WORLD CONTROL AND THE ABSURDITY OF PLANETS
Perhaps it caught me on a bad day, maybe I slept poorly but the day I received a mountain of e-mails about a planet that had been discovered in the news, I just shrugged and said to myself so what? I expressed my reaction to some friends and they couldn’t believe I was so uninterested about it.
They tried to convince me that this was a major discovery. It is a planet situated some 600 light years away called Kepler-22b . It is just outside of our solar system and close to earth. It is known as a “goldilocks” planet where the conditions are just right for life. I have heard countless reports about planets like these and every time I wonder why they even bother to waste the space or the time to tell us about them. As of April 2011, The Kepler mission has discovered 1,235 possible planets, with 54 of those candidates located within a habitable or “goldilocks” zone.
Don’t get me wrong, I mean I want to believe that somewhere out there life exists; it’s the very mystery that fuels my curiosity and gives me material for my shows. However the same space agency that issues these reports is the same space agency that tells me that there are no aliens, that reports of UFO’s are given by the fantasy prone and that there is no reason to suspect that government has covered up anything that even smacks of alien intervention.
How can these agencies cast a jaundiced eye at those who speculate about life out there can at the same time tell us that a planet with the perfect conditions for life is so close to earth? They have done it many times before and each time it doesn’t change their smug attitude towards UFO enthusiasts and it doesn’t call of their paid skeptics demanding equal time on news programs and myth busting specials.
Since one light year is the equivalent nearly six trillion miles, it would take 22 million years to travel 600 light years on a space shuttle and visit Kepler 22-b with our current technology.
Here is another secret – They really haven’t seen the planet at all. They haven’t taken a snapshot. There are no wallet size photos with aliens waving back – they merely measure the tiny perturbations of gravity that a planet has on its star. This way they are able to measure minute changes in the light reaching us as the planet passed in front of a star. Literally something blinked and then science fills in the blanks. It then winds up in the news and people all dream about world without number in a galaxy far, far away.
So I am left wondering how absurd is the report of these planets? What is the purpose of speculating on blinks in the cosmos and in the same breath ridiculing those who believe in aliens?
I can only speculate that it is part of the controlling the information with regard to affairs dealing with extraterrestrials. Those who control the information will release it when it is expedient to do so and when they do they won’t even have to present tangible evidence. They can say that some strange perturbation or blink in the solar system can convince scientists to all cooperate in the mass confirmation of life in space and that plans they have for us.
Things in space whether they are headed right for us or are perilously dangling above us have been known to redirect the course of human civilization.
The leaders of the world know this. As we are watching our world spin out of control and the threat of World War III is right in our glance it is necessary t notice how all of the these chaotic things both on this planet and elsewhere are all part of one big plan.
Great political leaders have written about it, they have spoken about the need for a United Globalist Movement to combat enemies that are not human. There have been many leaders of the world speaking of new pearl harbors, or events that create a public outcry for action. They are hoping to somehow create a scenario where the illusion of peril is just as effective as the peril itself.
For example we are right now watching the events in the Middle East unfold. We are also concerned with the echo of the Cold War as Russia and China one again rattler sabers declaring that a nuclear war will happen if NATO missiles are pointed at Europe.
We are hearing of explosions at Iran’s nuclear sites and many of their chief nuclear scientists are being assassinated. We also recently heard of a CIA drone that was shot down over the area and cyber attacks aimed at Iran’s military sites.
Chinese President Hu Jintao as now informed his navy to prepare for combat over maritime disputes with the US and its attempts to become a major military power in the pacific.
So here we are with our ear to the compartmentalized media that is clearly failing to keep us posted on these issues and we wonder why are they ignoring these heated exchanges of vitriol and chaos?
Could it be that the illusion of peril is happening and the real peril will only arrive when the media says it has? Think of it- I have been reporting this for a little over a week and the mainstream doesn’t even come close to speaking of it.
It is as if nuclear weapons or a nuclear conflict is only relevant when it is placed in a hyperreal sense. At the moment it is inert. The threat is real and only certain people can sense it, dream about it and talk about it. Others will only believe when it is set into the programmable state that media provides. Until hyperreality dictates that the missiles are locked and loaded there is a tendency for people to think that no one would ever resort to using them in any way. It is all an illusion until it is seen on a HD flat screen TV and delivered by a spokesperson that gets orders from the Pentagon.
This is clearly why we are in the middle of a World War in several theaters and yet the media will tell us that it is simply a number of atrocities connected to the evil of terrorism. The perception is all controlled and your point of you is based on what you perceive as true information offered by one who you have determined is an authority figure.
I could state that we are now in World War 3 – or tell you that this is World War 4 and unless you decide that my information has been solid– you will wait for someone who has been selected to speak for the consensus on the national news. You have to ask yourself why you think the way you do? Who is the person or group you can count on to give you the information you believe without question?
Do you really have time to analyze why you believe the way you do? Do you stop and question the motive for the release of certain stories in the mainstream? Why you decide that certain things are fact even though you know full well that you know nothing about what has been reported.
Compartmentalized news in a national corporate sense is permitted and certain stories are omitted in order to keep control of the population in a hyperreal sense.
To many people this is nothing new, but to the majority it may be hard to realize that sometimes what is not reported is far more important than what is reported and a perception in prejudice against certain forms of media is also part of the control mechanism.
I have been e-mailed many times that since I work at a station that uses Fox news at the top of the hour makes my information suspect. Those who say this have no idea how a radio station operates nor how I am under a no binding or censor and this is why I am able to maintain my integrity. Ground Zero would never be able to work under a gag order or an enforceable content restriction. I have no agenda, and what I report is what I feel is important – and most of the time it is information that won’t be reported in the mainstream or will be after it is filtered and homogenized for public consumption.
The way things are reported are all part of a psychological; control mechanism and the bigger plans have been drawn up generations ago and were meant to be implemented in a time where they would be most effective.
In 1961, the Kennedy administration ordered a “Top Secret” study to determine what problems the United States would face if the world moved from an era of war to a golden age of peace. In other words, how to bring America into the New World Order. By 1963 the selection of the specialist had been made. This study group consisted of 15 experts in various academic disciplines who were selected for their expertise in their various fields. The first and last meetings were in an underground nuclear survival retreat called Iron Mountain.
By the Time the plan was completed Kennedy was already dead and President Johnson demanded that the plan be kept secret. Johnson claimed that the plans that were discussed in the report would take a generation and a half to fully implement. The plan was abandoned.
The “Report from Iron Mountain” was leaked to the mainstream press in 1967. It argued that though world peace was a nice idea, the economy of war was such a vital part of global stability, it was difficult to come up with substitutes.
The report was literally a blueprint of proposed manufactured crises that the government could employ during peace time in order to keep the war and military busy and the people looking for protection from threats. The report claimed that a gradual implementation of such crisis would guarantee the need for basic social controls. The project would take at least a generation and a half to have full impact.
There are those who believe that the proposals in the report have been employed for 45 years conditioning the American people for acceptance of a global government. From the Chaos a New World Order.
The Book “Iron Mountain” has not been registered with the Library of Congress because in order to do so, the authors would have to be revealed.
On November 26, 1976, the report was reviewed in the book section of the Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, which was the pen name for Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith, who also had been a member of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), said that he knew firsthand of the report’s authenticity because he had been invited to participate in it. Although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project a secret. Furthermore, while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the report, he agreed totally with its conclusions.
The report is by most accounts the handbook that illustrates a 45 year social engineering program where the world governments would use social scare tactics to somehow bring the people together for a common globalist objective.
It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, slavery, cognitive dissonance , and genocide.
War is a “general social release” It provides “the release and redistribution of undifferentiated tensions”. In other words, a type of therapy. It is a “generational stabilizer“ that enables the “deteriorating older generation” to “maintain control of the younger, destroying it if necessary”. It clears ideology. It is a basis for international understanding. However there are noted substitutions for war, that when gradually brought into society can have the same effect.
There are tools outlined in the agenda that are now in place for the guaranteed breakdown of the society as we know it in America. They are all tried and true methods of creating an illusion of peril, for the sake of public reaction and the demand for knee jerk solutions that will break down the tenets of society and recreate it to the liking of the elite.
The first part of the Agenda is to destroy the economy. It is stated in the agenda that economic surrogates for war must meet principal criteria. They must be “wasteful,” in the common sense of the word, and they must operate outside the normal supply-demand system.
David Rockefeller once said that “We are on the verge of a global transformation, all we need is a global economic crisis and nations will want a New World order.”
Another way to get people to unite is to create a crisis of confidence within government. How easy would it be for a secret group to create a world police force as an external enemy of the people or even a group of criminal mob groups that carry out murder contracts against a group of people aka terrorists. Then propose a Global Government that has been deemed lawless and then abolish religious freedoms and freedom of speech?
Barack Obama said in 2008 that we cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
The Iron Mountain agenda clearly includes a plan to demonize religious groups by outing them as extremists. It clearly states that the solution of today’s problems requires an approach which is ruthlessly candid, with no agonizing over religious, moral or cultural values.
This is to be carried out with no thought of morality—and must be implemented to guarantee the foundation of the New World order and its charge for the universal empire.
It also includes that in order for religious foundations to clearly fall core belief systems about creation and purpose, God and his relationship to man must be altered, in order for this to happen there needs to be a sign from within the earth or from without.
First there are passages that conclude a perceived threat against the environment can create a need for resource management and a uniting against an invisible global menace:
“Nevertheless, an effective political substitute for war would require “alternate enemies,” some of which might seem equally far- fetched in the context of the current war system. It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. “
Finally the last directive to be used to resolve all differences is an agreed upon threat from space or in the words of the document “The Space Menace.”
“It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last, best hope of peace,“ by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging. We anticipate no difficulties in making a “need” for a giant super space program credible for economic purposes, even were there not ample precedent; extending it, for political purposes, to include features unfortunately associated with science fiction would obviously be a more dubious undertaking.”
Keep in mind that these proposals were written in 1961. Johnson claimed that it would take a generation and half for all of these proposals to take affect and capture the minds of the consensus.
That would mean that much of what was discussed in those secret meetings would have to be evident in the culture around 2006. It seems that it was mire than evident that abrupt changes were beginning to take place at around 2004. We were thrown into two wars, and since then we have witnessed an effort to convince the world of an Environmental menace, Global warming, mass economic failures, Government failures, new government unions, economic downturns, Religious changes, and a proposed militarized police force.
The only thing that has not been utilized to its full potential is the Space menace.
Now, how far away is that planet that has livable conditions? How much time do we have before we are hit by an asteroid?
What was that bright light you saw hovering in the sky the other night?
Oh the absurdity of it all.