ALTERNATIVE THIRD REALM
I think that if there were ever a time where you can witness my mind unraveling is now. In the 16 years I have been on the air I have never had a whack theory challenged by an equally whacked out theory about the moon. Now I know I have said that we did not land on the moon in 1969 and that now I am entertaining the idea that while we didn’t go to he moon in 1969, we still may have had the capability to go to the moon in the 1940’s or 1950’’s. That sounds confusing, so much so that a person who has been listening to me has decided that he can’t take me seriously.
Well I guess I can say this, to that notion. The truth may be stranger than we think and what we are now hearing makes more sense than you realize. The 1969 moon document was faked. It is becoming more and more obvious that this is the case. However there is a new twist to the story that needs to be investigated and that is the idea that perhaps with advanced German technology there were men on the moon prior top 1969 and that the Apollo moon shots had to be faked in order to keep the attention away from the secret space program. We were told that the 1969 Apollo 11 mission went without a hitch with technology we can now find in our toaster oven. This is unbelievable What if there was technology far more advanced that we couldn’t talk about and that moon and mars landing happened long before NASA was conceived?
It is undeniable a disconnect and confusion for most, but it makes sense to anyone who has followed the story from the first day of the moon shot until now, where filmmakers and writer no longer are keeping quiet—they are saying that we do not know the whole story about the moon and if we did we probably would want to try out the guns displayed at a gun show.
Either way these latest revelations are confusing and as I research more and more I am stumbling on some very interesting information that changes the entire game. It changes both history and even conspiracy history.
History haunts us every day. It is a ghost that should serve us instead of frighten us. For most people the hardest pill to swallow is that we are slaves to our own fear. Not just the immediate fear of terrorism, but the fear of cataclysm that has been hardwired into our brains. In 1950, Immanuel Velikovsky published Worlds In Collision, a book detailing that in antiquity, catastrophe and cosmic upheaval were reoccurring events. Velikovsky’s research led to the disturbing conclusion that early civilizations were nearly destroyed by the close approach of a great comet.
From ancient texts and papyri we read that perhaps “creation” was not creation at all but a transitory moment where a reorganizing and rebuilding took place after a cosmic catastrophe. Those who were prepared before the great catastrophe knew how to take the building blocks for creation and apply them to a renewed earth.
In an entirely different scenario, there could have been building blocks for life floating around in space, eventually coming to earth. Through a long process of evolution, these building blocks eventually divided and grew in much the same process as a sperm penetrates an ovum.
Picture the tail of the sperm cell. It travels a long way to get to the ovum, carrying information, building blocks and DNA necessary for the continued process of life. It penetrates the wall and delivers its cargo.
The earth is destroyed and the life process begins again.
Now, picture in your mind a comet heading for earth. It has a long tail. If we assume the theories of Fred Hoyle, it carries building blocks, information, and DNA to begin the life process on earth. It penetrates the earth’s atmosphere and eventually delivers it’s cargo.
And the life process begins.
It all looks the same… could it all be the same? Is this a piece of the cosmic puzzle? Could one cell be an entire universe, or a universe be only a cell in some organism?
Was the earth destroyed by some unbelievable cataclysm and then renewed as the building blocks for life were reintroduced to the earth, taken from some cosmic library or pantry?
Where were they stored ? How did they end up here?
It was Charles Fort that theorized that the world or the universe as a single macro-creature, an “organic existence”, and that we owe this existence to some controller who had the wisdom to construct the earth and the universe similar to a human body. Something, or someone, sent building blocks for life to this planet knowing full well that they would take root and that a planet that was destroyed by cataclysm could be renewed again with DNA from beings that previously existed and thought of saving their seed for future planting.
Fort had envisioned extraterrestrial tinkering. However, he stopped short of declaring them “humanlike” or “anthropomorphic.” He often discussed the concept that a rain of flesh and blood, and components for human life were sent to the planet from another place. The speculation is that there has been an exchange ofr matter and life for billions of years.
It appears that perhaps this has been a constant exchange as it has been reported that perhaps that mars took mass from Jupiter. That the planets may have accumulated mass from each other during a close passing in the galaxy’s infancy
We can extrapolate the natural means of transportation of life from Fred Hoyle ‘s research model. Meteorites have been found on Earth that originated on Mars, which proves that material from one planet can travel to another. Since we have strong evidence to suggest that life has existed on Mars and perhaps still does, we can theorize that it might have been born here by the meteors or comets.
We can also see that there is a never ending cycle of catastrophe and that it is time to understand that we live on an unstable planet and that there have been agendas put forth to give us the impression that our problems with the natural elements are unique when they aren’t/ Other civilizations have dealt with these issues and some have vanished, but where did they go? Were they able to leave this planet in order to give the planet a break? A 1000 year cycle to allow it to repair itself? Will this be happening in our lifetime?
Perhaps the settlements, and so called space stations that are being seen now are products of that exodus, or is it something else? There are still mysteries to uncover.
The secret space program is now being looked into with all of its surprises and strangeness. What is the purpose of the space program we do not see, the one that is supposed to give us secret knowledge about alien? Are there Colonies and other such wonders that up until now have been a part of old conspiracy yarns about the Nazis?
There is still another puzzle piece in this cosmic conspiracy that rivals the moon landing as fiction becoming fact in the sense that there are half truths being told and that if you take the time you can see that smokescreens are made to divert your attention away from the real underlying themes.
The puzzle piece is a British mockumentary entitled Alternative 3.
Beginning as a documentary about Great Britain’s “brain drain,” Where many scientists had disappeared or died in some scientist rapture Alternative 3 soon evolves into an investigation into why the space experts disappeared. . The research presented over the course of the program leads to the fantastic hypothesis that the missing experts have been taken off world as part of some secret American/Soviet space program.
Further, it is suggested that space travel is far more advanced and has been a reality for much longer than most people believe. The show even featured a fictional Apollo astronaut, who claimed to have stumbled upon a mysterious Lunar base during his moonwalk. That the Apollo missions had later been faked in order to show off he hardware that they could no longer use because the astronauts were not welcomed with open arms.
In this compelling TV show scientists had determined that the Earth’s surface would soon become uninhabitable, due to pollution that causes catastrophic climate change, and that three Alternatives to this problem were suggested. The first two Alternatives were considered too crazy to work and were quickly abandoned. Leaving only the third Alternative, the “Alternative 3” of the title, to colonise Mars via a base on the Moon.
Alternative 3 ends with a video of an alleged manned landing on Mars in 1962, seven years before Neil Armstrong stepped onto the Moon. The video even goes as far as showing something moving beneath the Martian soil, strongly suggesting the presence of life on the red planet.
Much of what I saw in the documentary also mimics or at least takes liberties with what was issued in a book entitled Report from Iron Mountain.
In 1961, the Kennedy administration ordered a “Top Secret” study to determine what problems the United States would face if the world moved from an era of war to a golden age of peace. In other words, how to bring America into the New World Order. By 1963 the selection of the specialist had been made. This study group consisted of 15 experts in various academic disciplines who were selected for their expertise in their various fields. The first and last meetings were in an underground nuclear survival retreat called Iron Mountain.
By the Time the plan was completed Kennedy was already dead and President Johnson demanded that the plan be kept secret. Johnson claimed that the plans that were discussed in the report would take a generation and a half to fully implement. The plan was abandoned.
The “Report from Iron Mountain” was leaked to the mainstream press in 1967. It argued that though world peace was a nice idea, the economy of war was such a vital part of global stability, it was difficult to come up with substitutes.
The report was literally a blueprint of proposed manufactured crises that the government could employ during peace time in order to keep the war and military busy and the people looking for protection from threats. The report claimed that a gradual implementation of such crisis would guarantee the need for basic social controls. The project would take at least a generation and a half to have full impact.
The crisis agenda from the document sounds familiar to us today because the agendas it seems have been implemented.
First agenda on the list to change the people is the Hijacking of the economy. The book states that bankrupting an economy will guarantee that the people will demand that the government save them. It states: Economic surrogates for war must meet principal criteria. They must be “wasteful,” in the common sense of the word, and they must operate outside the normal supply-demand system.
A failure or transitional government is also part of the agenda to guarantee a demand for continuity and an introduction to a new world global government. It is also the focus of major religions. Iron mountain concludes that religion is fragile and there can be ways to make it crumble with revelations that contradict biblical passages and damage religious dogmas. The agenda reads as follows:
The solution of today’s problems requires an approach which is ruthlessly candid, with no agonizing over religious, moral or cultural values.
The church can be destroyed swiftly with the advent of extremism, eschatological zealots, and pedophilic priests. The next phase can be implemented with ordination of women to the priesthood which would cause a schism. Another way to eliminate dogmatic religion is to manufacture a alien invasion or threat.
According to the book it reads that a Space menace can guarantee total control.
“It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last, best hope of peace,“ by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging.”
Furthermore it states that there is a need to create a space program for economic and political purposes. A space program that is literally a smokescreen for something else.
We anticipate no difficulties in making a “need” for a giant super space program credible for economic purposes, even were there not ample precedent; extending it, for political purposes, to include features unfortunately associated with science fiction would obviously be a more dubious undertaking.
According to the book it would be equally beneficial to create an environmental crisis as well:
“Nevertheless, an effective political substitute for war would require “alternate enemies,” some of which might seem equally far- fetched in the context of the current war system. It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power.”
Meanwhile all of the themes of Alternative 3 can be found in the book. Alternative 3 is clearly a fake documentary. However, it makes itself an important piece of predictive programming. Themes such as climate change and even the possibility of space settlement have now been reported in the mainstream and the data is creating some interesting questions.
The space program has been shut down, this after President Bush presented the idea of colonies on the Moon. What if we are learning that there are colonies already there.
Stephen Hawking called for a massive investment in establishing colonies on the Moon and Mars in a lecture to mark NASA’s 50th anniversary. Hawking argued that the world should devote about 10 times as much as NASA’s current budget to space.
The renowned physicist had previously spoken in favor of colonizing space, just like in Alternative 3, as an insurance policy against the possibility of humanity being wiped out by catastrophic climate change: “Life on Earth is at an ever-increasing risk of being wiped out by a disaster such as sudden global warming… I therefore want to encourage public interest in space.”
We have now seen possible evidence of colonies al;ready on the moon and Mars, and three hardnosed skeptic film makers now saying the Moon landing is a hoax.
We are still on earth looking up and wondering what it coming. We all know that there will be something coming from heaven to warn us that our destruction could happen at any time.