveillance is widespread – locally, nationally, and internationally.
Throughout the day the mainstream news has been reporting about something we warned you about weeks ago and that is President Trump is waiting to enact draconian gun control measures with a creepy proposal to somehow identify the “neurobehavioral signs” of “someone headed toward committing a violent explosive act.
The administration has been briefed multiple times on a plan to create a new government agency whose powers would include sussing out individuals it regards as potential threats—a dystopian aim that should terrify every one because of what it will do to your cognitive liberty.
Implementing these ideas will make every American citizen a targeted individual.
In the wake of deadly shootings in El Paso and Dayton earlier this month, the president suggested he would be willing to support strengthened background checks and other gun-control measures. But he’s since backed away from those proposed reforms under pressure from the National Rifle Association, instead of blaming mental illness for the violence.
The Trump administration is reportedly weighing a proposal from the Suzanne Wright Foundation — a pancreatic cancer research organization founded by Trump friend Bob Wright to establish a new government department called the Health Advanced Research Projects Agency, which the group has suggested could house a project to address gun violence that they’re calling Safe Home: “Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping Overcome Mental Extremes.”
President Donald Trump has a close relationship with Bob Wright, who founded the foundation after his wife died of cancer. Wright was a former chair of NBC and occupied that position while the president hosted “The Apprentice.”
This project will cost taxpayers 40 -60 million dollars would “attempt to use volunteer data” to detect signs of mental instability that may foreshadow shootings before they happen.
Further details have been leaked that state the following:
“HARPA would develop “breakthrough technologies with high specificity and sensitivity for early diagnosis of neuropsychiatric violence,” says a copy of the proposal. “A multi-modality solution, along with real-time data analytics, is needed to achieve such an accurate diagnosis.”
HARPA lists a number of widely used technologies that will be employed to help collect data, including Apple Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo and Google Home. HARPA will also use “powerful tools” collected by health-care provides like fMRIs, tractography and image analysis.
The full scope of the program is chilling and would provide Big Tech with an easy excuse to formally impose the total neuro-surveillance of citizens via their smartphone and home assistant devices, something that has already been occurring surreptitiously for years.
One wonders if Trump has any idea of the slippery slope this would entail and how this will lead to the enforcement of a state psychology that prohibits anyone from speaking badly or rebelling against the state.
Again what we are witnessing is the American version of the Chinese social credit system.
A system that will most certainly be used to pathologize a political opponent or an opponent of the government. It is a nightmare to think that we are even furthering our enforcement of what we can call, Thought Crime.
Much like Climate Change, “Thought Crime” can be anything a true believer could want it to mean. There is nothing more aggravating than having someone actually explain to you what emotions you have or having someone tell you how they perceive your moods.
There is nothing more annoying than having a co-worker or someone else telling you to smile when you don’t feel like it.
It is even more hideous when someone is emotionally manipulating you with either a guilt trip or gaslighting you into submission.
In Nazi Germany, Nazi interrogators would use something called “Gummiparagraph” It literally means “the rubber rule.” Basically, rule that conveniently lends itself to being applied to all circumstances. It can mean moving the goalposts by re-defining what the goal is.
So, no law is defined at all but despotism, by its nature it is simply despotism.
All of this is an attempt to put people in a rhetorical thought gulag where they can be emotionally abused and controlled for disagreeing with what can be seen as a fashionable opinion.
Of course, actions such as these are what triggered the original witch hunts but we are too sophisticated to believe that there are no political affiliations that support witch hunts even though the left out us through three years of a witch hunt with Russian Collusion.
If you don’t think like the state, then you are mentally ill, if you are climate change denier you should be put in prison if you are patriot that is a dog whistle for being fascist — it is all laid out for us and people are actually participating in this.
As Americans, we should detest being ordered about what to think and we should stop having cottage industry victims order us around about how we should feel about something.
We live in a world where we are now being censored for our emotions and monitored for signs that we may have the propensity of shooting us a shopping mall or a school.
Can this be any more obvious? Is there a reason why the religious followers of Donald Trump can’t express to him that his ideas of weaponizing mental health are akin to what happened in Soviet Russia?
Can anyone confront the left and tell them that there have been times when they have been on the wrong side of history? From Slavery to the KKK the left have been in denial and are actually trying to destroy historical records so that we will try and forget all of the horrible things that have been done in the name of state psychology.
Can someone also tell the left that just because someone says something they don’t agree with that does not make them a hater, a Nazi or a fascist?
Make no mistake: the only purpose this political construct serves is to empower those elements in society who wish the implement the most vile and destructive use of the powers that has been given to them.
The current call for psychiatric “normalcy” is a call for conformity to and acceptance of the status quo. Dissent or posing a control problem is increasingly seen as an indication of a mental health problem.
Nothing else explains the 2012 Centers for Disease Control states that indicate 13.5% percent of boys from ages 3-17 have been diagnosed with ADHD; 5.4 percent of girls in that age range share the diagnosis. One reason the stats are so high is that public schools and other state institutions want passive obedience, not independence.
We are seeing excuses being made that replace the concept of responsibility.
That includes caring for the environment or owning a firearm.
With increasing zeal Americans use and interpret the assertion ‘I am sick’ as equivalent to the assertion I am not responsible or I am a victim and you owe me your empathy!
This utilizes guilt as a weapon and from there you can analyze a person’s ability to give a damn and if they don’t, they must be mentally ill. If they don’t want to participate, they must be mentally ill and if they speak up about how they are tired of it all, they are mentally unstable. If they express it on social media, they will be visited by a SWAT team.
That is the advantage to those who willingly accept the label of “mental illness.” The advantage to authorities is the ability to sanctimoniously control and punish people while shifting the blame onto those being victimized.