SOYLENT GREEN GIANT
MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
When I try to determine what may happen in the future I often look at the commentary and warnings that have been portrayed in our past literature. There have been authors who have developed stories that build upon the thought of a future unfulfilled utopia that often devolves into the familiar dystopia thesis.
The dystopia thesis always includes the devaluation of life. It also includes the robbing of virtue from the innocent and the idea that the children are sacrificed if not physically but spiritually in many and all forms.
Reproductive laws are put into play, restrictions on what kind of children are to be brought into the world and whether or not the child will fit in genetically and or mentally into the dystopic world order.
It is often titillating to read and discuss the works of Orwell, Asimov, Bradbury, Clarke, and Huxley because many things that they talked about seem to be coming to pass in our present.
It is truly a “Brave New World,” and those who are coming into it need to be brave in order to survive.
There is yet another dystopian story that was set in the year 2022. The story is called “Make Room, Make Roomundefined by Harry Harrison. The story was written in 1966, and deals with scarcity in the year 2022.
The earth in 2022 has very humid air because of the greenhouse effect. Oceans are drying up and the environment is collapsing because of overpopulation and the people have legalized euthanasia of the elderly because of resource depletion.
40 million people live in New York City, and there is a shortage of water, food, and housing. Only the cityundefineds elite can afford clean water and natural food, and even then at horrendously high prices.
Soylent Industries, which derives its name from a combination of undefinedsoyundefined and undefinedlentilundefined, controls the food supply of half of the world and sells the artificially produced wafers, including undefinedSoylent Redundefined and undefinedSoylent Yellowundefined. Their latest product is the far more flavorful and nutritious undefinedSoylent Greenundefined, which is allegedly made from plankton and is in short supply. As a result of the weekly supply bottlenecks, the hungry masses regularly riot, and they are brutally removed from the streets by means of police vehicles that scoop the rioters with large shovels and dumps them elsewhere.
Soylent Industries are keeping a secret. Investigators find volumes of oceanographic reports that indicate that the oceans no longer produce the plankton from which Soylent Green is reputedly made.
So what is in the Soylent crackers that people are eating?
Protein provided by human remains.
Of course, this story is familiar because it was made into a 1973 film that starred Charlton Heston.
We are not far from 2022; in fact, you would think that along with the political dystopia we see happening similar to 1984 – the Soylent Green era is coming soon; maybe sooner than 2022.
With Climate Change prognosticators making up doom stories in assorted hilarious ways on a daily basis, a world population cresting over seven billion, devastating global pandemics a constant threat, poisons in the air, water, and food supplies diminishing because of calamitous situations – the Soylent Green playbook is literally look like the Green Deal agenda.
America is being set up right now with its beggar-my-neighbor trade and geopolitical approach, and the left using climate disruption and scarcity as a reason to redistribute wealth with state socialism is going to result in a crop of troubles. The radical leverage of US interests to the point of zero-tolerance of others’ interests is actually having us all wondering if there is a Plan B.
Well, there is an answer to all of this and again – you may want to brace yourself because Plan B looks very much like the plot to Soylent Green.
We have all heard of the 2030 Summit document which is a bold political plan that was first proposed in 2015. It looks as if this is the Plan B and the pieces are being moved on the grand chessboard that will place us on the road to a dystopian future much like the vision we saw in 1973.
The undefinedgoalsundefined of this document are nothing more than code words for a corporate-government fascist agenda that will imprison humanity in a devastating cycle of poverty while enriching the worldundefineds most powerful globalist corporations like Monsanto Foods and other pharmaceutical companies.
Some of the chief proposals outline what the future holds for the planet.
First, they wish to end poverty for everyone everywhere on the planet. This includes socialist welfare programs housing subsidies and handouts in which you will be reminded that you owe your livelihood to the world Government. The government will also provide a basic living wage to everyone in order to facilitate an equal distribution of wealth.
Another goal is to end hunger, eliminate famine and food scarcity by providing sustainable agriculture that is carbon-free and “green-friendly.” This means that our future foods will include genetically modified plants to boost specific vitamin chemicals while having no idea of the long-term consequences of genetic pollution or cross-species genetic experiments carried out openly in a fragile ecosystem.
Other oddities that will be introduced into our foodstuffs are modified proteins from other sources.
Recently, Pepsi, known for its sodas and snacks like Doritos, Cheetos, and Quaker Oats cereal, posted an innovation request on the idea portal, Nine Sights, looking for a novel, sustainable, non-GMO protein sources for usage in their products. The firm noted that the protein source should have a minimal impact on the flavor and texture of the end product, and must be easy to process and handle.
Saying they would like “to achieve a protein level that provides a measurable positive impact for consumers while enabling a comparable consumer experience,” Pepsi’s primary focus is finding a plant-based protein source. They are also considering fungi-and insect-based protein.
Furthermore, the request also mentioned that they have already done extensive research on soy, moringa (a protein powder made from dried leaves of the horseradish tree), duckweed, cricket powder, pea protein, single-cell protein, and mealworm powder.
Additionally, the company wrote that it wishes to avoid usage of dairy, egg, meat, and gelatin sourced protein.
In 2016, Campbell Soup Co. launched a line of non-dairy, plant-based milk made from pea protein. In the same year, Tyson Foods started a venture capital fund worth $150 million to invest in companies that produce meat substitutes, while General Mills’ VC firm, 301 Inc., invested in meat-alternative companies such as Beyond Meat and Kite Hill. These companies mainly use nuts and other plant proteins in their products.
While you may be saying to yourself it all sounds disgusting, it wasn’t long ago that Sushi was seen by western cultures as a disgusting way to eat fish. Hot dogs are certainly something people don’t think twice about eating – even when it consists of a slimy concoction of milk solids and trash meats. Can you imagine a hot dog or sausage that consists of mealworms or a new type of California roll that includes Beatles?
Well, if it tastes good, it will come to market and soon.
Worldwide the demand for insect protein is growing, with the United States as one of their biggest customers. Furthermore, in addition to startups that jumped on the insect trend, big corporations such as Pepsi, Kellogg, Cargill, and Disney are buying the cricket powders for their research and development of new products.
A team of researchers at the Abertay University in Dundee, U.K. have created a cookie recipe made of cricket flour in hopes of attaining a more sustainable food source for the world’s estimated population of nine billion people by 2050.
In making the cookies, the research team used house crickets from Thailand that were finely-ground into flour. According to the experts, the flour contained about 1,100 crickets for every 100 grams. The research team also noted that the flour used was organic, fairtrade, gluten-free and rich in protein.
The researchers then used other traditional ingredients in baking the cookies. The experts stressed that preconceived attitudes about food should change in order to meet the food demands of a growing global population.
You may not want to eat a whole cricket, but if it’s hidden away in flour, or in a biscuit, you may be more likely to accept it. The flour is already for sale and there are a handful of companies that have started out in this market.
Keep in mind that many people featured in the bible feasted on locusts, crickets, honey, and ants as food sources. Honey comes from insects and we do not even wince at the idea of eating that.
While we are all trying to wrap our heads around foods made from insect powder there are other meat alternatives that climate lunatics are recommending that we eat.
Advanced climate decarbonization policies are also part of the 2030 plans.
This means eliminating carbon in the name of saving the planet.
It goes without saying that all food webs on planet Earth are based on carbon. All plants consume carbon dioxide and would die without it. All humans are made of carbon. Setting aside water and hydrogen, carbon is the most abundant element by atomic count in the human body.
Therefore, the climate agenda is a war on carbon and to eliminate unnecessary carbon footprints which eventually means that the human population also needs to be thinned in order to retain a sustainable planet.
Schemes are being actively pursued by globalists (Bill Gates), scientists, academia, and governments to collapse global food webs and replace them with alternative protein and vegetable foodstuffs.
In order to do this people have to be groomed into eating such foods and if they don’t there are schemes in play that will engineer scarcity of common foods. Engineered global food web collapse affecting both ocean-based and land-based ecosystems can be achieved through geoengineering.
Already fast-food franchises like Carl’s Jr. and Burger King have introduced the Impossible Burger that uses alternative proteins in peas, fungus, and beets in order to synthesize a burger that tastes like beef.
Recently the “chicken warsundefined have begun with the Chick-fil-A and Popeye’s Chicken sandwich competition but the real Chicken alternative war has already been won over the public as Kentucky Fried Chicken introduced their Beyond Chicken to market in Atlanta, Georgia.
KFCundefineds Beyond Fried Chicken sold out in less than five hours. KFC will decide to roll out the product to all of its franchises if the Atlanta test shows that the customers like the flavor and the texture of their new chicken alternative.
This adds new meaning to the old axiom “It tastes like chicken.”
Many times people have tried such things as rabbit, rattlesnake, frog legs and alligator saying it tastes like chicken and alternative meats like venison and Buffalo have unique flavors that remind people that beef isn’t the only thing that can satisfy the human penchant for animal protein.
However, there is one meat that does not seem to be on the radar to be synthesized anytime soon and that is Pork. It is easy to synthesize chicken and create a bleeding burger – pork is next, but it is still in development.
Meanwhile, some scientists have actually jumped over the Pork alternative and have suggested that if we need to make better use of our food resources we may want to break the taboo of eating human flesh.
This is not a joke – this actually being suggested as a way we can make better use of our resources as we want to reduce the carbon on the planet to zero – think about that for a moment.
Reducing the carbon to zero includes removing humans and using them as food sources.
A Swedish scientist is now promoting the “food of the future” … and it’s dead humans. And yes, just as you suspected, eating dead humans is being pushed in the name of stopping “Climate Change.”
He told the host of the show that one of the biggest obstacles to the proposal would be the taboo nature of corpses and the fact that many would see it as defiling the deceased.
Söderlund also acknowledged that people are “slightly conservative” when it comes to eating things they are not accustomed to, such as cadavers.
He is not the only Climate Change lunatic that promotes eating humans to save the planet, Newsweek recently featured an outrageous article about breaking the taboo of cannibalism as a way to beat Climate Change.
According to Piazza and McLatchie, most people find cannibalism disgusting and abhorrent not because it actually is, but because society has trained everyone to think this way. If it weren’t for the concept being “overridden by our feelings of repulsion and disgust,” more people would accept cannibalism as normal, according to the psychologists.
Stopping short of actually promoting cannibalism, since they claim “there is no need to overcome our repulsion for the foreseeable future,” Piazza and McLatchie contend that humans should start trying to overcome their aversion to human flesh because one day they might have to eat human flesh in order to survive.
If you’re still too grossed out by the thought of consuming human flesh despite all of this, that revulsion isn’t a matter of reason, these two academics further claim. You’re actually being unreasonable, they insist because some people throughout history have had to eat other people in order to survive.
In their paper, they propose the story of the famous 1972 Andes plane crash as one prominent example, citing the fact that survivors almost starved to death before “succumbing to reason” and “eating those who had already died.”
In other words, it’s completely reasonable for people to eat other people and if you don’t agree, then you’re the problem.
For now, these two authors insist that it’s okay to not embrace cannibalism because it isn’t yet a necessity. But in their mind, it one day could be, seeing as how “philosophers have argued that burying the dead could be wasteful in the context of the fight against world hunger.
However, that does not rule out the possibility that human protein cannot be made into a flour and put in crackers like what is depicted in the film, Soylent Green.
That would make it more palatable; in fact, in places like China and North Korea, dead baby fetuses are actually ground into a dry powder form mixed with herbs and put in capsules as a health supplement. Of course, it is sold on the black market and authorities have attempted to stop the practice.
The powder is made from babies that either are aborted or delivered still-born.
The tiny corpses are then bought, stored in refrigerators before they are removed and taken to clinics where they are placed in medical drying microwaves.
The dust is then encapsulated and sold as a supplement to restore youth and vitality.
In the 1970s, a scientist named Alex Van der Eb was able to discover a cell line from human embryonic kidney cells was called HEK293. In essence, fetuses that have already been aborted are being used for renal cells. Those cells are being used as artificial taste buds.
The cell line has been cultured and grown in laboratories. Its primary use is as a protein or a protein vessel — sort of a natural test tube. It’s also pretty common and seems to be available at most laboratory supply companies and used by many R&D facilities. This cell line and natural test tube is used in synthesizing many things. One thing, in particular, is the food additive known as Senomyx.
Senomyx has been known to be used in Campbell’s Soup, Nestle Cocoa. Kraft macaroni and Cheese and Diet Pepsi.
On the company website, Senomyx describes research to find new ways to improve food flavors by taking advantage of the mouth’s taste receptors.
While the Senomyx Company says that they have no ties to stem cell experiments or use of fetal tissue on their flavor enhancers Research on Google turns up a patent that was issued in 2008 for “Recombinant Methods for Expressing a Functional Sweet Taste Receptor,” in which a line item mentions using HEK293.
The Plan B proposals in the 2030 agenda, of course, do not outline how they can feed the earth but as we see science is preparing us for what the New Green deal will eventually entail.
Not only will we reduce populations, but we can also use the dead as resources in order to improve on the environment and carbon pollution.
These programs proposed will not only disrupt our lives but will also tightly control all agriculture through a corporate-corrupted government bureaucracy whose policies are determined almost entirely by Monsanto while being rubber-stamped by the USDA.
If you read the full document of the 2030 proposals and can read beyond the fluffery and public relations phrases, youundefinedll quickly realize that this UN agenda is going to be forced upon all the citizens of the world through the invocation of government coercion.
Nowhere does this document state that the rights of the individual will be protected. Nor does it even acknowledge the existence of human rights granted to individuals by God.
Even the so-called undefinedUniversal Declaration of Human Rightsundefined that they are proposing utterly denies individuals the right to self-defense, the right to medical choice and the right to parental control over their own children.
The UN is planning nothing less than a global government tyranny that enslaves all of humanity while calling the scheme undefinedsustainable developmentundefined and undefinedequality.undefined
The politics of right-wing or left-wing doesn’t matter one iota in the future as you dig deeper into the philosophies he has espoused and how it is the underlying dream of the global sustainability cult to eliminate man out of the equation in nature. You would be surprised to learn that sustainability agendas are hidden in the “Global Warming” proposals. Sustainability plans include the culling of humans in order for the earth to become ecologically balanced.
In 1992, there was a proposal for Natural Sustainable Development. A comprehensive action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by the United Nations to literally use whatever means necessary to reduce the population of the planet.
The plan has also been called Agenda 21 which is a 40 chapter plan on how to implement zero population growth, eugenics, war casualties and socialist programs to reduce populations. The book was an elitist “how-to” guide for genocide. It also brought up new and interesting ways to motivate people to accept a crisis so dire that they would be willing to kill themselves to avoid having to live through it.
There are many people who have accepted the “Global Warming” agenda as a harmless agenda that is meant to conserve energy and open the doors to the idea of alternative fuels. While that part of the “green” philosophy is great for the conservation of resources, there are hidden genetics directives that when illustrated can have you understand that “Global Sustainability” is the goal of “Climate Change.”
Sha Zukang who was a member of the communist dictatorship ruling mainland China was the organizer and author of the Global Government Plan for Sustainability. He also is the UN Conference Secretary-General of the Global Sustainability Summit and the 2030 proposals. Sha Zukang has been one of the notorious “planners” at the United Nations for a sustainability framework based on the Chinese Model. This is the Chinese framework that I have spoken of since 2009 as the government of the proposed New World Order.
This is no longer conspiracy theory but fact. The Green Plan for the United States will, in fact, require your compliance to a new form of government based on economic models of China.
It will require the removal of most dairy foods, and those who wish to eat animal meats will be forced to eat meats fashioned in guilt-free labs.
The Soylent Green future expects you to accept the wisdom of repugnance. It is an appeal for disgust in order to recreate the planet in the image of the Climate cultists.
Not only do we have to fight for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in the future but we might also consider fighting for life, liberty, and the defense of dignity.
